diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
Best use case
diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
Teams using diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 Compares
| Feature / Agent | diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Clinical Study Bias Assessment (QUADAS-2)
This skill evaluates clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias and applicability concerns using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
## When to Use
- Use this skill when you need analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the quadas-2 tool. use when claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "assess this paper using quadas-2") in a reproducible workflow.
- Use this skill when a data analytics task needs a packaged method instead of ad-hoc freeform output.
- Use this skill when the user expects a concrete deliverable, validation step, or file-based result.
- Use this skill when `scripts/pdf_extractor.py` is the most direct path to complete the request.
- Use this skill when you need the `diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2` package behavior rather than a generic answer.
## Key Features
- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/pdf_extractor.py` plus 1 additional script(s).
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Reusable packaged asset(s), including `assets/example_asset.txt`.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.
## Dependencies
- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `Third-party packages`: `not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package`. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.
## Example Usage
```bash
cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2"
python -m py_compile scripts/pdf_extractor.py
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py --help
```
Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/pdf_extractor.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.
## Implementation Details
See `## Workflow` above for related details.
- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/pdf_extractor.py` with additional helper scripts under `scripts/`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Packaged assets: reusable files are available under `assets/`.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.
## Workflow
To assess a study, follow these steps:
1. **Analyze Patient Selection**:
* Assess if the sample was consecutive or random.
* Check for case-control design (should be avoided).
* Check for inappropriate exclusions.
* See `references/quadas_2_criteria.md` for detailed signaling questions.
2. **Analyze Index Test**:
* Assess if the index test results were interpreted without knowledge of the reference standard.
* Check if the threshold was pre-specified.
3. **Analyze Reference Standard**:
* Assess if the reference standard correctly classifies the target condition.
* Check if reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the index test.
4. **Analyze Flow and Timing**:
* Assess the interval between index test and reference standard.
* Check if all patients received the reference standard (and the same one).
* Check if all patients were included in the analysis.
## Output Format
For each domain (Patient Selection, Index Test, Reference Standard, Flow and Timing), you MUST output the findings in the following structure:
```markdown
### [Domain Name]
**[Signaling Question 1]?**
- Comments: [Explanation in Chinese]
- Quote: [Original text quote]
- Answer: [Yes/No/Unclear]
... (Repeat for all signaling questions)
```
## Quality Rules
1. **Language**: Explanations (Comments) must be in Chinese.
2. **Evidence**: Every judgment must be supported by a direct quote from the paper.
3. **Strictness**: If information is missing, select "Unclear". Do not guess.
## PDF Parsing Tool
For processing PDF literature, you can use the provided Python script:
```bash
# Install dependencies
pip install PyPDF2
# Extract full text
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py "paper.pdf"
# Extract specific page range
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py "paper.pdf" 5 15
```
The script will automatically extract the text, which you can then copy and send to me for QUADAS-2 assessment.
## References
- [QUADAS-2 Criteria](references/quadas_2_criteria.md): Detailed signaling questions and judgment guidelines.Related Skills
clinical-study-info-extractor
Batch extracts and verifies structured information (PMID, title, abstract, methodology, results, etc.) from clinical research literature using PMIDs. Use when the user wants to extract details from specific PMIDs.
study-design-scale-selector
Determines the appropriate Risk of Bias assessment scale for a medical study based on its design (RCT, Cohort, etc.), using PubMed metadata lookup or text analysis. Use when the user wants to know which quality assessment tool to use for a specific paper (given PMID or abstract).
rct-bias-assessment-rob2
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias.
quapas-quality-assessment-for-prognosis-studies
Evaluates bias in medical literature (prognosis studies) using QUAPAS criteria. Use when the user wants to assess the quality or risk of bias of a medical paper text.
quality-assessment
Automates critical appraisal and quality assessment for research papers by analyzing text against established methodological standards (such as risk of bias tools, quality checklists, or reporting guidelines) and synthesizing a structured evaluation report. Use when you need to assess the methodological quality, internal validity, or reporting completeness of any type of study—including RCTs, observational studies, systematic reviews, qualitative research, or diagnostic accuracy studies.
probast-quality-assessment-for-prediction-model-studies
Assess bias in medical prediction model studies using PROBAST tool. Use when user wants to evaluate the quality or risk of bias of a medical paper (text or PDF).
cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos
Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Use when the user provides a cohort study article or text and needs a quality assessment report.
case-control-study-quality-assessment-nos
Clinical Research Bias Assessment - Case-Control Study (NOS) v2.3.0. Use when you need to assess the bias of a case-control study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria, or when evaluating the quality of a medical paper.
study-limitations-drafter
Use study limitations drafter for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
tumor-immune-infiltration-diagnostic-ml
Generates complete tumor immune-infiltration-guided bulk-transcriptome diagnostic biomarker and machine-learning research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, immune infiltration estimation, immune-linked module discovery, consensus feature selection, diagnostic modeling, nomogram construction, clinical association, and optional prognostic extension or validation. Covers five study patterns (immune-cell-first diagnostic workflow, immune-module-to-biomarker workflow, consensus-ML biomarker workflow, diagnostic-plus-prognostic hybrid workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, reference literature pack, and self-critical risk review.
translational-study-blueprint
Designs a translational blueprint for moving a biomedical finding toward diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response prediction, patient stratification, or therapeutic development, with explicit translational milestones, validation thresholds, and feasibility-sensitive route framing.
study-objective-refiner
Refines broad, vague, or aspirational biomedical research objectives into clear, bounded, measurable, executable, and downstream-ready study objective statements. Always use this skill when a user has a general aim such as “explore a mechanism,” “study prognosis,” “investigate biomarkers,” or “look at treatment response,” but the objective is still too broad, non-operational, or too ambiguous to support protocol framing, design selection, analysis planning, or hypothesis design. Never assume that polished wording alone means the objective is actionable. Focus first on objective type, missing operational elements, scope discipline, and downstream-ready formulation.