literature-close-read
Produce a structured close-reading report from a paper's full PDF-to-Markdown text (with `## Page XX` pagination and image references) when you need to systematically extract background, research questions, methods, results, limitations, and reproducible experimental details.
Best use case
literature-close-read is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Produce a structured close-reading report from a paper's full PDF-to-Markdown text (with `## Page XX` pagination and image references) when you need to systematically extract background, research questions, methods, results, limitations, and reproducible experimental details.
Teams using literature-close-read should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/literature-close-read/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How literature-close-read Compares
| Feature / Agent | literature-close-read | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Produce a structured close-reading report from a paper's full PDF-to-Markdown text (with `## Page XX` pagination and image references) when you need to systematically extract background, research questions, methods, results, limitations, and reproducible experimental details.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills) # Literature Close Reading ## When to Use - When you have a full paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a structured, in-depth interpretation rather than a brief abstract-style summary. - When you must extract reproducible experimental details (datasets, settings, controls, metrics, statistics) for replication or reimplementation. - When you need to map the paper's logical chain (motivation → problem → method → experiments → conclusions) and identify missing links or ambiguities. - When you want a systematic list of limitations, threats to validity, and follow-up research questions grounded strictly in the text. - When figures/tables are referenced via Markdown images and you need them incorporated into the interpretation without guessing beyond what is shown. ## Key Features - Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing **Methods** and **Results** for technical fidelity. - Produces a **structured close-reading report** in Markdown (UTF-8), following a predefined template. - Extracts and organizes: - research background and problem statement - methodological details and experimental design - key results and statistical evidence (as explicitly stated) - limitations and threats to validity - reproducible points and follow-up questions - Supports Markdown inputs that include pagination headers like `## Page XX` and image references such as ``. - Enforces a strict constraint: **summarize only what is explicitly present in the text/images; do not infer or speculate**. - Uses external guidance and templates: - Requirements/checklist: `references/guide.md` - Output template: `assets/deep_reading_template.md` ## Dependencies - `pdf-extract` (version: not specified) — used only when the source is PDF and must be converted to Markdown first. ## Example Usage ```bash # 1) (Optional) Convert PDF to Markdown if you only have a PDF # Note: exact command/options depend on your local pdf-extract installation. pdf-extract paper.pdf > paper.md # 2) Run the close-reading process (manual or via your orchestration tool): # Input: paper.md (full text converted from PDF, may include `## Page XX` and images) # Guidance: references/guide.md # Template: assets/deep_reading_template.md # 3) Save the final report as UTF-8 Markdown under outputs/ mkdir -p outputs # Example output file name: # outputs/paper_close_reading.md ``` Minimal expected I/O contract: - **Input**: a single `.md` file containing the full paper text (PDF-to-Markdown), optionally with: - page headers like `## Page 01` - image references like `` - **Output**: one UTF-8 encoded `.md` report saved to `outputs/`, formatted according to `assets/deep_reading_template.md`. - **Language**: default output is Chinese; if the user specifies a language, output in that language. ## Implementation Details - **Input reading rules** - Treat the Markdown as the authoritative source of truth. - Pagination markers (e.g., `## Page XX`) may be used for navigation and citation, but should not alter meaning. - Image references may be used to interpret figures/tables only to the extent that the content is explicitly visible/legible. - **Extraction and summarization rules** - Focus on **Methods** and **Results** first; then connect to background, problem statement, and conclusions. - Capture experimental details precisely: datasets, splits, baselines, ablations, hyperparameters, training/inference settings, evaluation metrics, and statistical tests—only if stated. - If a required field in the template cannot be filled from the text, write **"Not specified"**. - **Quality constraints** - No speculation: do not add assumptions, unstated motivations, or inferred mechanisms. - Maintain traceability: ensure each claim in the report can be traced back to explicit paper content (text or figure/table). - Output must be valid Markdown and saved in **UTF-8** to avoid encoding issues. - **Files used** - Requirements and checklist: `references/guide.md` - Output template: `assets/deep_reading_template.md` - Output directory: `outputs/` (create if missing) ## When Not to Use - Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing. - Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions. - Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow. ## Required Inputs - A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope. - All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution. - Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable. ## Recommended Workflow 1. Validate the request against the skill boundary and confirm all required inputs are present. 2. Select the documented execution path and prefer the simplest supported command or procedure. 3. Produce the expected output using the documented file format, schema, or narrative structure. 4. Run a final validation pass for completeness, consistency, and safety before returning the result. ## Output Contract - Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting. - If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as `literature_close_read_result.md` unless the skill documentation defines a better convention. - Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations. ## Validation and Safety Rules - Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing. - Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material. - Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result. - Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times. ## Failure Handling - If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required. - If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step. - If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed. ## Quick Validation Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible: ```text No local script validation step is required for this skill. ``` Expected output format: ```text Result file: literature_close_read_result.md Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes Assumptions: explicit list if any ```
Related Skills
word-read-write
Create and read Microsoft Word (.docx) documents. Use this skill when you need to generate reports/letters/templates as .docx or extract readable text from existing .docx files.
