risk-register-manager
Risk register management skill for systematic risk identification, assessment, and tracking
Best use case
risk-register-manager is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Risk register management skill for systematic risk identification, assessment, and tracking
Teams using risk-register-manager should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/risk-register-manager/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How risk-register-manager Compares
| Feature / Agent | risk-register-manager | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Risk register management skill for systematic risk identification, assessment, and tracking
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Risk Register Manager
## Overview
The Risk Register Manager skill provides comprehensive capabilities for systematic risk identification, assessment, mitigation planning, and ongoing tracking. It supports the full risk management lifecycle from initial identification through monitoring and closure.
## Capabilities
- Risk identification and categorization
- Probability and impact scoring
- Risk matrix generation
- Risk prioritization (P*I ranking)
- Mitigation strategy tracking
- Residual risk calculation
- Risk trend analysis
- Risk report generation
## Used By Processes
- Decision Quality Assessment
- Monte Carlo Simulation for Decision Support
- Strategic Scenario Development
## Usage
### Risk Identification
```python
# Define a risk
risk_entry = {
"id": "RISK-001",
"title": "Key Supplier Bankruptcy",
"description": "Primary component supplier faces financial difficulties, risking supply continuity",
"category": "Supply Chain",
"subcategory": "Supplier Risk",
"identified_by": "Procurement Manager",
"identification_date": "2024-01-15",
"status": "Open",
"triggers": [
"Supplier credit rating downgrade",
"Delayed deliveries > 2 weeks",
"News of financial restructuring"
],
"affected_objectives": ["Production Continuity", "Cost Control"]
}
```
### Risk Assessment
```python
# Assess risk
risk_assessment = {
"risk_id": "RISK-001",
"probability": {
"score": 3, # 1-5 scale
"rationale": "Supplier shows signs of financial stress; industry downturn",
"confidence": "medium"
},
"impact": {
"financial": {"score": 4, "estimate": 2500000},
"schedule": {"score": 3, "estimate_days": 45},
"reputation": {"score": 2},
"overall": 4
},
"risk_score": 12, # P x I
"risk_level": "High",
"velocity": "Medium", # How quickly it could materialize
"assessment_date": "2024-01-20"
}
```
### Mitigation Planning
```python
# Define mitigation strategies
mitigation_plan = {
"risk_id": "RISK-001",
"response_strategy": "Mitigate", # Accept, Mitigate, Transfer, Avoid
"actions": [
{
"id": "MIT-001-A",
"description": "Qualify secondary supplier",
"owner": "Procurement Director",
"due_date": "2024-03-01",
"status": "In Progress",
"cost": 50000,
"effectiveness": 0.6 # Expected risk reduction
},
{
"id": "MIT-001-B",
"description": "Increase safety stock to 8 weeks",
"owner": "Supply Chain Manager",
"due_date": "2024-02-15",
"status": "Not Started",
"cost": 200000,
"effectiveness": 0.3
}
],
"residual_probability": 2,
"residual_impact": 3,
"residual_score": 6
}
```
### Risk Matrix Configuration
```python
# Configure risk matrix
matrix_config = {
"probability_scale": {
1: {"label": "Rare", "range": "< 10%"},
2: {"label": "Unlikely", "range": "10-25%"},
3: {"label": "Possible", "range": "25-50%"},
4: {"label": "Likely", "range": "50-75%"},
5: {"label": "Almost Certain", "range": "> 75%"}
},
"impact_scale": {
1: {"label": "Negligible", "financial": "< $10K"},
2: {"label": "Minor", "financial": "$10K - $100K"},
3: {"label": "Moderate", "financial": "$100K - $1M"},
4: {"label": "Major", "financial": "$1M - $10M"},
5: {"label": "Severe", "financial": "> $10M"}
},
"risk_levels": {
"Low": {"range": [1, 4], "color": "green"},
"Medium": {"range": [5, 9], "color": "yellow"},
"High": {"range": [10, 16], "color": "orange"},
"Critical": {"range": [17, 25], "color": "red"}
}
}
```
## Input Schema
```json
{
"operation": "create|update|assess|report",
"risk": {
"id": "string",
"title": "string",
"description": "string",
"category": "string"
},
"assessment": {
"probability": "object",
"impact": "object"
},
"mitigation": {
"strategy": "string",
"actions": ["object"]
},
"report_options": {
"format": "matrix|list|dashboard",
"filters": "object"
}
}
```
## Output Schema
```json
{
"risk_register": [
{
"id": "string",
"title": "string",
"category": "string",
"inherent_score": "number",
"residual_score": "number",
"status": "string",
"owner": "string",
"next_review": "string"
}
],
"summary_statistics": {
"total_risks": "number",
"by_level": "object",
"by_category": "object",
"trend": "object"
},
"risk_matrix": "object",
"top_risks": ["object"],
"overdue_mitigations": ["object"],
"report_path": "string"
}
```
## Best Practices
1. Review and update risk register regularly (monthly minimum)
2. Assign clear ownership for each risk
3. Document rationale for probability and impact scores
4. Track both inherent and residual risk
5. Include positive risks (opportunities)
6. Escalate critical risks promptly
7. Learn from risks that materialized
## Risk Response Strategies
| Strategy | When to Use | Example |
|----------|-------------|---------|
| Avoid | High P, High I, feasible to eliminate | Cancel risky project phase |
| Mitigate | Reduce P or I is cost-effective | Add quality controls |
| Transfer | Impact can be shifted | Insurance, contracts |
| Accept | Low priority or unavoidable | Budget contingency |
## Integration Points
- Feeds into Monte Carlo Engine for quantitative analysis
- Connects with Value at Risk Calculator for financial risk
- Supports Risk Analyst agent
- Integrates with Decision Visualization for risk matricesRelated Skills
vendor-risk-monitor
Continuous vendor security monitoring for security ratings, breach notifications, and risk change detection
plugin-registry-manager
Manage SDK plugin discovery and registration
deprecation-manager
Manage API and SDK deprecation lifecycle
api-key-manager
API key generation, rotation, and management system
Register Allocation
Expert skill for register allocation algorithms including graph coloring, linear scan, and spill code generation
risk-mitigation-planning
Develop comprehensive risk management plans for collections and cultural venues including disaster preparedness, security protocols, and insurance coordination
zotero-reference-manager
Reference management for bibliography organization, annotation sync, and citation formatting
data-versioning-manager
Skill for managing data versions and provenance
nanosensor-calibration-manager
Nanosensor characterization skill for calibration, sensitivity analysis, and selectivity validation
nanomaterial-lims-manager
Laboratory Information Management System skill for nanomaterial sample tracking and data management
ligand-exchange-protocol-manager
Surface chemistry skill for managing ligand exchange reactions, bioconjugation protocols, and functional group quantification
cleanroom-protocol-manager
Cleanroom operations skill for managing protocols, contamination control, and process flows