multiAI Summary Pending
pr-description
Guide for creating comprehensive PR descriptions with proper structure, diagrams, and documentation for code reviews.
231 stars
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/pr-description/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aiskillstore/marketplace/main/skills/bfdcampos/pr-description/SKILL.md"
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/pr-description/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent โ it will auto-discover the skill
How pr-description Compares
| Feature / Agent | pr-description | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | multi | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Guide for creating comprehensive PR descriptions with proper structure, diagrams, and documentation for code reviews.
Which AI agents support this skill?
This skill is compatible with multi.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# PR Description Skill This skill provides a structured approach to creating comprehensive pull request descriptions that help reviewers understand changes quickly. ## When to Use Use this skill when: - Creating a new pull request - User asks to "create a PR description" or "write a PR description" - Documenting significant code changes for review ## File Creation (Optional) If saving the PR description to a file: - **Pattern**: `pr_description_<descriptive_title>_<timestamp>.md` - **Get timestamp**: `date +"%Y%m%d_%H%M%S"` - **Example**: `pr_description_user_auth_refactor_20250612_152832.md` ## Required Structure ```markdown # PR Title: [Descriptive Title] ## ๐ Summary Brief overview of what this PR accomplishes in 2-3 sentences. ## ๐ Data Flow Diagram [Mermaid diagram showing the flow/architecture - use `mermaid` skill for styling] ## ๐๏ธ Entity Relationship Diagram [Include if creating/modifying data relationships - Mermaid ERD] ## ๐ฏ Goals - Primary objective 1 - Primary objective 2 - Any secondary objectives ## ๐ Changes in this PR - Description of key changes - Any config file changes - Schema modifications - Breaking changes (if any) ## ๐งช Testing ### Commands Run ```bash # List exact commands used for testing npm test npm run lint ``` ### Results - โ All tests passed - โ Linting passed - โ Build successful - Include any relevant screenshots or output ### Validation - Key scenarios tested - Edge cases covered - Performance considerations ## ๐ Notes for Reviewers - Pay attention to: [specific areas] - Assumptions made: [list any assumptions] - Dependencies: [any upstream/downstream impacts] ## ๐ Future Work - Any follow-up tasks not included in this PR - Potential optimisations - Additional testing needed ``` ## Mermaid Diagrams **Use the `mermaid` skill** for diagram syntax and styling that works in both light and dark mode. ### Data Flow Diagram Show the complete flow of data or logic: - Input sources - Processing steps - Output destinations - Include a colour-coded legend ### Entity Relationship Diagram (When Applicable) Show object/data relationships: - Primary keys (PK) - Foreign keys (FK) - Relationship cardinality (one-to-many, many-to-many) ## Content Guidelines ### Summary Section - Explain business context briefly - Highlight key benefits - Keep it to 2-3 sentences ### Changes Section - Focus on what matters to reviewers - Group related changes together - Note any breaking changes prominently ### Testing Section - **ALWAYS include exact commands run** - Show evidence of successful tests - Include validation results - Add screenshots when helpful ### Future Work Section - List intentionally deferred items - Suggest optimisations or enhancements - Note any technical debt created ## Key Principles 1. **Be specific**: Include exact commands, concrete examples 2. **Show evidence**: Screenshots, command outputs, test results 3. **Think reviewer-first**: What would a reviewer need to understand the changes? 4. **Business context**: Explain the "why" not just the "what" 5. **Keep it scannable**: Use headers, bullet points, and formatting ## Good Examples ### Good Summary "This PR refactors the user authentication flow to use JWT tokens instead of session cookies. The change improves scalability for our microservices architecture and reduces server-side session storage requirements." ### Good Testing Description ```bash # Commands run npm run test:unit npm run test:integration npm run lint ``` **Results:** - โ 47 unit tests passed - โ 12 integration tests passed - โ No linting errors - โ Manual testing completed on staging environment ## Error Handling - If unable to determine scope of changes, ask user for clarification - If testing hasn't been completed, remind user to run tests first - If no diagrams provided, create placeholder diagrams and ask user to review