solid-principles
SOLID object-oriented design principles for maintainable code
Best use case
solid-principles is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. SOLID object-oriented design principles for maintainable code
SOLID object-oriented design principles for maintainable code
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "solid-principles" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: SOLID object-oriented design principles for maintainable code
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/solid-principles/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How solid-principles Compares
| Feature / Agent | solid-principles | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
SOLID object-oriented design principles for maintainable code
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# SOLID Principles
Five principles for object-oriented design that lead to maintainable, extensible software.
## S - Single Responsibility Principle
> A class should have only one reason to change.
```typescript
// BAD - multiple responsibilities
class UserService {
createUser(data: UserData) { /* ... */ }
sendEmail(user: User, message: string) { /* ... */ }
generateReport(users: User[]) { /* ... */ }
validateEmail(email: string) { /* ... */ }
}
// GOOD - single responsibility each
class UserService {
constructor(
private repository: UserRepository,
private validator: UserValidator
) {}
createUser(data: UserData): User {
this.validator.validate(data);
return this.repository.save(data);
}
}
class EmailService {
send(to: string, message: string) { /* ... */ }
}
class UserReportGenerator {
generate(users: User[]): Report { /* ... */ }
}
class EmailValidator {
validate(email: string): boolean { /* ... */ }
}
```
**When to apply:** If you describe a class with "and" (UserService creates users AND sends emails AND...), split it.
## O - Open/Closed Principle
> Open for extension, closed for modification.
```typescript
// BAD - must modify class to add new types
class PaymentProcessor {
process(payment: Payment) {
if (payment.type === 'credit') {
// process credit card
} else if (payment.type === 'paypal') {
// process PayPal
} else if (payment.type === 'crypto') {
// process crypto - had to modify!
}
}
}
// GOOD - extend without modification
interface PaymentMethod {
process(amount: number): Promise<Receipt>;
}
class CreditCardPayment implements PaymentMethod {
async process(amount: number): Promise<Receipt> {
// credit card logic
}
}
class PayPalPayment implements PaymentMethod {
async process(amount: number): Promise<Receipt> {
// PayPal logic
}
}
// Adding crypto doesn't modify existing code
class CryptoPayment implements PaymentMethod {
async process(amount: number): Promise<Receipt> {
// crypto logic
}
}
class PaymentProcessor {
process(method: PaymentMethod, amount: number) {
return method.process(amount);
}
}
```
**When to apply:** When adding new features requires modifying existing, tested code.
## L - Liskov Substitution Principle
> Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.
```typescript
// BAD - Square violates Rectangle contract
class Rectangle {
constructor(protected width: number, protected height: number) {}
setWidth(width: number) { this.width = width; }
setHeight(height: number) { this.height = height; }
getArea() { return this.width * this.height; }
}
class Square extends Rectangle {
setWidth(width: number) {
this.width = width;
this.height = width; // Violates expectation!
}
setHeight(height: number) {
this.width = height;
this.height = height; // Violates expectation!
}
}
// This breaks:
function doubleWidth(rect: Rectangle) {
const originalHeight = rect.getArea() / rect.width;
rect.setWidth(rect.width * 2);
// For Square, height also doubled - unexpected!
}
// GOOD - separate hierarchies
interface Shape {
getArea(): number;
}
class Rectangle implements Shape {
constructor(private width: number, private height: number) {}
getArea() { return this.width * this.height; }
}
class Square implements Shape {
constructor(private side: number) {}
getArea() { return this.side * this.side; }
}
```
**When to apply:** If subclass overrides change behavior that callers depend on.
## I - Interface Segregation Principle
> Clients should not depend on interfaces they don't use.
```typescript
// BAD - fat interface
interface Worker {
work(): void;
eat(): void;
sleep(): void;
attendMeeting(): void;
writeReport(): void;
}
class Robot implements Worker {
work() { /* ... */ }
eat() { throw new Error('Robots do not eat'); } // Forced to implement!
sleep() { throw new Error('Robots do not sleep'); }
attendMeeting() { throw new Error('Not applicable'); }
writeReport() { throw new Error('Not applicable'); }
}
// GOOD - segregated interfaces
interface Workable {
work(): void;
}
interface Feedable {
eat(): void;
}
interface Sleepable {
sleep(): void;
}
interface MeetingAttendee {
attendMeeting(): void;
}
class Human implements Workable, Feedable, Sleepable, MeetingAttendee {
work() { /* ... */ }
eat() { /* ... */ }
sleep() { /* ... */ }
attendMeeting() { /* ... */ }
}
class Robot implements Workable {
work() { /* ... */ }
}
```
**When to apply:** When classes implement methods they don't need, or throw "not implemented" errors.
## D - Dependency Inversion Principle
> Depend on abstractions, not concretions.
