paper-sprint-review

Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.

53 stars

Best use case

paper-sprint-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.

Teams using paper-sprint-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/paper-sprint-review/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills/main/awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/paper-sprint-review/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/paper-sprint-review/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How paper-sprint-review Compares

Feature / Agentpaper-sprint-reviewStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

# PaperSprint v2.2

**Scrum-inspired paper agent for review, revision, and R&R.**

---

## When to Use

- Review an academic paper and identify issues
- Revise a manuscript based on reviewer comments
- Respond to reviewers (R&R)
- Estimate revision workload
- Plan paper revision sprints
- Export review reports (MD/PDF/DOCX/HTML/LaTeX)

---

## Core Principles

| # | Principle | Description |
|---|-----------|-------------|
| 1 | Progressive inquiry | Only ask for missing information, never repeat known facts |
| 2 | Range estimates | Always give ranges, never false precision |
| 3 | Actionable critique | Every critique must point to a specific location |
| 4 | Human finalization | Never auto-submit — human verification always required |
| 5 | Explicit focus shifts | Always announce when switching focus |

---

## Workflow

```
INTAKE → PLANNING → REVIEW → AMENDMENT
                          ↓
                       BACKLOG
                          ↓
                SPRINT REVIEW & RETRO
                          ↓
                   NEXT SPRINT / GATE
```

→ Full details: [references/quick_reference.md](references/quick_reference.md)

---

## Input Validation

This skill accepts: Paper review, revision, and R&R workflows in Chinese or English.

If the user's request does not involve paper review, revision, or reviewer response — for example, asking to write a paper from scratch, generate research ideas, or perform data analysis — do not proceed with the workflow. Instead respond:
> "PaperSprint is designed for paper review, revision, and R&R workflows. Your request appears to be outside this scope. For paper writing, please use manuscript drafting tools. For research ideas, please use idea generation tools. For data analysis, please use analysis tools."

**Disclaimer (Required):** All review suggestions are for reference only. Consult domain experts before making final decisions.

---

## Progressive Disclosure — Reference Files

Load each reference file only when its trigger condition is met.

### Intake

**File**: [references/intake.md](references/intake.md)

**When to load**:
- Running `/ps intake`
- User provides a manuscript file for the first time
- Need to determine manuscript stage
- User has not specified target journal/conference
- Need to generate an Intake Summary

**Contents**:
- Progressive inquiry rules (never repeat known information)
- Minimum required fields checklist
- Auto stage detection criteria
- Intake output template

---

### Stage Detection

**File**: [detection/stage_detector.md](detection/stage_detector.md)

**When to load**:
- Need to determine which stage the manuscript is in
- Manuscript structure appears incomplete
- User has not specified a stage and auto-detection is needed
- Need to explain the basis for a stage determination

**Contents**:
- Stage detection indicators
- Detection algorithm flow
- Confidence threshold settings
- User override mechanism

---

### Review

**File**: [references/review.md](references/review.md)

**When to load**:
- Running `/ps review`
- Need to conduct multi-lens review
- Unsure how to write review comments
- Need review output templates
- User requests a specific review lens

**Contents**:
- Reading priority strategy (not reading the full paper at once)
- Review dimension weight table
- Four-lens configuration (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor)
- Journal-specific lens adjustments
- Actionable critique rules

---

### Backlog

**File**: [references/backlog.md](references/backlog.md)

**When to load**:
- Running `/ps backlog`
- Need to create or manage backlog items
- Need to prioritize items
- Dependencies exist between items
- Need to close a backlog item

**Contents**:
- Backlog item structure (id/title/severity/bucket/status, etc.)
- Bucket classification rules
- Priority ranking algorithm
- Dependency management
- Backlog command reference

---

### Quality Gates

**File**: [references/gates.md](references/gates.md)

**When to load**:
- Running `/ps gate check`
- Need to determine whether the paper can advance to the next stage
- Critical issues detected requiring a gate check
- Preparing for submission and need a final check
- Need to explain why a gate failed

**Contents**:
- Contribution Gate checks (early stage)
- Rigor Gate checks (mid stage)
- Writing Gate checks (late stage)
- Submission Gate checks (final stage, human-only)
- Gate evaluation output template

---

### Sprint Estimation

→ Full details: [references/sprint_estimation.md](references/sprint_estimation.md)

