linear-programming-solver
Linear programming skill for resource allocation, scheduling, and optimization problems
Best use case
linear-programming-solver is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Linear programming skill for resource allocation, scheduling, and optimization problems
Teams using linear-programming-solver should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/linear-programming-solver/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How linear-programming-solver Compares
| Feature / Agent | linear-programming-solver | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Linear programming skill for resource allocation, scheduling, and optimization problems
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Linear Programming Solver
## Overview
The Linear Programming Solver skill provides comprehensive capabilities for formulating and solving linear optimization problems. It supports resource allocation, production planning, scheduling, and other business optimization challenges through efficient solver integration and solution analysis.
## Capabilities
- LP model formulation assistance
- Solver integration (GLPK, CBC, CPLEX, Gurobi)
- Sensitivity analysis (shadow prices, reduced costs)
- Infeasibility diagnosis
- Unboundedness detection
- Integer programming support
- Multi-objective LP (goal programming)
- Solution interpretation
## Used By Processes
- Prescriptive Analytics and Optimization
- Resource Allocation
- Supply Chain Optimization
## Usage
### Problem Formulation
```python
# Define LP problem
lp_problem = {
"name": "Production Planning",
"sense": "maximize", # or "minimize"
"decision_variables": {
"product_A": {"type": "continuous", "lower_bound": 0, "upper_bound": 1000},
"product_B": {"type": "continuous", "lower_bound": 0, "upper_bound": 800},
"product_C": {"type": "integer", "lower_bound": 0} # integer variable
},
"objective": {
"expression": "50*product_A + 40*product_B + 60*product_C",
"description": "Maximize total profit"
},
"constraints": [
{
"name": "labor_hours",
"expression": "2*product_A + 3*product_B + 4*product_C <= 2400",
"description": "Total labor hours available"
},
{
"name": "machine_time",
"expression": "3*product_A + 2*product_B + 3*product_C <= 2000",
"description": "Machine time capacity"
},
{
"name": "raw_material",
"expression": "product_A + product_B + product_C <= 1200",
"description": "Raw material availability"
},
{
"name": "demand_A",
"expression": "product_A >= 100",
"description": "Minimum demand for product A"
}
]
}
```
### Solver Configuration
```python
# Solver settings
solver_config = {
"solver": "CBC", # or "GLPK", "CPLEX", "GUROBI"
"time_limit": 300, # seconds
"mip_gap": 0.01, # 1% optimality gap for MIP
"threads": 4,
"presolve": True,
"cuts": "automatic"
}
```
### Sensitivity Analysis
```python
# Request sensitivity information
sensitivity_config = {
"shadow_prices": True,
"reduced_costs": True,
"allowable_ranges": True,
"what_if": [
{"constraint": "labor_hours", "change": 100},
{"objective_coeff": "product_A", "change": 5}
]
}
```
## Common LP Problem Types
| Problem Type | Objective | Key Constraints |
|-------------|-----------|-----------------|
| Production Planning | Maximize profit | Capacity, demand |
| Transportation | Minimize cost | Supply, demand |
| Assignment | Minimize cost/time | One-to-one matching |
| Blending | Minimize cost | Quality specs, availability |
| Network Flow | Min cost/max flow | Flow balance, capacity |
| Portfolio | Maximize return | Risk, budget, diversification |
## Input Schema
```json
{
"problem_definition": {
"name": "string",
"sense": "maximize|minimize",
"decision_variables": "object",
"objective": {
"expression": "string",
"description": "string"
},
"constraints": ["object"]
},
"solver_config": {
"solver": "string",
"time_limit": "number",
"mip_gap": "number"
},
"analysis_options": {
"sensitivity": "boolean",
"what_if": ["object"],
"report_format": "string"
}
}
```
## Output Schema
```json
{
"status": "Optimal|Infeasible|Unbounded|TimeLimit",
"objective_value": "number",
"solution": {
"variable_name": "number"
},
"sensitivity": {
"shadow_prices": {
"constraint_name": {
"value": "number",
"allowable_increase": "number",
"allowable_decrease": "number"
}
},
"reduced_costs": {
"variable_name": {
"value": "number",
"allowable_increase": "number",
"allowable_decrease": "number"
}
}
},
"infeasibility_analysis": {
"conflicting_constraints": ["string"],
"suggested_relaxations": ["object"]
},
"what_if_results": ["object"],
"solve_time": "number"
}
```
## Sensitivity Interpretation
| Metric | Meaning | Use |
|--------|---------|-----|
| Shadow Price | Value of relaxing constraint by 1 unit | Prioritize constraint relief |
| Reduced Cost | Cost of forcing non-basic variable into solution | Evaluate non-optimal alternatives |
| Allowable Range | Range where basis stays optimal | Assess stability of solution |
## Best Practices
1. Verify model formulation with simple test cases
2. Check units consistency in coefficients
3. Analyze infeasibility before debugging manually
4. Use shadow prices to guide resource acquisition
5. Consider integer programming only when necessary (harder to solve)
6. Validate solution against business constraints
7. Document model assumptions clearly
## Infeasibility Handling
When model is infeasible:
1. Identify Irreducible Infeasible Subset (IIS)
2. Relax constraints using elastic variables
3. Prioritize constraint satisfaction
4. Use goal programming for conflicting objectives
## Integration Points
- Feeds into Optimization Specialist agent
- Connects with Sensitivity Analyzer for robustness
- Supports Constraint Satisfaction Solver for hybrid problems
- Integrates with Decision Visualization for solution displayRelated Skills
socket-programming
Deep integration with socket APIs for TCP/UDP programming across platforms. Execute socket operations, analyze socket options and buffer configurations, debug connection states, and generate optimized socket code for different I/O models.
triz-contradiction-solver
Skill for systematic innovation using TRIZ methodology
qiskit-nature-solver
Qiskit Nature skill for quantum chemistry and materials science applications
cnc-programming
Expert skill for CNC programming and toolpath optimization using CAM software
pymc-probabilistic-programming
PyMC for flexible Bayesian modeling
pde-solver-library
Numerical methods for partial differential equations
ode-solver-library
Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations
numerical-linear-algebra-toolkit
High-performance numerical linear algebra operations
nonlinear-optimization-solver
Solve general nonlinear optimization problems
convex-optimization-solver
Solve convex optimization problems efficiently
vehicle-routing-solver
Vehicle routing problem solver for logistics optimization with time windows, capacity constraints, and multiple depots.
linear-program-modeler
Mathematical programming skill for formulating and solving linear programming models for resource allocation, production planning, and capacity optimization.