time-study-analyzer
Time study analysis skill with stopwatch methods, performance rating, and standard time calculation.
Best use case
time-study-analyzer is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Time study analysis skill with stopwatch methods, performance rating, and standard time calculation.
Teams using time-study-analyzer should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/time-study-analyzer/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How time-study-analyzer Compares
| Feature / Agent | time-study-analyzer | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Time study analysis skill with stopwatch methods, performance rating, and standard time calculation.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# time-study-analyzer
You are **time-study-analyzer** - a specialized skill for time study analysis including stopwatch methods, performance rating, and standard time calculation.
## Overview
This skill enables AI-powered time study analysis including:
- Stopwatch time study
- Element breakdown and timing
- Performance rating application
- Allowance calculation
- Standard time development
- Sample size determination
- Statistical analysis of observations
- Predetermined time systems (MTM)
## Capabilities
### 1. Time Study Data Collection
```python
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from scipy import stats
def analyze_time_study(observations: pd.DataFrame):
"""
Analyze time study observations
observations: DataFrame with columns ['element', 'cycle', 'time', 'rating']
"""
results = {}
for element in observations['element'].unique():
element_data = observations[observations['element'] == element]
# Basic statistics
times = element_data['time'].values
ratings = element_data['rating'].values
# Identify outliers using IQR method
q1, q3 = np.percentile(times, [25, 75])
iqr = q3 - q1
lower_bound = q1 - 1.5 * iqr
upper_bound = q3 + 1.5 * iqr
valid_mask = (times >= lower_bound) & (times <= upper_bound)
valid_times = times[valid_mask]
valid_ratings = ratings[valid_mask]
# Calculate observed time
observed_time = np.mean(valid_times)
# Calculate average performance rating
avg_rating = np.mean(valid_ratings) / 100 # Convert to decimal
# Normal time = Observed time × Rating
normal_time = observed_time * avg_rating
results[element] = {
'observations': len(times),
'outliers_removed': len(times) - len(valid_times),
'observed_time': round(observed_time, 3),
'std_dev': round(np.std(valid_times), 3),
'avg_rating': round(avg_rating * 100, 1),
'normal_time': round(normal_time, 3)
}
return {
"elements": results,
"total_normal_time": sum(e['normal_time'] for e in results.values())
}
```
### 2. Performance Rating
```python
def apply_performance_rating(observed_time: float, rating_method: str,
rating_factors: dict = None):
"""
Apply performance rating to observed time
rating_method: 'pace', 'westinghouse', 'synthetic', 'objective'
rating_factors: method-specific factors
"""
if rating_method == 'pace':
# Simple pace rating (100 = normal)
rating = rating_factors.get('pace', 100) / 100
normal_time = observed_time * rating
elif rating_method == 'westinghouse':
# Westinghouse system with four factors
skill = rating_factors.get('skill', 0) # -0.22 to +0.15
effort = rating_factors.get('effort', 0) # -0.17 to +0.13
conditions = rating_factors.get('conditions', 0) # -0.07 to +0.06
consistency = rating_factors.get('consistency', 0) # -0.04 to +0.04
total_adjustment = skill + effort + conditions + consistency
rating = 1 + total_adjustment
normal_time = observed_time * rating
elif rating_method == 'synthetic':
# Based on predetermined time comparison
benchmark_time = rating_factors.get('benchmark_time', observed_time)
rating = benchmark_time / observed_time
normal_time = benchmark_time # Use benchmark as normal
elif rating_method == 'objective':
# Based on pace and difficulty
pace = rating_factors.get('pace', 100) / 100
difficulty = rating_factors.get('difficulty', 1.0)
rating = pace * difficulty
normal_time = observed_time * rating
else:
rating = 1.0
normal_time = observed_time
return {
"method": rating_method,
"observed_time": observed_time,
"rating": round(rating * 100, 1),
"normal_time": round(normal_time, 3),
"factors_applied": rating_factors
}
def westinghouse_lookup():
"""Return Westinghouse rating tables"""
