m15-anti-pattern

Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is this bad, idiomatic way, beginner mistake, fighting borrow checker, clone everywhere, unwrap in production, should I refactor, 反模式, 常见错误, 代码异味, 最佳实践, 地道写法

984 stars

Best use case

m15-anti-pattern is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is this bad, idiomatic way, beginner mistake, fighting borrow checker, clone everywhere, unwrap in production, should I refactor, 反模式, 常见错误, 代码异味, 最佳实践, 地道写法

Teams using m15-anti-pattern should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/m15-anti-pattern/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/actionbook/rust-skills/main/skills/m15-anti-pattern/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/m15-anti-pattern/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How m15-anti-pattern Compares

Feature / Agentm15-anti-patternStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is this bad, idiomatic way, beginner mistake, fighting borrow checker, clone everywhere, unwrap in production, should I refactor, 反模式, 常见错误, 代码异味, 最佳实践, 地道写法

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Anti-Patterns

> **Layer 2: Design Choices**

## Core Question

**Is this pattern hiding a design problem?**

When reviewing code:
- Is this solving the symptom or the cause?
- Is there a more idiomatic approach?
- Does this fight or flow with Rust?

---

## Anti-Pattern → Better Pattern

| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better |
|--------------|---------|--------|
| `.clone()` everywhere | Hides ownership issues | Proper references or ownership |
| `.unwrap()` in production | Runtime panics | `?`, `expect`, or handling |
| `Rc` when single owner | Unnecessary overhead | Simple ownership |
| `unsafe` for convenience | UB risk | Find safe pattern |
| OOP via `Deref` | Misleading API | Composition, traits |
| Giant match arms | Unmaintainable | Extract to methods |
| `String` everywhere | Allocation waste | `&str`, `Cow<str>` |
| Ignoring `#[must_use]` | Lost errors | Handle or `let _ =` |

---

## Thinking Prompt

When seeing suspicious code:

1. **Is this symptom or cause?**
   - Clone to avoid borrow? → Ownership design issue
   - Unwrap "because it won't fail"? → Unhandled case

2. **What would idiomatic code look like?**
   - References instead of clones
   - Iterators instead of index loops
   - Pattern matching instead of flags

3. **Does this fight Rust?**
   - Fighting borrow checker → restructure
   - Excessive unsafe → find safe pattern

---

## Trace Up ↑

To design understanding:

```
"Why does my code have so many clones?"
    ↑ Ask: Is the ownership model correct?
    ↑ Check: m09-domain (data flow design)
    ↑ Check: m01-ownership (reference patterns)
```

| Anti-Pattern | Trace To | Question |
|--------------|----------|----------|
| Clone everywhere | m01-ownership | Who should own this data? |
| Unwrap everywhere | m06-error-handling | What's the error strategy? |
| Rc everywhere | m09-domain | Is ownership clear? |
| Fighting lifetimes | m09-domain | Should data structure change? |

---

## Trace Down ↓

To implementation (Layer 1):

```
"Replace clone with proper ownership"
    ↓ m01-ownership: Reference patterns
    ↓ m02-resource: Smart pointer if needed

"Replace unwrap with proper handling"
    ↓ m06-error-handling: ? operator
    ↓ m06-error-handling: expect with message
```

---

## Top 5 Beginner Mistakes

| Rank | Mistake | Fix |
|------|---------|-----|
| 1 | Clone to escape borrow checker | Use references |
| 2 | Unwrap in production | Propagate with `?` |
| 3 | String for everything | Use `&str` |
| 4 | Index loops | Use iterators |
| 5 | Fighting lifetimes | Restructure to own data |

## Code Smell → Refactoring

| Smell | Indicates | Refactoring |
|-------|-----------|-------------|
| Many `.clone()` | Ownership unclear | Clarify data flow |
| Many `.unwrap()` | Error handling missing | Add proper handling |
| Many `pub` fields | Encapsulation broken | Private + accessors |
| Deep nesting | Complex logic | Extract methods |
| Long functions | Multiple responsibilities | Split |
| Giant enums | Missing abstraction | Trait + types |

---

## Common Error Patterns

| Error | Anti-Pattern Cause | Fix |
|-------|-------------------|-----|
| E0382 use after move | Cloning vs ownership | Proper references |
| Panic in production | Unwrap everywhere | ?, matching |
| Slow performance | String for all text | &str, Cow |
| Borrow checker fights | Wrong structure | Restructure |
| Memory bloat | Rc/Arc everywhere | Simple ownership |

---

## Deprecated → Better

| Deprecated | Better |
|------------|--------|
| Index-based loops | `.iter()`, `.enumerate()` |
| `collect::<Vec<_>>()` then iterate | Chain iterators |
| Manual unsafe cell | `Cell`, `RefCell` |
| `mem::transmute` for casts | `as` or `TryFrom` |
| Custom linked list | `Vec`, `VecDeque` |
| `lazy_static!` | `std::sync::OnceLock` |

