clojure-review
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
Best use case
clojure-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "clojure-review" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/clojure-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How clojure-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | clojure-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
SKILL.md Source
# Clojure Code Review Skill
# Metabase Clojure Style Guide
This guide covers Clojure and ClojureScript coding conventions for Metabase. See also: `CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc` for the Community Clojure Style Guide.
## Naming Conventions
**General Naming:**
- Acceptable abbreviations: `acc`, `i`, `pred`, `coll`, `n`, `s`, `k`, `f`
- Use `kebab-case` for all variables, functions, and constants
**Function Naming:**
- Pure functions should be nouns describing the value they return (e.g., `age` not `calculate-age` or `get-age`)
- Functions with side effects must end with `!`
- Don't repeat namespace alias in function names
**Destructuring:**
- Map destructuring should use kebab-case local bindings even if the map uses `snake_case` keys
## Documentation Standards
**Docstrings:**
- Every public var in `src` or `enterprise/backend/src` must have docstring
- Format using Markdown conventions
- Reference other vars with `[[other-var]]` not backticks
**Comments:**
- `TODO` format: `;; TODO (Name M/D/YY) -- description`
## Code Organization
**Visibility:**
- Make everything `^:private` unless it is used elsewhere
- Try to organize namespaces to avoid `declare` (put public functions near the end)
**Size and Structure:**
- Break up functions > 20 lines
- Lines ≤ 120 characters
- No blank lines within definition forms (except pairwise `let`/`cond`)
## Style Conventions
**Keywords and Metadata:**
- Prefer namespaced keywords for internal use: `:query-type/normal` not `:normal`
- Tag variables with `:arglists` metadata if they're functions but wouldn't otherwise have it
## Tests
**Organization:**
- Break large tests into separate `deftest` forms for logically separate test cases
- Test names should end in `-test` or `-test-<number>`
**Performance:**
- Mark pure function tests `^:parallel`
## Modules
**OSS Modules:**
- Follow `metabase.<module>.*` pattern
- Source in `src/metabase/<module>/`
**Enterprise Modules:**
- Follow `metabase-enterprise.<module>.*` pattern
- Source in `enterprise/backend/src/metabase_enterprise/<module>/`
**Module Structure:**
- REST API endpoints go in `<module>.api` or `<module>.api.*` namespaces
- Put module public API in `<module>.core` using Potemkin imports
- Put Toucan models in `<module>.models.*`
- Put settings in `<module>.settings`
- Put schemas in `<module>.schema`
**Module Linters:**
- Do not cheat module linters with `:clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]`
## REST API Endpoints
**Required Elements:**
- All new endpoints must have response schemas (`:- <schema>` after route string)
- All endpoints need Malli schemas for parameters (detailed and complete)
- All new REST API endpoints MUST HAVE TESTS
**Naming Conventions:**
- Query parameters use kebab-case
- Request bodies use `snake_case`
- Routes use singular nouns (e.g., `/api/dashboard/:id`)
**Behavior:**
- `GET` endpoints should not have side effects (except analytics)
- `defendpoint` forms should be small wrappers around Toucan model code
## MBQL (Metabase Query Language)
**Restrictions:**
- No raw MBQL introspection outside of `lib`, `lib-be`, or `query-processor` modules
- Use Lib and MBQL 5 in new source code; avoid legacy MBQL
## Database and Models
**Naming:**
- Model names and table names should be singular nouns
- Application database uses `snake_case` identifiers
**Best Practices:**
- Use `t2/select-one-fn` instead of fetching entire rows for one column
- Put correct behavior in Toucan methods, not separate helper functions
## Drivers
**Documentation:**
- New driver multimethods must be mentioned in `docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md`
**Implementation:**
- Driver implementations should pass `driver` argument to other driver multimethods
- Don't hardcode driver names in implementations
- Minimize logic inside `read-column-thunk` in JDBC-based drivers
## Miscellaneous
**Examples:**
- Example data should be bird-themed if possible
**Linter Suppressions:**
- Use proper format for kondo suppressions
- No `#_:clj-kondo/ignore` (keyword form)
**Configurable Options:**
- Don't define configurable options that can only be set with environment variables
- Use `:internal` `defsetting` instead
## Linting and Formatting
- **Lint PR:** `./bin/mage kondo-updated master` (or whatever target branch)
- Call the command one time at the beginning, record the results, then work through the problems one at a time.
