drug-interaction-checker
Check for interactions between multiple medications, including severity classification and mechanism explanations.
Best use case
drug-interaction-checker is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Check for interactions between multiple medications, including severity classification and mechanism explanations.
Teams using drug-interaction-checker should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/drug-interaction-checker/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How drug-interaction-checker Compares
| Feature / Agent | drug-interaction-checker | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Check for interactions between multiple medications, including severity classification and mechanism explanations.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Drug Interaction Checker
Check for interactions between multiple medications, including severity classification and mechanism explanations.
## When to Use
- Use this skill when the task needs Check for interactions between multiple medications, including severity classification and mechanism explanations.
- Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
- Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.
## Key Features
See `## Features` above for related details.
- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Check for interactions between multiple medications, including severity classification and mechanism explanations.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.
## Dependencies
See `## Prerequisites` above for related details.
- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `dataclasses`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
- `enum`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
## Example Usage
See `## Usage` above for related details.
```bash
cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/drug-interaction-checker"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```
Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/main.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.
## Implementation Details
See `## Workflow` above for related details.
- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.
## Quick Check
Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.
```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
```
## Audit-Ready Commands
Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.
```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```
## Workflow
1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.
## Features
- **Multi-drug analysis**: Check interactions between 2+ medications simultaneously
- **Severity classification**: Critical / Major / Moderate / Minor / Unknown
- **Mechanism explanation**: Pharmacological basis for each interaction
- **Clinical guidance**: Recommendations for management
## Severity Levels
| Level | Description | Action Required |
|-------|-------------|-----------------|
| **Critical** | Life-threatening interaction | Absolute contraindication |
| **Major** | Significant risk, may need medical intervention | Avoid combination or monitor closely |
| **Moderate** | Moderate risk, may require dose adjustment | Monitor for adverse effects |
| **Minor** | Mild interaction, unlikely to cause issues | Be aware, usually acceptable |
| **Unknown** | Insufficient data | Proceed with caution |
## Usage
### Python Script
```text
python scripts/main.py --drugs "Warfarin" "Aspirin" "Ibuprofen"
```
### As a Module
```python
from scripts.main import check_interactions
result = check_interactions(["Metformin", "Simvastatin", "Amlodipine"])
```
## Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|---------|----------|-------------|
| `--drugs` | list | - | Yes | List of drug names (generic or brand names accepted) |
| `--format` | string | text | No | Output format (text, json, markdown) |
| `--include-mechanism` | flag | true | No | Include pharmacological mechanism |
| `--include-management` | flag | true | No | Include clinical recommendations |
| `--output`, `-o` | string | - | No | Output file path |
## Output Format
```json
{
"drugs_checked": ["Drug A", "Drug B"],
"interactions": [
{
"drug_pair": ["Drug A", "Drug B"],
"severity": "Major",
"mechanism": "Pharmacodynamic synergism...",
"effect": "Increased bleeding risk",
"recommendation": "Avoid combination or monitor INR closely"
}
],
"summary": {
"critical": 0,
"major": 1,
"moderate": 0,
"minor": 0
}
}
```
## Data Sources
This skill uses a curated drug interaction database stored in `references/interactions_db.json`. The database includes:
- FDA-approved drug interaction data
- Known metabolic pathways (CYP450 enzymes)
- Pharmacodynamic interactions
- Common supplement interactions
## Limitations
- Database may not include all possible drug combinations
- Always consult healthcare professionals for medical decisions
- Does not account for patient-specific factors (age, renal function, etc.)
- Not a substitute for professional medical advice
## Technical Difficulty
**High** - Requires extensive pharmacological knowledge database, accurate severity classification, and clear mechanism explanations.
## References
See `references/` directory for:
- `interactions_db.json` - Drug interaction database
- `severity_criteria.md` - Classification criteria
- `cyp450_substrates.json` - Metabolic pathway data
## Risk Assessment
| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|----------------|------------|-------|
| Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium |
| Network Access | No external API calls | Low |
| File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |
## Security Checklist
- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
- [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
- [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
- [ ] Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
- [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
- [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
- [ ] Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
- [ ] Dependencies audited
## Prerequisites
```text
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
## Evaluation Criteria
### Success Metrics
- [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
- [ ] Output meets quality standards
- [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
- [ ] Performance is acceptable
### Test Cases
1. **Basic Functionality**: Standard input → Expected output
2. **Edge Case**: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
3. **Performance**: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time
## Lifecycle Status
- **Current Stage**: Draft
- **Next Review Date**: 2026-03-06
- **Known Issues**: None
- **Planned Improvements**:
- Performance optimization
- Additional feature support
## Output Requirements
Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:
- Objective or requested deliverable
- Inputs used and assumptions introduced
- Workflow or decision path
- Core result, recommendation, or artifact
- Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
- Unresolved items and next-step checks
## Error Handling
- If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
- If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
- If `scripts/main.py` fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
- Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.
