promethee-evaluator
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) skill for outranking-based multi-criteria analysis
Best use case
promethee-evaluator is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) skill for outranking-based multi-criteria analysis
Teams using promethee-evaluator should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/promethee-evaluator/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How promethee-evaluator Compares
| Feature / Agent | promethee-evaluator | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) skill for outranking-based multi-criteria analysis
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# PROMETHEE Evaluator
## Overview
The PROMETHEE Evaluator skill implements the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation methodology for multi-criteria decision analysis. It uses outranking relations based on pairwise comparisons of alternatives, allowing for flexible preference modeling through various preference functions.
## Capabilities
- Preference function selection (Usual, U-shape, V-shape, Level, Linear, Gaussian)
- Unicriterion preference degree calculation
- Multicriteria preference index computation
- PROMETHEE I partial ranking
- PROMETHEE II complete ranking
- GAIA plane visualization
- Walking weights sensitivity analysis
- Net flow calculation
## Used By Processes
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
- Vendor Selection Analysis
- Resource Allocation Decisions
## Usage
### Preference Functions
1. **Usual (Type I)**: Binary preference (1 if better, 0 otherwise)
2. **U-shape (Type II)**: Indifference threshold q
3. **V-shape (Type III)**: Linear with preference threshold p
4. **Level (Type IV)**: Combination of q and p thresholds
5. **Linear (Type V)**: Linear between q and p thresholds
6. **Gaussian (Type VI)**: Normal distribution with sigma parameter
### Configuration Example
```python
# Define PROMETHEE configuration
config = {
"alternatives": ["Alt A", "Alt B", "Alt C", "Alt D"],
"criteria": [
{
"name": "Cost",
"weight": 0.3,
"type": "cost",
"preference_function": "linear",
"parameters": {"p": 20000, "q": 5000}
},
{
"name": "Quality",
"weight": 0.4,
"type": "benefit",
"preference_function": "gaussian",
"parameters": {"sigma": 10}
},
{
"name": "Delivery",
"weight": 0.3,
"type": "cost",
"preference_function": "v_shape",
"parameters": {"p": 5}
}
],
"performance_matrix": [
[100000, 85, 12], # Alt A
[120000, 92, 8], # Alt B
[80000, 78, 15], # Alt C
[110000, 88, 10] # Alt D
]
}
```
### Flow Calculations
- **Positive Flow (Phi+)**: How much an alternative outranks others
- **Negative Flow (Phi-)**: How much an alternative is outranked
- **Net Flow (Phi)**: Phi+ - Phi- (used for complete ranking)
### PROMETHEE I vs II
- **PROMETHEE I**: Partial ranking based on Phi+ and Phi- separately (allows incomparabilities)
- **PROMETHEE II**: Complete ranking based on net flow Phi
### GAIA Visualization
The GAIA plane provides:
- 2D projection of criteria and alternatives
- Decision axis showing weight sensitivity
- Clustering of similar alternatives
- Criteria correlation identification
## Input Schema
```json
{
"alternatives": ["string"],
"criteria": [
{
"name": "string",
"weight": "number",
"type": "benefit|cost",
"preference_function": "usual|u_shape|v_shape|level|linear|gaussian",
"parameters": "object"
}
],
"performance_matrix": "2D array of numbers",
"options": {
"method": "PROMETHEE_I|PROMETHEE_II",
"gaia_visualization": "boolean",
"sensitivity_analysis": "boolean"
}
}
```
## Output Schema
```json
{
"ranking": [
{
"alternative": "string",
"rank": "number",
"phi_plus": "number",
"phi_minus": "number",
"phi_net": "number"
}
],
"outranking_matrix": "2D array",
"partial_ranking": {
"preferred_pairs": ["object"],
"incomparable_pairs": ["object"]
},
"gaia_data": {
"alternative_coordinates": "object",
"criteria_axes": "object",
"decision_axis": "object"
},
"sensitivity_results": "object"
}
```
## Best Practices
1. Select appropriate preference functions based on criterion characteristics
2. Use PROMETHEE I when incomparabilities are meaningful
3. Set thresholds (p, q) based on domain expertise
4. Analyze GAIA plane for insights beyond rankings
5. Validate results with stakeholders
6. Compare with other MCDA methods for robustness
## Integration Points
- Receives weights from AHP Calculator or Stakeholder Preference Elicitor
- Feeds into Decision Visualization for GAIA planes
- Connects with ELECTRE Comparator for method comparison
- Supports Sensitivity Analyzer for weight robustness testingRelated Skills
pqc-evaluator
Post-quantum cryptography evaluation skill for quantum-safe migration
green-synthesis-evaluator
Sustainability assessment skill for evaluating and designing environmentally friendly nanomaterial synthesis routes
iso10993-evaluator
Biological evaluation planning skill implementing ISO 10993-1 for biocompatibility testing strategy
process-builder
Scaffold new babysitter process definitions following SDK patterns, proper structure, and best practices. Guides the 3-phase workflow from research to implementation.
babysitter
Orchestrate via @babysitter. Use this skill when asked to babysit a run, orchestrate a process or whenever it is called explicitly. (babysit, babysitter, orchestrate, orchestrate a run, workflow, etc.)
yolo
Run Babysitter autonomously with minimal manual interruption.
user-install
Install the user-level Babysitter Codex setup.
team-install
Install the team-pinned Babysitter Codex workspace setup.
retrospect
Summarize or retrospect on a completed Babysitter run.
resume
Resume an existing Babysitter run from Codex.
project-install
Install the Babysitter Codex workspace integration into the current project.
plan
Plan a Babysitter workflow without executing the run.