return {
"skill": {
"A1 - Superskill": 0.15, "A2 - Superskill": 0.13,
"B1 - Excellent": 0.11, "B2 - Excellent": 0.08,
"C1 - Good": 0.06, "C2 - Good": 0.03,
"D - Average": 0.00,
"E1 - Fair": -0.05, "E2 - Fair": -0.10,
"F1 - Poor": -0.16, "F2 - Poor": -0.22
},
"effort": {
"A1 - Excessive": 0.13, "A2 - Excessive": 0.12,
"B1 - Excellent": 0.10, "B2 - Excellent": 0.08,
"C1 - Good": 0.05, "C2 - Good": 0.02,
"D - Average": 0.00,
"E1 - Fair": -0.04, "E2 - Fair": -0.08,
"F1 - Poor": -0.12, "F2 - Poor": -0.17
},
"conditions": {
"A - Ideal": 0.06, "B - Excellent": 0.04,
"C - Good": 0.02, "D - Average": 0.00,
"E - Fair": -0.03, "F - Poor": -0.07
},
"consistency": {
"A - Perfect": 0.04, "B - Excellent": 0.03,
"C - Good": 0.01, "D - Average": 0.00,
"E - Fair": -0.02, "F - Poor": -0.04
}
}
```
### 3. Allowance Calculation
```python
def calculate_allowances(normal_time: float, allowance_factors: dict):
"""
Calculate allowances and standard time
allowance_factors:
- personal: percentage (typically 5%)
- fatigue: percentage (varies by job)
- delay: percentage (unavoidable delays)
- special: any special allowances
"""
personal = allowance_factors.get('personal', 5)
fatigue = allowance_factors.get('fatigue', 4)
delay = allowance_factors.get('delay', 5)
special = allowance_factors.get('special', 0)
# Total allowance percentage
total_allowance_pct = personal + fatigue + delay + special
# Calculate standard time
# Method 1: Add to normal time
allowance_time = normal_time * (total_allowance_pct / 100)
standard_time_add = normal_time + allowance_time
# Method 2: Divide by (1 - allowance factor) - more common
pfd_factor = total_allowance_pct / 100
standard_time_mult = normal_time / (1 - pfd_factor) if pfd_factor < 1 else normal_time * 2
return {
"normal_time": round(normal_time, 3),
"allowances": {
"personal": personal,
"fatigue": fatigue,
"delay": delay,
"special": special,
"total_percent": total_allowance_pct
},
"standard_time": round(standard_time_mult, 3),
"method": "multiplicative",
"pieces_per_hour": round(60 / standard_time_mult, 1) if standard_time_mult > 0 else 0
}
```
### 4. Sample Size Determination
```python
def determine_sample_size(pilot_data: list, confidence: float = 0.95,
accuracy: float = 0.05):
"""
Determine required sample size for time study
pilot_data: initial observations
confidence: confidence level (0.95 or 0.99 typical)
accuracy: desired accuracy as proportion of mean (e.g., 0.05 = ±5%)
"""
n_pilot = len(pilot_data)
mean = np.mean(pilot_data)
std_dev = np.std(pilot_data, ddof=1)
cv = std_dev / mean # Coefficient of variation
# Z-score for confidence level
z = stats.norm.ppf(1 - (1 - confidence) / 2)
# Required sample size
# n = (z * s / (A * x̄))²
# where A is desired accuracy proportion
required_n = (z * std_dev / (accuracy * mean)) ** 2
# Adjust for small samples using t-distribution
if required_n < 30:
t_value = stats.t.ppf(1 - (1 - confidence) / 2, df=max(n_pilot - 1, 1))
required_n = (t_value * std_dev / (accuracy * mean)) ** 2
return {
"pilot_observations": n_pilot,
"pilot_mean": round(mean, 3),
"pilot_std_dev": round(std_dev, 3),
"coefficient_of_variation": round(cv, 3),
"confidence_level": confidence,
"desired_accuracy": accuracy,
"required_sample_size": int(np.ceil(required_n)),
"additional_observations_needed": max(0, int(np.ceil(required_n)) - n_pilot)
}
```
### 5. Element Breakdown
```python
def create_element_breakdown(task_description: str, elements: list):
"""
Document element breakdown for time study
elements: list of {'name': str, 'description': str, 'type': str, 'breakpoint': str}
"""
breakdown = []
for i, elem in enumerate(elements):
breakdown.append({
'element_number': i + 1,
'name': elem['name'],
'description': elem['description'],
'type': elem.get('type', 'regular'), # regular, occasional, foreign
'breakpoint': elem.get('breakpoint', ''), # endpoint description
'machine_controlled': elem.get('machine_controlled', False),
'frequency': elem.get('frequency', 1.0) # times per cycle
})
return {
"task": task_description,
"element_count": len(breakdown),
"elements": breakdown,
"element_types": {
"regular": sum(1 for e in breakdown if e['type'] == 'regular'),
"occasional": sum(1 for e in breakdown if e['type'] == 'occasional'),
"foreign": sum(1 for e in breakdown if e['type'] == 'foreign')
}
}
```
### 6. Standard Time Summary
```python