- If the solution is obvious, then please apply the fix. Otherwise skip it.
- If you fix all the issues (and verify by rerunning the kondo-updated command):
- commit the change with a succinct and descriptive commit message
- **Lint File:** `./bin/mage kondo <file or files>`
- Use the linter as a way to know that you are adhering to conventions in place in the codebase
- **Lint Changes:** `./bin/mage kondo-updated HEAD`
- **Format:** `./bin/mage cljfmt-files [path]`
## Testing
- **Run a test:** `./bin/mage run-tests namespace/test-name`
- **Run all tests in a namespace:** `./bin/mage run-tests namespace`
- **Run all tests for a module:** `./bin/mage run-tests test/metabase/notification` Because the module lives in that directory.
Note: the `./bin/mage run-tests` command accepts multiple args, so you can pass
`./bin/mage run-tests namespace/test-name namespace/other-test namespace/third-test`
to run 3 tests, or
`./bin/mage run-tests test/metabase/module1 test/metabase/module2` to run 2 modules.
## Code Readability
- **Check Code Readability:** `./bin/mage -check-readable <file> [line-number]`
- Run after every change to Clojure code
- Check specific line first, then entire file if readable
## REPL Usage
> **Note:** If you have `clojure-mcp` tools available (check for tools like `clojure_eval`),
> **always prefer those over `./bin/mage -repl`**. The MCP tools provide better integration,
> richer feedback, and avoid shell escaping issues. Only use `./bin/mage -repl` as a fallback
> when clojure-mcp is not available.
- **Evaluating Clojure Code:** `./bin/mage -repl '<code>'`
- See "Sending Code to the REPL" section for more details
### Sending Code to the REPL
- Send code to the metabase process REPL using: `./bin/mage -repl '(+ 1 1)'` where `(+ 1 1)` is your Clojure code.
- See `./bin/mage -repl -h` for more details.
- If the Metabase backend is not running, you'll see an error message with instructions on how to start it.
#### Working with Files and Namespaces
1. **Load a file and call functions with fully qualified names**:
To call `your.namespace/your-function` on `arg1` and `arg2`:
```
./bin/mage -repl --namespace your.namespace '(your-function arg1 arg2)'
```
DO NOT use "require", "load-file" etc in the code string argument.
#### Understanding the Response
The `./bin/mage -repl` command returns three separate, independent outputs:
- `value`: The return value of the last expression (best for data structures)
- `stdout`: Any printed output from `println` etc. (best for messages)
- `stderr`: Any error messages (best for warnings and errors)
Example call:
```bash
./bin/mage -repl '(println "Hello, world!") '\''({0 1, 1 3, 2 0, 3 2} {0 2, 1 0, 2 3, 3 1})'
```
Example response:
```
ns: user
session: 32a35206-871c-4553-9bc9-f49491173d1c
value: ({0 1, 1 3, 2 0, 3 2} {0 2, 1 0, 2 3, 3 1})
stdout: Hello, world!
stderr:
```
For effective REPL usage:
- Return data structures as function return values
- Use `println` for human-readable messages
- Print errors to stderr
## Review guidelines
**What to flag:**
- Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above)
- If `CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc` exists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide
- Flag all style guide violations
**What NOT to post:**
- Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines
- Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly
- Only post comments about style violations or potential issues
Example bad code review comments to avoid:
> This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work!
> Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.
> The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here
> Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide.
