flow-finishing-branch
Decide how to complete a development branch: merge, PR, squash, or cleanup.
Best use case
flow-finishing-branch is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. Decide how to complete a development branch: merge, PR, squash, or cleanup.
Decide how to complete a development branch: merge, PR, squash, or cleanup.
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "flow-finishing-branch" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: Decide how to complete a development branch: merge, PR, squash, or cleanup.
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/flow-finishing-branch/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How flow-finishing-branch Compares
| Feature / Agent | flow-finishing-branch | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Decide how to complete a development branch: merge, PR, squash, or cleanup.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Flow Finishing Branch - 分支完成决策 ## Overview When development work is complete, you need to decide how to integrate it. This skill guides that decision. ## Decision Options ### A) Fast-forward Merge ```yaml When to use: - Small changes (< 5 files) - Single developer - No review needed - Clean commit history Command: git checkout main git merge --ff-only feature/xxx git branch -d feature/xxx Pros: - Fast - Clean history - No merge commit Cons: - No review record - No CI verification ``` ### B) Create PR (Recommended) ```yaml When to use: - Team projects - Need review record - CI verification required - Production code Command: git push -u origin feature/xxx gh pr create --title "..." --body "..." Pros: - Review record - CI verification - Discussion thread - Audit trail Cons: - Takes longer - Requires reviewer ``` ### C) Squash and Merge ```yaml When to use: - Many small commits - Messy commit history - Want single commit in main Command: gh pr merge --squash Pros: - Clean main history - Single logical commit - Hides WIP commits Cons: - Loses detailed history - Harder to bisect ``` ### D) Cleanup Only ```yaml When to use: - Work was abandoned - Experiment failed - Requirements changed Command: git checkout main git branch -D feature/xxx git push origin --delete feature/xxx # if pushed Pros: - Clean slate - No dead branches Cons: - Work is lost (unless needed later) ``` ## Decision Matrix ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Decision Matrix │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ Files Changed Review Needed History Clean Action │ │ ───────────── ───────────── ───────────── ────── │ │ < 5 No Yes A) FF │ │ < 5 No No C) Sq │ │ Any Yes Yes B) PR │ │ Any Yes No C) Sq │ │ N/A N/A N/A (abandoned) D) Del │ │ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` ## Pre-Completion Checklist Before choosing any option, verify: ```yaml □ All tests pass □ Build succeeds □ No lint errors □ Documentation updated (if needed) □ EXECUTION_LOG.md updated □ No uncommitted changes ``` ## The Process ```yaml 1. Verify completion → Run tests, build, lint → Check all tasks done 2. Assess the work → How many files changed? → Is review needed? → Is commit history clean? 3. Choose option → Use decision matrix → Default to PR if unsure 4. Execute → Run appropriate commands → Verify success 5. Cleanup → Delete local branch → Delete remote branch (if not PR) ``` ## Rationalization Prevention | Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "PR is overkill" | PR provides audit trail. Use it. | | "I'll review my own code" | Self-review misses issues. Get another pair of eyes. | | "History doesn't matter" | History helps debugging. Keep it clean. | | "Just merge it" | Verify first. Merge second. | ## Integration with flow-release This skill is used in `/flow-release` to decide branch handling: ```yaml /flow-release execution: 1. Verify all gates pass 2. Load this skill 3. Present options to user 4. Execute chosen option 5. Update status ``` ## Cross-Reference - [flow-release.md](../../commands/flow-release.md) - Release command - [verification-before-completion](../verification-before-completion/SKILL.md) - Verification skill --- **[PROTOCOL]**: 变更时更新此头部,然后检查 CLAUDE.md
Related Skills
req-change-workflow
Standardize requirement/feature changes in an existing codebase (especially Chrome extensions) by turning "改需求/需求变更/调整交互/改功能/重构流程" into a repeatable loop: clarify acceptance criteria, confirm current behavior from code, assess impact/risk, design the new logic, implement with small diffs, run a fixed regression checklist, and update docs/decision log. Use when the user feels the change process is chaotic, when edits tend to sprawl across files, or when changes touch manifest/service worker/OAuth/storage/UI and need reliable verification + rollback planning.
defou-workflow
将原始想法转化为结构清晰、判断明确、具有长期价值的“得否”风格内容报告。
defou-stanley-workflow
Defou x Stanley 融合工作流:结合深度结构化思考与人性弱点洞察,生成极简、犀利且具有长期价值的爆款内容。
agentic-workflow
Practical AI agent workflows and productivity techniques. Provides optimized patterns for daily development tasks such as commands, shortcuts, Git integration, MCP usage, and session management.
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
workflow-orchestration-patterns
Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems. Covers workflow vs activity separation, saga patterns, state management, and determinism constraints. Use when building long-running processes, distributed transactions, or microservice orchestration.
workflow-automation
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
webflow-automation
Automate Webflow CMS collections, site publishing, page management, asset uploads, and ecommerce orders via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor
Use when working with tdd workflows tdd refactor
tdd-workflows-tdd-red
Generate failing tests for the TDD red phase to define expected behavior and edge cases.
tdd-workflows-tdd-green
Implement the minimal code needed to make failing tests pass in the TDD green phase.
tdd-workflows-tdd-cycle
Use when working with tdd workflows tdd cycle