---

### Export

**File**: [references/export.md](references/export.md)

**When to load**:
- Running `/ps export`
- Need to export a report in a specific format
- Export encounters an error
- Need to understand format requirements

**Contents**:
- Supported export formats
- Dependencies for each format
- Export command reference
- Error handling

---

### Quality Checker

**File**: [detection/quality_checker.md](detection/quality_checker.md)

**When to load**:
- Need to check paper quality
- Gate check identifies issues requiring deeper analysis
- User requests a quality assessment
- Need to generate a quality report

**Contents**:
- Quality check dimensions
- Common issue detection rules
- Quality scoring criteria

---

## Templates — Load on Demand

| Template | When to load |
|----------|-------------|
| [templates/sprint_brief.md](templates/sprint_brief.md) | Generating a sprint brief |
| [templates/process_log.md](templates/process_log.md) | Recording a process log |
| [templates/backlog_item.md](templates/backlog_item.md) | Creating a backlog item |
| [templates/review_memo.md](templates/review_memo.md) | Writing a review memo |
| [templates/amendment_summary.md](templates/amendment_summary.md) | Generating an amendment summary |
| [templates/sprint_review.md](templates/sprint_review.md) | Conducting a sprint review |
| [templates/retrospective.md](templates/retrospective.md) | Conducting a sprint retrospective |
| [templates/human_finalization.md](templates/human_finalization.md) | Generating human finalization checklist |
| [templates/export_report.md](templates/export_report.md) | Exporting a full report |

---

## Language Support

- Chinese: Use Chinese templates, keep journal names as-is
- English: Use English templates, standard terminology

---

## Terminology Glossary

| English | 中文 |
|---------|------|
| Backlog | 待办事项 |
| Sprint | 冲刺 |
| Intake | 接收 |
| Amendment | 修订 |
| Gate | 门禁 |
| Review Lens | 评审视角 |
| Contribution | 贡献 |
| Rigor | 严谨性 |
| Camera-ready | 定稿 |

---

## Critical Decision Flowchart

→ Full details: [references/decision_flowchart.md](references/decision_flowchart.md)

---

## Escape Hatches

Explicitly decline or redirect in these situations:

1. **Out-of-scope requests**: Writing a new paper, generating research ideas → use other tools
2. **Adversarial inputs**: Asked to fabricate conclusions or prove a paper is wrong → remain objective, provide balanced review
3. **Beyond capability**: Non-academic file formats, highly specialized domain knowledge → clearly state limitations

**Disclaimer**: This tool provides review suggestions only. Consult domain experts before making final decisions.

---

*PaperSprint v2.2*

Related Skills

sci-paper-reviewer

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Simulates a strict SCI peer-review workflow; trigger when a user uploads or pastes a manuscript (PDF/DOC/DOCX/TXT) and requests an innovation score (1–12) plus experimental-logic vulnerability checks and revision suggestions.

paper-tweet-generator

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates a structured reading tweet from an academic paper (PDF, Word, or Text), highlighting specific product advantages. Use when the user wants to turn a document into a social media post or reading summary.

academic-norm-review

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Detects content similarity, verifies standardized citations and abbreviations, and flags potential academic integrity risks; use it before submission, during academic writing QA, or for compliance reviews.

systematic-review-screener

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support.

research-paper-downloader

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Download academic papers from open-access sources when the user provides a DOI/arXiv ID or requests a keyword-based paper search, and return the saved PDF path.

peer-review

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Conduct professional peer reviews for papers or theses, providing structured evaluations and improvement suggestions; use when you need a pre-submission assessment, an internal review, or academic quality control.

peer-review-response-drafter

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Assist in drafting professional peer review response letters. Trigger.

paper-2-web

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Use this skill when converting academic papers to promotional and presentation formats, including interactive websites (Paper2Web), presentation videos (Paper2Video), and conference posters (Paper2Poster). This skill is suitable for paper dissemination, conference preparation, creating explorable academic homepages, generating video abstracts, or producing printable posters from LaTeX or PDF source.

molecular-review-workflow

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates academic reviews for molecules in diseases using PubMed research. Invoke when user needs biomedical literature review with Vancouver citation format.

grant-mock-reviewer

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Simulates NIH study section peer review for grant proposals. Triggers.

blind-review-sanitizer

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Use blind-review-sanitizer for academic writing workflows that need structured anonymization, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries for double-blind submission.

paper-to-claim-verifier

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.