**Special cases:**
- Do not post comments about missing parentheses (these will be caught by the linter)
## Quick review checklist
Use this to scan through changes efficiently:
### Naming
- [ ] Descriptive names (no `tbl`, `zs'`)
- [ ] Pure functions named as nouns describing their return value
- [ ] `kebab-case` for all variables and functions
- [ ] Side-effect functions end with `!`
- [ ] No namespace-alias repetition in function names
### Documentation
- [ ] Public vars in `src` or `enterprise/backend/src` have useful docstrings
- [ ] Docstrings use Markdown conventions
- [ ] References use `[[other-var]]` not backticks
- [ ] `TODO` comments include author and date: `;; TODO (Name 1/1/25) -- description`
### Code Organization
- [ ] Everything `^:private` unless used elsewhere
- [ ] No `declare` when avoidable (public functions near end)
- [ ] Functions under 20 lines when possible
- [ ] No blank lines within definition forms (except pairwise constructs in `let`/`cond`)
- [ ] Lines ≤ 120 characters
### Tests
- [ ] Separate `deftest` forms for distinct test cases
- [ ] Pure tests marked `^:parallel`
- [ ] Test names end in `-test` or `-test-<number>`
### Modules
- [ ] Correct module patterns (OSS: `metabase.<module>.*`, EE: `metabase-enterprise.<module>.*`)
- [ ] API endpoints in `<module>.api` namespaces
- [ ] Public API in `<module>.core` with Potemkin
- [ ] No cheating module linters with `:clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]`
### REST API
- [ ] Response schemas present (`:- <schema>`)
- [ ] Query params use kebab-case, bodies use `snake_case`
- [ ] Routes use singular nouns (e.g., `/api/dashboard/:id`)
- [ ] `GET` has no side effects (except analytics)
- [ ] Malli schemas detailed and complete
- [ ] All new endpoints have tests
### MBQL
- [ ] No raw MBQL manipulation outside `lib`, `lib-be`, or `query-processor` modules
- [ ] Uses Lib and MBQL 5, not legacy MBQL
### Database
- [ ] Model and table names are singular nouns
- [ ] Uses `t2/select-one-fn` instead of selecting full rows for one column
- [ ] Logic in Toucan methods, not helper functions
### Drivers
- [ ] New multimethods documented in `docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md`
- [ ] Passes `driver` argument to other driver methods (no hardcoded driver names)
- [ ] Minimal logic in `read-column-thunk`
### Miscellaneous
- [ ] Example data is bird-themed when possible
- [ ] Kondo linter suppressions use proper format (not `#_:clj-kondo/ignore` keyword form)
## Pattern matching table
Quick scan for common issues:
| Pattern | Issue |
| -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| `calculate-age`, `get-user` | Pure functions should be nouns: `age`, `user` |
| `update-db`, `save-model` | Missing `!` for side effects: `update-db!`, `save-model!` |
| `snake_case_var` | Should use kebab-case |
| Public var without docstring | Add docstring explaining purpose |
| `;; TODO fix this` | Missing author/date: `;; TODO (Name 1/1/25) -- description` |
| `(defn foo ...)` in namespace used elsewhere | Should be `(defn ^:private foo ...)` |
| Function > 20 lines | Consider breaking up into smaller functions |
| `/api/dashboards/:id` | Use singular: `/api/dashboard/:id` |
| Query params with `snake_case` | Use kebab-case for query params |
| New API endpoint without tests | Add tests for the endpoint |
## Feedback format examples
**For style violations:**
> This pure function should be named as a noun describing its return value. Consider `user` instead of `get-user`.
**For missing documentation:**
> This public var needs a docstring explaining its purpose, inputs, and outputs.
**For organization issues:**
> This function is only used in this namespace, so it should be marked `^:private`.
**For API conventions:**
> Query parameters should use kebab-case. Change `user_id` to `user-id`.Related Skills
woocommerce-code-review
Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality.
security-review
Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.
performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review
Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review
performance-testing-review-ai-review
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C
fix-review
Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs
error-debugging-multi-agent-review
Use when working with error debugging multi agent review
comprehensive-review-pr-enhance
You are a PR optimization expert specializing in creating high-quality pull requests that facilitate efficient code reviews. Generate comprehensive PR descriptions, automate review processes, and ensure PRs follow best practices for clarity, size, and reviewability.
comprehensive-review-full-review
Use when working with comprehensive review full review
codex-review
Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
code-review-checklist
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability
code-review-ai-ai-review
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C