---

## Quick Review Checklist

- [ ] No `.clone()` without justification
- [ ] No `.unwrap()` in library code
- [ ] No `pub` fields with invariants
- [ ] No index loops when iterator works
- [ ] No `String` where `&str` suffices
- [ ] No ignored `#[must_use]` warnings
- [ ] No `unsafe` without SAFETY comment
- [ ] No giant functions (>50 lines)

---

## Related Skills

| When | See |
|------|-----|
| Ownership patterns | m01-ownership |
| Error handling | m06-error-handling |
| Mental models | m14-mental-model |
| Performance | m10-performance |

Related Skills

unsafe-checker

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

CRITICAL: Use for unsafe Rust code review and FFI. Triggers on: unsafe, raw pointer, FFI, extern, transmute, *mut, *const, union, #[repr(C)], libc, std::ffi, MaybeUninit, NonNull, SAFETY comment, soundness, undefined behavior, UB, safe wrapper, memory layout, bindgen, cbindgen, CString, CStr, 安全抽象, 裸指针, 外部函数接口, 内存布局, 不安全代码, FFI 绑定, 未定义行为

rust-trait-explorer

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Explore Rust trait implementations using LSP. Triggers on: /trait-impl, find implementations, who implements, trait 实现, 谁实现了, 实现了哪些trait

rust-symbol-analyzer

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Analyze Rust project structure using LSP symbols. Triggers on: /symbols, project structure, list structs, list traits, list functions, 符号分析, 项目结构, 列出所有, 有哪些struct

rust-skill-creator

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Use when creating skills for Rust crates or std library documentation. Keywords: create rust skill, create crate skill, create std skill, 创建 rust skill, 创建 crate skill, 创建 std skill, 动态 rust skill, 动态 crate skill, skill for tokio, skill for serde, skill for axum, generate rust skill, rust 技能, crate 技能, 从文档创建skill, from docs create skill

rust-router

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

CRITICAL: Use for ALL Rust questions including errors, design, and coding. HIGHEST PRIORITY for: 比较, 对比, compare, vs, versus, 区别, difference, 最佳实践, best practice, tokio vs, async-std vs, 比较 tokio, 比较 async, Triggers on: Rust, cargo, rustc, crate, Cargo.toml, 意图分析, 问题分析, 语义分析, analyze intent, question analysis, compile error, borrow error, lifetime error, ownership error, type error, trait error, value moved, cannot borrow, does not live long enough, mismatched types, not satisfied, E0382, E0597, E0277, E0308, E0499, E0502, E0596, async, await, Send, Sync, tokio, concurrency, error handling, 编译错误, compile error, 所有权, ownership, 借用, borrow, 生命周期, lifetime, 类型错误, type error, 异步, async, 并发, concurrency, 错误处理, error handling, 问题, problem, question, 怎么用, how to use, 如何, how to, 为什么, why, 什么是, what is, 帮我写, help me write, 实现, implement, 解释, explain

rust-refactor-helper

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Safe Rust refactoring with LSP analysis. Triggers on: /refactor, rename symbol, move function, extract, 重构, 重命名, 提取函数, 安全重构

rust-learner

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Use when asking about Rust versions or crate info. Keywords: latest version, what's new, changelog, Rust 1.x, Rust release, stable, nightly, crate info, crates.io, lib.rs, docs.rs, API documentation, crate features, dependencies, which crate, what version, Rust edition, edition 2021, edition 2024, cargo add, cargo update, 最新版本, 版本号, 稳定版, 最新, 哪个版本, crate 信息, 文档, 依赖, Rust 版本, 新特性, 有什么特性

rust-deps-visualizer

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Visualize Rust project dependencies as ASCII art. Triggers on: /deps-viz, dependency graph, show dependencies, visualize deps, 依赖图, 依赖可视化, 显示依赖

rust-daily

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

CRITICAL: Use for Rust news and daily/weekly/monthly reports. Triggers on: rust news, rust daily, rust weekly, TWIR, rust blog, Rust 日报, Rust 周报, Rust 新闻, Rust 动态

rust-code-navigator

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Navigate Rust code using LSP. Triggers on: /navigate, go to definition, find references, where is defined, 跳转定义, 查找引用, 定义在哪, 谁用了这个

rust-call-graph

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

Visualize Rust function call graphs using LSP. Triggers on: /call-graph, call hierarchy, who calls, what calls, 调用图, 调用关系, 谁调用了, 调用了谁

meta-cognition-parallel

984
from actionbook/rust-skills

EXPERIMENTAL: Three-layer parallel meta-cognition analysis. Triggers on: /meta-parallel, 三层分析, parallel analysis, 并行元认知