Root Cause Tracing
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
Best use case
Root Cause Tracing is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
Teams using Root Cause Tracing should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/sp-root-cause-tracing/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Root Cause Tracing Compares
| Feature / Agent | Root Cause Tracing | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Root Cause Tracing
## Overview
Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.
**Core principle:** Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.
## When to Use
```dot
digraph when_to_use {
"Bug appears deep in stack?" [shape=diamond];
"Can trace backwards?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix at symptom point" [shape=box];
"Trace to original trigger" [shape=box];
"BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth" [shape=box];
"Bug appears deep in stack?" -> "Can trace backwards?" [label="yes"];
"Can trace backwards?" -> "Trace to original trigger" [label="yes"];
"Can trace backwards?" -> "Fix at symptom point" [label="no - dead end"];
"Trace to original trigger" -> "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth";
}
```
**Use when:**
- Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
- Stack trace shows long call chain
- Unclear where invalid data originated
- Need to find which test/code triggers the problem
## The Tracing Process
### 1. Observe the Symptom
```
Error: git init failed in /Users/jesse/project/packages/core
```
### 2. Find Immediate Cause
**What code directly causes this?**
```typescript
await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: projectDir });
```
### 3. Ask: What Called This?
```typescript
WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir, sessionId)
→ called by Session.initializeWorkspace()
→ called by Session.create()
→ called by test at Project.create()
```
### 4. Keep Tracing Up
**What value was passed?**
- `projectDir = ''` (empty string!)
- Empty string as `cwd` resolves to `process.cwd()`
- That's the source code directory!
### 5. Find Original Trigger
**Where did empty string come from?**
```typescript
const context = setupCoreTest(); // Returns { tempDir: '' }
Project.create('name', context.tempDir); // Accessed before beforeEach!
```
## Adding Stack Traces
When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation:
```typescript
// Before the problematic operation
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
const stack = new Error().stack;
console.error('DEBUG git init:', {
directory,
cwd: process.cwd(),
nodeEnv: process.env.NODE_ENV,
stack,
});
await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: directory });
}
```
**Critical:** Use `console.error()` in tests (not logger - may not show)
**Run and capture:**
```bash
npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG git init'
```
**Analyze stack traces:**
- Look for test file names
- Find the line number triggering the call
- Identify the pattern (same test? same parameter?)
## Finding Which Test Causes Pollution
If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh
```bash
./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'
```
Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.
## Real Example: Empty projectDir
**Symptom:** `.git` created in `packages/core/` (source code)
**Trace chain:**
1. `git init` runs in `process.cwd()` ← empty cwd parameter
2. WorktreeManager called with empty projectDir
3. Session.create() passed empty string
4. Test accessed `context.tempDir` before beforeEach
5. setupCoreTest() returns `{ tempDir: '' }` initially
**Root cause:** Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value
**Fix:** Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach
**Also added defense-in-depth:**
- Layer 1: Project.create() validates directory
- Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty
- Layer 3: NODE_ENV guard refuses git init outside tmpdir
- Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
## Key Principle
```dot
digraph principle {
"Found immediate cause" [shape=ellipse];
"Can trace one level up?" [shape=diamond];
"Trace backwards" [shape=box];
"Is this the source?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix at source" [shape=box];
"Add validation at each layer" [shape=box];
"Bug impossible" [shape=doublecircle];
"NEVER fix just the symptom" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red, fontcolor=white];
"Found immediate cause" -> "Can trace one level up?";
"Can trace one level up?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="yes"];
"Can trace one level up?" -> "NEVER fix just the symptom" [label="no"];
"Trace backwards" -> "Is this the source?";
"Is this the source?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="no - keeps going"];
"Is this the source?" -> "Fix at source" [label="yes"];
"Fix at source" -> "Add validation at each layer";
"Add validation at each layer" -> "Bug impossible";
}
```
**NEVER fix just where the error appears.** Trace back to find the original trigger.
## Stack Trace Tips
**In tests:** Use `console.error()` not logger - logger may be suppressed
**Before operation:** Log before the dangerous operation, not after it fails
**Include context:** Directory, cwd, environment variables, timestamps
**Capture stack:** `new Error().stack` shows complete call chain
## Real-World Impact
From debugging session (2025-10-03):
- Found root cause through 5-level trace
- Fixed at source (getter validation)
- Added 4 layers of defense
- 1847 tests passed, zero pollutionRelated Skills
Tracing Knowledge Lineages
Understand how ideas evolved over time to find old solutions for new problems and avoid repeating past failures
distributed-tracing
Implement distributed tracing with Jaeger and Tempo for request flow visibility across microservices.
wemp-operator
> 微信公众号全功能运营——草稿/发布/评论/用户/素材/群发/统计/菜单/二维码 API 封装
zsxq-smart-publish
Publish and manage content on 知识星球 (zsxq.com). Supports talk posts, Q&A, long articles, file sharing, digest/bookmark, homework tasks, and tag management. Use when publishing content to 知识星球, creating/editing posts, uploading files/images/audio, managing digests, batch publishing, or formatting content for 知识星球.
zoom-automation
Automate Zoom meeting creation, management, recordings, webinars, and participant tracking via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
zoho-crm-automation
Automate Zoho CRM tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create/update records, search contacts, manage leads, and convert leads. Always search tools first for current schemas.
ziliu-publisher
字流(Ziliu) - AI驱动的多平台内容分发工具。用于一次创作、智能适配排版、一键分发到16+平台(公众号/知乎/小红书/B站/抖音/微博/X等)。当用户需要多平台发布、内容排版、格式适配时使用。触发词:字流、ziliu、多平台发布、一键分发、内容分发、排版发布。
zhihu-post-skill
> 知乎文章发布——知乎平台内容创作与发布自动化
zendesk-automation
Automate Zendesk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tickets, users, organizations, replies. Always search tools first for current schemas.
youtube-knowledge-extractor
This skill performs deep analysis of YouTube videos through **both information channels** Multimodal YouTube video analysis through both audio (transcript) and visual (frame extraction + image analysis) channels. Especially powerful for HowTo videos, tutorials, demos, and explainer videos where what is SHOWN (screenshots, UI demos, diagrams, code, physical actions) is just as important as what is SAID. Use this skill whenever a user wants to analyze, summarize, or create step-by-step guides from YouTube videos, or when they share a YouTube URL and want to understand what happens in the video. Triggers on requests like "Analyze this YouTube video", "Create a step-by-step guide from this video", "What does this video show?", "Summarize this tutorial", or any YouTube URL shared with analysis intent.
youtube-factory
Generate complete YouTube videos from a single prompt - script, voiceover, stock footage, captions, thumbnail. Self-contained, no external modules. 100% free tools.
youtube-automation
Automate YouTube tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): upload videos, manage playlists, search content, get analytics, and handle comments. Always search tools first for current schemas.