spreadsheet-ops
Spreadsheet processing and analysis for CSV/Excel; trigger when users ask to merge/clean tabular data, run statistics, add/edit Excel formulas, apply formatting, generate charts, or force workbook recalculation.
literatureimages-interpretation
Interpret figures in academic papers and their captions when the input is a PDF-to-Markdown document with page markers and image links, producing a structured Markdown report for extracting variables, trends, and conclusions.
literature-statistics
Generate statistics for publication-year and journal distributions from local references or PDFs; use when you need standardized Year/Journal tables and a summary without any network access.
literature-management
Import local literature into a managed library; trigger when you need offline deduplication, tagging, and a searchable index.
content-proofreading
An academic proofreading skill for Chinese/English manuscripts, triggered when you need automated checks for spelling, grammar, terminology consistency, and formatting before submission.
literature-filtering
Filter literature by publication year, journal, and predefined screening rules to produce inclusion/exclusion lists; use when conducting preliminary screening or systematic review screening to narrow the literature scope.
literature-extensive-read
Rapidly skim and summarize academic papers (default:PDF-to-Markdown full text with `## Page XX` pagination and image references) and output a structured extensive-reading summary in Markdown when you need to quickly understand research questions, methods, key results, conclusions, and decide whether intensive reading is worthwhile.
literature-experiment-extract
Extract experimental models, experimental methods, and biomarker information from paper Markdown (typically produced by PDF-to-Markdown tools) when a user provides paper Markdown and needs a structured, evidence-backed summary (1 Markdown + 3 CSVs).
multi-database-literature-collector
Collects candidate biomedical literature across multiple databases, adapts search logic by database, preserves source metadata, and organizes results into a structured, screening-ready candidate pool. Always use this skill when a user wants cross-database literature collection, search strategy construction, candidate paper aggregation, or first-pass evidence organization before deduplication, screening, layered reading, or review planning. Requires real and verifiable literature records only. Every formal literature item must include a real link and DOI when available; never fabricate citations, titles, authors, years, journals, abstracts, PMIDs, or DOIs. If a DOI is unavailable or cannot be verified, state that explicitly rather than inventing one.
medical-research-literature-reader-pro
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title. Triggers include requests like "analyze this paper", "critique this study", "is this a strong paper?", "give me similar studies", "prepare me for journal club", "help me understand this bioinformatics paper", "what are the weaknesses here?", or "turn this into a mind map". Also activate for any downstream deliverables such as journal club kits, comparison tables, PI decision briefs, replication starters, or follow-up experiment designs. Do NOT treat as a generic summarizer — this skill performs structured evidence-type classification, track-specific critical appraisal, interpretation-boundary judgment, and research-grade follow-up generation.
figure-first-paper-reader
Reads a paper figure by figure before re-integrating the full narrative, so the user can identify the core findings quickly and check whether each visual actually supports the authors' main claims. Always separate figure content, figure-linked claim, evidentiary strength, and unsupported interpretation. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, figure content, panel labels, result values, or study details that were not actually provided.