evidence-justification-assessment
Evaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge
Best use case
evidence-justification-assessment is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Evaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge
Teams using evidence-justification-assessment should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/evidence-justification-assessment/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How evidence-justification-assessment Compares
| Feature / Agent | evidence-justification-assessment | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Evaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Evidence and Justification Assessment Skill Evaluate epistemic warrant and evidence quality using appropriate standards across different domains of inquiry. ## Overview The Evidence and Justification Assessment skill enables evaluation of epistemic warrant, assessment of evidence quality and relevance, application of epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, identification of knowledge sources, and analysis of justificatory structures. ## Capabilities ### Evidence Evaluation - Assess evidence quality - Evaluate relevance to claims - Consider evidence weight - Identify evidence types - Check evidence reliability ### Justification Analysis - Identify justificatory structures - Evaluate warrant transmission - Assess foundational vs. coherentist structures - Analyze inferential chains - Check for circular reasoning ### Epistemic Standards Application - Apply domain-appropriate standards - Distinguish epistemic contexts - Evaluate certainty requirements - Consider practical stakes - Balance rigor and feasibility ### Source Assessment - Identify knowledge sources - Evaluate source reliability - Consider testimony - Assess expertise claims - Check for bias and conflict ### Skeptical Analysis - Address skeptical challenges - Evaluate defeaters - Consider alternative explanations - Assess epistemic closure - Navigate skeptical arguments ## Usage Guidelines ### When to Use - Evaluating knowledge claims - Assessing arguments - Analyzing evidence - Teaching epistemology - Developing epistemic policies ### Best Practices - Consider context and stakes - Apply appropriate standards - Document assessment reasoning - Acknowledge uncertainty - Remain open to revision ### Integration Points - Conceptual Analysis skill - Argument Mapping and Reconstruction skill - Fallacy Detection and Analysis skill - Formal Logic Analysis skill ## References - Epistemic Evaluation process - Evidence Assessment process - Skeptical Challenge Analysis process - Metaphysics and Epistemology Agent - Logic Analyst Agent
Related Skills
compliance-evidence-collector
Automated evidence collection across compliance frameworks from cloud providers, identity systems, and security tools
psychometric-assessment
Develop, validate, and adapt measurement instruments including factor analysis, reliability testing, and cross-cultural validation
regulatory-compliance-assessment
Evaluate organizational compliance with healthcare regulations including HIPAA, CMS Conditions of Participation, and accreditation standards through gap analysis and audit procedures
assessment-item-development
Create valid, reliable assessment items across formats (multiple choice, constructed response, performance tasks) following psychometric best practices
conservation-assessment
Assess condition of artworks and cultural objects, develop treatment proposals, and document conservation interventions following AIC ethical guidelines
safety-assessment
Skill for structured safety assessment following ARP4761 guidelines
culture-assessment
Assess and measure organizational culture using validated frameworks
adkar-assessment
Assess and track ADKAR change readiness across stakeholder groups with intervention recommendations
process-builder
Scaffold new babysitter process definitions following SDK patterns, proper structure, and best practices. Guides the 3-phase workflow from research to implementation.
babysitter
Orchestrate via @babysitter. Use this skill when asked to babysit a run, orchestrate a process or whenever it is called explicitly. (babysit, babysitter, orchestrate, orchestrate a run, workflow, etc.)
yolo
Run Babysitter autonomously with minimal manual interruption.
user-install
Install the user-level Babysitter Codex setup.