AI Agent Skill HUB
multiAI Summary Pending

ux-audit

Perform comprehensive UX audits on pages, components, or features. Use when the user asks to "audit UX", "review usability", "evaluate the interface", "UX review", or wants a systematic evaluation of user experience quality.

231 stars
byaiskillstore
View on GitHubInstallation ↓

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/ux-audit/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aiskillstore/marketplace/main/skills/dami-randle/ux-audit/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/ux-audit/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How ux-audit Compares

Feature / Agentux-auditStandard Approach
Platform SupportmultiLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Perform comprehensive UX audits on pages, components, or features. Use when the user asks to "audit UX", "review usability", "evaluate the interface", "UX review", or wants a systematic evaluation of user experience quality.

Which AI agents support this skill?

This skill is compatible with multi.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# UX Audit Skill

Perform systematic UX audits using Nielsen's heuristics and UX best practices.

## When to Use

- Reviewing a page or feature before release
- Identifying usability issues
- Evaluating design decisions
- Comparing against UX standards
- Preparing for user testing

## Audit Framework

### 1. Heuristic Evaluation

Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics:

| Heuristic | Question to Ask |
|-----------|-----------------|
| System status | Does the user know what's happening? |
| Real world match | Does it speak the user's language? |
| User control | Can users undo/escape easily? |
| Consistency | Does it follow conventions? |
| Error prevention | Does design prevent mistakes? |
| Recognition | Is information visible vs. remembered? |
| Flexibility | Are there shortcuts for experts? |
| Minimalism | Is every element necessary? |
| Error recovery | Are errors clear and recoverable? |
| Help | Is assistance available when needed? |

### 2. Visual Hierarchy Check

- Is the most important element most prominent?
- Does the eye flow logically?
- Are related items grouped?
- Is there appropriate white space?

### 3. Interaction Audit

- Are clickable elements obvious?
- Is feedback immediate?
- Are loading states handled?
- Are empty states designed?

### 4. Content Evaluation

- Is copy clear and concise?
- Is terminology user-friendly?
- Are labels descriptive?
- Are CTAs action-oriented?

## Output Format

```markdown
## UX Audit: [Feature/Page Name]

### Summary Score
[Overall usability rating: Poor / Fair / Good / Excellent]

### Heuristic Scores
| Heuristic | Score (1-5) | Key Issue |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|

### Critical Issues
- [Issue requiring immediate attention]

### Recommendations
| Priority | Issue | Recommendation | Effort |
|----------|-------|----------------|--------|
| P0 | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |

### Positive Patterns
- [What's working well]
```

## Integration

Works best with:
- `ux-expert` agent for deep analysis
- `accessibility-check` skill for WCAG compliance
- `journey-map` skill for flow context