## Input Validation
This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of `drug-interaction-checker` and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.
Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:
> `drug-interaction-checker` only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.
## Response Template
Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:
1. Objective
2. Inputs Received
3. Assumptions
4. Workflow
5. Deliverable
6. Risks and Limits
7. Next Checks
If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.Related Skills
faers-multi-drug-soc-planner
Generates complete FAERS-based multi-drug single-SOC safety comparison research designs from a user-provided drug set, comparator, and adverse event domain. Always use this skill when users want to compare safety signals across multiple drugs using FAERS or OpenFDA data within one System Organ Class (SOC) or bounded AE domain. Trigger for:"FAERS study comparing drugs within one SOC", "publishable FAERS safety comparison paper", "compare neuropsychiatric adverse events across beta-blockers", "Lite/Standard/Advanced FAERS safety plans", "active-comparator restricted disproportionality", "adjusted ROR logistic regression FAERS", "within-class head-to-head drug comparison", "pharmacovigilance signal comparison", "single-SOC PT-level FAERS design", or any phrasing like "I want to compare drug X and drug Y for adverse events in FAERS" or "build a comparative pharmacovigilance paper". Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.
symptom-checker-triage
Suggest triage levels (Emergency, Urgent, Outpatient) based on red flag symptoms using a rule-based engine. For AI-assisted decision support only — not a substitute for professional medical diagnosis.
dpi-upscaler-checker
Check if images meet 300 DPI printing standards, and intelligently restore blurry low-resolution images using AI super-resolution technology.
conflict-of-interest-checker
Check for co-authorship and institutional conflicts between authors and suggested reviewers to support peer review integrity. Coauthorship and institutional conflict detection supported.
drugbank-database
Programmatic access to DrugBank drug and target data; use when you need to download, parse, and analyze DrugBank XML for properties, interactions, pathways, and pharmacology.
torchdrug-english
PyTorch-native Graph Neural Network framework for molecules and proteins. Suitable for building custom GNN architectures for drug discovery, protein modeling, or knowledge graph reasoning. Best for custom model development, protein property prediction, and retrosynthesis. If you need pretrained models and diverse feature extractors, use deepchem; if you need benchmark datasets, use pytdc.
figure-reference-checker
Use figure reference checker for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
single-drug-faers-safety-profile
Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for one-drug whole-profile safety mapping using signal detection, subgroup analysis, onset/seriousness characterization, and conservative label-gap interpretation.
single-drug-adverse-effect-pathway-anchored-network-pharmacology
Generates complete reference-grounded single-drug adverse-effect network-pharmacology research designs from a user-provided drug, adverse event, and desired evidence depth. Always use this skill when a user wants to design, plan, or upgrade a conventional network-pharmacology study centered on one fixed drug and one fixed adverse-effect endpoint, using drug-target prediction, adverse-event target collection, overlap analysis, PPI hub prioritization, enrichment interpretation, molecular docking, and optional orthogonal transcriptomic or literature validation. Covers five study patterns (canonical hub-first, cardiotoxicity or electrophysiology-oriented, immune-inflammatory adverse effect, organ-toxicity pathway context, translational validation) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, dependency/evidence map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, verified-reference pack, and self-critical risk review.
single-drug-adverse-effect-hub-first-network-pharmacology
Generates complete reference-grounded single-drug adverse-effect network-pharmacology research designs from a user-provided drug, adverse event, and desired evidence depth. Always use this skill when a user wants to design, plan, or upgrade a conventional network-pharmacology study centered on one fixed drug and one fixed adverse-effect endpoint, using drug-target prediction, adverse-event target collection, overlap analysis, PPI hub prioritization, enrichment interpretation, molecular docking, and optional orthogonal transcriptomic or literature validation. Covers five study patterns (canonical hub-first, cardiotoxicity or electrophysiology-oriented, immune-inflammatory adverse effect, organ-toxicity pathway context, translational validation) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, dependency/evidence map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, verified-reference pack, and self-critical risk review.
drug-repurposing-study-planner
Design evidence-discovery and validation workflows for drug repurposing studies by integrating disease mechanisms, drug-target logic, expression reversal, real-world evidence, and validation routes into a closed-loop study blueprint.
result-reliability-checker
Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.