meta-screening-fulltext

Screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional PubMed metadata check using PMID. Use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis.

53 stars

Best use case

meta-screening-fulltext is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional PubMed metadata check using PMID. Use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis.

Teams using meta-screening-fulltext should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/meta-screening-fulltext/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills/main/scientific-skills/Data Analysis/meta-screening-fulltext/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/meta-screening-fulltext/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How meta-screening-fulltext Compares

Feature / Agentmeta-screening-fulltextStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional PubMed metadata check using PMID. Use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# Paper Screening (Full Text + PubMed)

This skill screens a medical paper to determine if it should be included in a meta-analysis based on PICO criteria. It can optionally fetch metadata (Title/Abstract) from PubMed if a PMID is provided.

## When to Use

- Use this skill when you need screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional pubmed metadata check using pmid. use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis in a reproducible workflow.
- Use this skill when a data analytics task needs a packaged method instead of ad-hoc freeform output.
- Use this skill when the user expects a concrete deliverable, validation step, or file-based result.
- Use this skill when `scripts/extract_pdf.py` is the most direct path to complete the request.
- Use this skill when you need the `meta-screening-fulltext` package behavior rather than a generic answer.

## Key Features

- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional PubMed metadata check using PMID. Use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/extract_pdf.py`.
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

## Dependencies

- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `Third-party packages`: `not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package`. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

## Example Usage

```bash
cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/meta-screening-fulltext"
python -m py_compile scripts/extract_pdf.py
python scripts/extract_pdf.py --help
```

Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/extract_pdf.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

## Implementation Details

See `## Workflow` above for related details.

- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/extract_pdf.py`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

## Workflow

1.  **Analyze Inputs**:
    *   `input_paper`: Full text of the paper.
    *   `inclu_exclu_criterion`: Inclusion/Exclusion criteria.
    *   `input_pmid` (Optional): PMID of the paper.

2.  **Check PubMed (Optional)**:
    *   If `input_pmid` is provided, run `scripts/query_pubmed.py` to fetch Title and Abstract.
    *   Command: `python scripts/query_pubmed.py "<input_pmid>"`

3.  **Screen Paper**:
    *   **Scenario A: PubMed Hit**: If the script returns metadata, compare the criteria against this data (Title + Abstract).
    *   **Scenario B: No PubMed Data**: Compare the criteria against `input_paper` (full text).
    *   Use the appropriate prompt from `references/screening_prompts.md`.

4.  **Format Output**:
    *   Ensure the output is a JSON object with `Result` ("Include" or "Exclude") and `Reason`.
    *   If "Exclude", the reason must be one of the standard exclusion categories (Wrong population, etc.).

## Quality Rules

*   **Evidence-Based**: Decisions must be based strictly on the provided text or retrieved metadata.
*   **Structured Output**: Final output must always be parseable JSON.
*   **Exclusion Reasons**: Must use standard terminology: "Wrong population", "Wrong intervention", "Wrong comparator", "Wrong outcomes", "Wrong study design".

## Helper Scripts

### PDF Text Extraction

When the user provides a PDF file path, use `extract_pdf.py` to extract the text content before assessment:

Related Skills

meta-protocol-writer

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates a PROSPERO-compliant Meta-analysis protocol based on Title and PICOS. Use when the user wants to write a protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

meta-search-builder

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Medical literature search strategy generator. Given a user's natural-language description (e.g., meta-analysis topic, PICOS elements, research question), automatically extract medical entities (disease, intervention, population, outcomes) and generate professional search queries for seven major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP). Useful for developing search strategies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

fulltext-fetcher

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Fetch and save the original HTML of scientific literature webpages when given a URL, DOI, or PubMed PMID (triggered when you need archival-grade page HTML for downstream parsing or review).

metagenomic-krona-chart

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Analyze data with `metagenomic-krona-chart` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

metabolomics-workbench-database

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Access NIH Metabolomics Workbench (4,200+ studies) via REST API. Query metabolites, RefMet nomenclature, MS/NMR data, m/z search, study metadata for metabolomics and biomarker discovery.

meta-title-generator

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates Meta-Analysis research titles based on user keywords, utilizing PubMed search results if available, or creative generation otherwise. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or generate titles for a meta-analysis, specifically starting from keywords or a topic.

meta-sensitivity-plot

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generate leave-one-out sensitivity analysis plots for meta-analysis. Input is a CSV file containing meta-analysis data; outputs are a sensitivity forest plot (PNG) and a sensitivity data table (CSV) showing pooled effect estimates after excluding each study in turn.

meta-rob2-plot

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Draw ROB2 risk-of-bias plots, including a Traffic Light Plot and a Summary Bar Plot. Input is a CSV file with ROB2 assessments for each study; output are two PNG plot files.

meta-radial-plot

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generate radial plots (Radial Plot/Galbraith Plot) for heterogeneity analysis. Visually assess heterogeneity across studies by displaying the relationship between standardized effect sizes and precision. Input: Meta-analysis data in CSV format; Output: Radial plot PNG and data CSV.

meta-picos-generator

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates PI(E)COS structure (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study Design) from Meta-analysis or study titles. Use when the user wants to extract these elements from a title.

meta-funnel-plot

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generate Meta-analysis funnel plots and perform publication bias testing. Takes CSV file with Meta-analysis data as input, outputs funnel plot PNG, Egger test and Begg test results.

meta-forest-model-plot

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generate forest plots for meta-analysis of survival data. Input is a CSV file containing study names, HR and 95% confidence intervals, output forest plot PNG and data table CSV. Supports both R and Python scripts.