```typescript
// BAD - high-level depends on low-level
class MySQLDatabase {
query(sql: string) { /* ... */ }
}
class UserRepository {
private db = new MySQLDatabase(); // Tight coupling!
findById(id: string) {
return this.db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = '${id}'`);
}
}
// GOOD - both depend on abstraction
interface Database {
query<T>(sql: string): Promise<T>;
}
class MySQLDatabase implements Database {
async query<T>(sql: string): Promise<T> { /* ... */ }
}
class PostgreSQLDatabase implements Database {
async query<T>(sql: string): Promise<T> { /* ... */ }
}
class UserRepository {
constructor(private db: Database) {} // Injected!
findById(id: string) {
return this.db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = '${id}'`);
}
}
// Easy to swap implementations
const repo = new UserRepository(new PostgreSQLDatabase());
```
**When to apply:** When testing is hard, or changing one module breaks others.
## SOLID in Practice
### Recognizing Violations
| Principle | Code Smell |
|-----------|------------|
| SRP | Class has many unrelated methods |
| OCP | Adding feature requires modifying existing code |
| LSP | Subclass throws "not supported" or behaves differently |
| ISP | Class implements methods it doesn't use |
| DIP | `new` keyword scattered throughout business logic |
### Applying SOLID
1. **Start simple** - Don't over-engineer from day one
2. **Refactor when needed** - Apply when you feel the pain
3. **Use dependency injection** - Makes DIP natural
4. **Prefer composition** - Over inheritance (helps LSP)
5. **Write small interfaces** - Easier than splitting later
### Balance
SOLID is a guide, not law. Over-applying creates:
- Too many tiny classes
- Indirection that's hard to follow
- Abstractions nobody needs yet
Apply SOLID when:
- Code is hard to test
- Changes ripple through the codebase
- Similar changes needed in multiple places
- You're adding the 3rd variation of something
## Checklist
- [ ] Does each class have a single, clear purpose?
- [ ] Can I add features without modifying existing code?
- [ ] Can subclasses replace parent classes safely?
- [ ] Are interfaces focused and minimal?
- [ ] Are dependencies injected, not created internally?Related Skills
solidity-security
Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common vulnerabilities and implement secure Solidity patterns. Use when writing smart contracts, auditing existing contracts, or implementing security measures for blockchain applications.
api-design-principles
Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.
principles
Provides development principles, guidelines, and VibeCoder guidance. Use when user mentions 原則, principles, ガイドライン, guidelines, VibeCoder, 安全性, safety, 差分編集, diff-aware. Triggers: 原則, principles, ガイドライン, VibeCoder, 安全性, 差分編集. Do not use for actual implementation - use impl skill instead.
ai-chapter-consolidate
Use AI to merge individual page HTML files into a unified chapter document. Creates continuous document format for improved reading experience and semantic consistency.
azure-quotas
Check/manage Azure quotas and usage across providers. For deployment planning, capacity validation, region selection. WHEN: "check quotas", "service limits", "current usage", "request quota increase", "quota exceeded", "validate capacity", "regional availability", "provisioning limits", "vCPU limit", "how many vCPUs available in my subscription".
raindrop-io
Manage Raindrop.io bookmarks with AI assistance. Save and organize bookmarks, search your collection, manage reading lists, and organize research materials. Use when working with bookmarks, web research, reading lists, or when user mentions Raindrop.io.
zlibrary-to-notebooklm
自动从 Z-Library 下载书籍并上传到 Google NotebookLM。支持 PDF/EPUB 格式,自动转换,一键创建知识库。
discover-skills
当你发现当前可用的技能都不够合适(或用户明确要求你寻找技能)时使用。本技能会基于任务目标和约束,给出一份精简的候选技能清单,帮助你选出最适配当前任务的技能。
web-performance-seo
Fix PageSpeed Insights/Lighthouse accessibility "!" errors caused by contrast audit failures (CSS filters, OKLCH/OKLAB, low opacity, gradient text, image backgrounds). Use for accessibility-driven SEO/performance debugging and remediation.
project-to-obsidian
将代码项目转换为 Obsidian 知识库。当用户提到 obsidian、项目文档、知识库、分析项目、转换项目 时激活。 【激活后必须执行】: 1. 先完整阅读本 SKILL.md 文件 2. 理解 AI 写入规则(默认到 00_Inbox/AI/、追加式、统一 Schema) 3. 执行 STEP 0: 使用 AskUserQuestion 询问用户确认 4. 用户确认后才开始 STEP 1 项目扫描 5. 严格按 STEP 0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 顺序执行 【禁止行为】: - 禁止不读 SKILL.md 就开始分析项目 - 禁止跳过 STEP 0 用户确认 - 禁止直接在 30_Resources 创建(先到 00_Inbox/AI/) - 禁止自作主张决定输出位置
obsidian-helper
Obsidian 智能笔记助手。当用户提到 obsidian、日记、笔记、知识库、capture、review 时激活。 【激活后必须执行】: 1. 先完整阅读本 SKILL.md 文件 2. 理解 AI 写入三条硬规矩(00_Inbox/AI/、追加式、白名单字段) 3. 按 STEP 0 → STEP 1 → ... 顺序执行 4. 不要跳过任何步骤,不要自作主张 【禁止行为】: - 禁止不读 SKILL.md 就开始工作 - 禁止跳过用户确认步骤 - 禁止在非 00_Inbox/AI/ 位置创建新笔记(除非用户明确指定)
internationalizing-websites
Adds multi-language support to Next.js websites with proper SEO configuration including hreflang tags, localized sitemaps, and language-specific content. Use when adding new languages, setting up i18n, optimizing for international SEO, or when user mentions localization, translation, multi-language, or specific languages like Japanese, Korean, Chinese.