def create_standard_time_summary(elements: list, allowances: dict,
frequency_adjustments: dict = None):
"""
Create comprehensive standard time summary
"""
total_normal_time = 0
element_details = []
for elem in elements:
frequency = frequency_adjustments.get(elem['name'], 1.0) if frequency_adjustments else 1.0
adjusted_time = elem['normal_time'] * frequency
element_details.append({
'element': elem['name'],
'normal_time': elem['normal_time'],
'frequency': frequency,
'adjusted_time': round(adjusted_time, 3)
})
total_normal_time += adjusted_time
# Apply allowances
allowance_result = calculate_allowances(total_normal_time, allowances)
return {
"elements": element_details,
"total_normal_time": round(total_normal_time, 3),
"standard_time": allowance_result['standard_time'],
"allowances": allowance_result['allowances'],
"production_standards": {
"pieces_per_hour": round(60 / allowance_result['standard_time'], 1),
"pieces_per_shift_8hr": round(480 / allowance_result['standard_time'], 0),
"hours_per_100": round(100 * allowance_result['standard_time'] / 60, 2)
}
}
```
## Process Integration
This skill integrates with the following processes:
- `work-measurement-analysis.js`
- `standard-work-development.js`
- `labor-cost-estimation.js`
## Output Format
```json
{
"time_study": {
"task": "Assembly Operation A",
"elements": [
{"element": "Get parts", "observed": 0.15, "rating": 95, "normal": 0.143},
{"element": "Position", "observed": 0.22, "rating": 100, "normal": 0.220}
],
"total_normal_time": 1.45
},
"standard_time": {
"normal_time": 1.45,
"allowance_percent": 15,
"standard_time": 1.71
},
"production_standards": {
"pieces_per_hour": 35.1,
"hours_per_100": 2.85
},
"sample_analysis": {
"required_observations": 25,
"confidence": 95,
"accuracy": "±5%"
}
}
```
## Best Practices
1. **Define elements clearly** - Consistent breakpoints
2. **Trained observers** - Consistent rating is critical
3. **Multiple cycles** - Statistical significance
4. **Document conditions** - Workplace, tools, materials
5. **Worker cooperation** - Explain purpose
6. **Verify with workers** - They should agree it's achievable
## Constraints
- Rating is subjective and requires training
- Workers may not perform at normal pace
- Element variation increases sample needs
- Machine-paced elements don't need ratingRelated Skills
terraform-analyzer
Specialized skill for analyzing Terraform configurations. Supports parsing, security scanning (tfsec, checkov), cost estimation (infracost), drift detection, and plan visualization across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
db-query-analyzer
Analyze database query performance with execution plans and index recommendations
code-complexity-analyzer
Analyze code complexity metrics including cyclomatic complexity, code smells, and technical debt
cloudformation-analyzer
Validate and analyze AWS CloudFormation templates for security and best practices
semantic-code-analyzer
LLM-powered semantic analysis of code diffs to detect business-logic trojans
sast-analyzer
Static Application Security Testing orchestration and analysis. Execute Semgrep, Bandit, ESLint security plugins, CodeQL, and other SAST tools. Parse, prioritize, and deduplicate findings across multiple tools with remediation guidance.
crypto-analyzer
Cryptographic implementation analysis and validation for encryption algorithms, key sizes, and certificate management
semver-analyzer
Analyze code changes and determine semantic version bumps. Detect breaking changes automatically, suggest version bump (major/minor/patch), generate changelog entries, and validate version consistency.
api-diff-analyzer
Compare API specifications to detect breaking changes. Compare OpenAPI spec versions, categorize changes by severity, generate migration guides, and block breaking changes in CI.
process-analyzer
Analyze processes, identify workflows, define boundaries and scope, and map process requirements for specialization creation.
opencl-runtime
Cross-vendor OpenCL runtime management and kernel development. Query platforms/devices, generate portable OpenCL C kernel code, handle vendor-specific extensions, manage contexts and command queues, compile and cache programs.
scope-logic-analyzer
Test equipment integration for signal analysis (oscilloscope and logic analyzer)