decision-logger
Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.
Best use case
decision-logger is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.
Teams using decision-logger should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/decision-logger/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How decision-logger Compares
| Feature / Agent | decision-logger | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agent for YouTube Script Writing
Find AI agent skills for YouTube script writing, video research, content outlining, and repeatable channel production workflows.
SKILL.md Source
# Decision Logger Two-layer memory system. Layer 1 stores everything. Layer 2 stores only what the founder approved. Future meetings read Layer 2 only — this prevents hallucinated consensus from past debates bleeding into new deliberations. ## Keywords decision log, memory, approved decisions, action items, board minutes, /cs:decisions, /cs:review, conflict detection, DO_NOT_RESURFACE ## Quick Start ```bash python scripts/decision_tracker.py --demo # See sample output python scripts/decision_tracker.py --summary # Overview + overdue python scripts/decision_tracker.py --overdue # Past-deadline actions python scripts/decision_tracker.py --conflicts # Contradiction detection python scripts/decision_tracker.py --owner "CTO" # Filter by owner python scripts/decision_tracker.py --search "pricing" # Search decisions ``` --- ## Commands | Command | Effect | |---------|--------| | `/cs:decisions` | Last 10 approved decisions | | `/cs:decisions --all` | Full history | | `/cs:decisions --owner CMO` | Filter by owner | | `/cs:decisions --topic pricing` | Search by keyword | | `/cs:review` | Action items due within 7 days | | `/cs:review --overdue` | Items past deadline | --- ## Two-Layer Architecture ### Layer 1 — Raw Transcripts **Location:** `memory/board-meetings/YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md` - Full Phase 2 agent contributions, Phase 3 critique, Phase 4 synthesis - All debates, including rejected arguments - **NEVER auto-loaded.** Only on explicit founder request. - Archive after 90 days → `memory/board-meetings/archive/YYYY/` ### Layer 2 — Approved Decisions **Location:** `memory/board-meetings/decisions.md` - ONLY founder-approved decisions, action items, user corrections - **Loaded automatically in Phase 1 of every board meeting** - Append-only. Decisions are never deleted — only superseded. - Managed by Chief of Staff after Phase 5. Never written by agents directly. --- ## Decision Entry Format ```markdown ## [YYYY-MM-DD] — [AGENDA ITEM TITLE] **Decision:** [One clear statement of what was decided.] **Owner:** [One person or role — accountable for execution.] **Deadline:** [YYYY-MM-DD] **Review:** [YYYY-MM-DD] **Rationale:** [Why this over alternatives. 1-2 sentences.] **User Override:** [If founder changed agent recommendation — what and why. Blank if not applicable.] **Rejected:** - [Proposal] — [reason] [DO_NOT_RESURFACE] **Action Items:** - [ ] [Action] — Owner: [name] — Due: [YYYY-MM-DD] — Review: [YYYY-MM-DD] **Supersedes:** [DATE of previous decision on same topic, if any] **Superseded by:** [Filled in retroactively if overridden later] **Raw transcript:** memory/board-meetings/[DATE]-raw.md ``` --- ## Conflict Detection Before logging, Chief of Staff checks for: 1. **DO_NOT_RESURFACE violations** — new decision matches a rejected proposal 2. **Topic contradictions** — two active decisions on same topic with different conclusions 3. **Owner conflicts** — same action assigned to different people in different decisions When a conflict is found: ``` ⚠️ DECISION CONFLICT New: [text] Conflicts with: [DATE] — [existing text] Options: (1) Supersede old (2) Merge (3) Defer to founder ``` **DO_NOT_RESURFACE enforcement:** ``` 🚫 BLOCKED: "[Proposal]" was rejected on [DATE]. Reason: [reason]. To reopen: founder must explicitly say "reopen [topic] from [DATE]". ``` --- ## Logging Workflow (Post Phase 5) 1. Founder approves synthesis 2. Write Layer 1 raw transcript → `YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md` 3. Check conflicts against `decisions.md` 4. Surface conflicts → wait for founder resolution 5. Append approved entries to `decisions.md` 6. Confirm: decisions logged, actions tracked, DO_NOT_RESURFACE flags added --- ## Marking Actions Complete ```markdown - [x] [Action] — Owner: [name] — Completed: [DATE] — Result: [one sentence] ``` Never delete completed items. The history is the record. --- ## File Structure ``` memory/board-meetings/ ├── decisions.md # Layer 2: append-only, founder-approved ├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md # Layer 1: full transcript per meeting └── archive/YYYY/ # Raw files after 90 days ``` --- ## References - `templates/decision-entry.md` — single entry template with field rules - `scripts/decision_tracker.py` — CLI parser, overdue tracker, conflict detector
Related Skills
wiki-query
Query the LLM Wiki — reads index.md first, drills into 3-10 relevant pages, synthesizes an answer with inline [[wikilink]] citations, and offers to file the answer back as a new comparison or synthesis page. Usage /wiki-query "<question>"
wiki-log
Show recent entries from the LLM Wiki log (wiki/log.md). Uses the standardized
wiki-lint
Run a health check on the LLM Wiki vault — mechanical checks (orphans, broken links, stale pages, missing frontmatter, log gap, duplicates) plus semantic checks (contradictions, cross-reference gaps, concepts missing their own page). Outputs a markdown report with suggested actions. Usage /wiki-lint [--stale-days N] [--log-gap-days N]
wiki-init
Bootstrap a fresh LLM Wiki vault with the three-layer structure, schema files, and starter templates. Usage /wiki-init <path> --topic "<topic>" [--tool all|claude-code|codex|cursor|antigravity]
wiki-ingest
Ingest a source file from raw/ into the LLM Wiki — read, discuss, write summary page, update cross-references across 5-15 pages, regenerate index, append to log. Usage /wiki-ingest <path-to-source>
tc
Track technical changes with structured records, a state machine, and session handoff. Usage: /tc <init|create|update|status|resume|close|export|dashboard> [args]
tc-tracker
Use when the user asks to track technical changes, create change records, manage TC lifecycles, or hand off work between AI sessions. Covers init/create/update/status/resume/close/export workflows for structured code change documentation.
llm-wiki
Use when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
karpathy-coder
Use when writing, reviewing, or committing code to enforce Karpathy's 4 coding principles — surface assumptions before coding, keep it simple, make surgical changes, define verifiable goals. Triggers on "review my diff", "check complexity", "am I overcomplicating this", "karpathy check", "before I commit", or any code quality concern where the LLM might be overcoding.
karpathy-check
Run Karpathy's 4-principle review on staged changes or the last commit. Checks complexity, diff noise, hidden assumptions, and goal verification. Usage /karpathy-check [--last-commit]
cs-wiki-linter
Dispatched sub-agent that runs a periodic health check on an LLM Wiki vault. Runs mechanical checks via scripts (orphans, broken links, stale pages, missing frontmatter, duplicate titles, log gaps), does semantic checks (contradictions, stale claims, cross-reference gaps, concepts missing their own page), and produces a markdown report with suggested actions. Spawn weekly, after batch ingests, or when the user says "check the wiki" / "lint my wiki" / "audit the vault".
cs-wiki-librarian
Dispatched sub-agent that answers queries against an LLM Wiki vault. Reads index.md first, drills into 3-10 relevant pages across categories, synthesizes an answer with inline [[wikilink]] citations, and offers to file the answer back into the wiki as a new comparison or synthesis page. Spawn when the user asks a substantive question the wiki might answer, says "what does the wiki say about X", "compare A and B across my sources", or wants to explore a topic.