generate
Generate Playwright tests. Use when user says "write tests", "generate tests", "add tests for", "test this component", "e2e test", "create test for", "test this page", or "test this feature".
Best use case
generate is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Generate Playwright tests. Use when user says "write tests", "generate tests", "add tests for", "test this component", "e2e test", "create test for", "test this page", or "test this feature".
Teams using generate should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/generate/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How generate Compares
| Feature / Agent | generate | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Generate Playwright tests. Use when user says "write tests", "generate tests", "add tests for", "test this component", "e2e test", "create test for", "test this page", or "test this feature".
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Generate Playwright Tests
Generate production-ready Playwright tests from a user story, URL, component name, or feature description.
## Input
`$ARGUMENTS` contains what to test. Examples:
- `"user can log in with email and password"`
- `"the checkout flow"`
- `"src/components/UserProfile.tsx"`
- `"the search page with filters"`
## Steps
### 1. Understand the Target
Parse `$ARGUMENTS` to determine:
- **User story**: Extract the behavior to verify
- **Component path**: Read the component source code
- **Page/URL**: Identify the route and its elements
- **Feature name**: Map to relevant app areas
### 2. Explore the Codebase
Use the `Explore` subagent to gather context:
- Read `playwright.config.ts` for `testDir`, `baseURL`, `projects`
- Check existing tests in `testDir` for patterns, fixtures, and conventions
- If a component path is given, read the component to understand its props, states, and interactions
- Check for existing page objects in `pages/`
- Check for existing fixtures in `fixtures/`
- Check for auth setup (`auth.setup.ts` or `storageState` config)
### 3. Select Templates
Check `templates/` in this plugin for matching patterns:
| If testing... | Load template from |
|---|---|
| Login/auth flow | `templates/auth/login.md` |
| CRUD operations | `templates/crud/` |
| Checkout/payment | `templates/checkout/` |
| Search/filter UI | `templates/search/` |
| Form submission | `templates/forms/` |
| Dashboard/data | `templates/dashboard/` |
| Settings page | `templates/settings/` |
| Onboarding flow | `templates/onboarding/` |
| API endpoints | `templates/api/` |
| Accessibility | `templates/accessibility/` |
Adapt the template to the specific app — replace `{{placeholders}}` with actual selectors, URLs, and data.
### 4. Generate the Test
Follow these rules:
**Structure:**
```typescript
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
// Import custom fixtures if the project uses them
test.describe('Feature Name', () => {
// Group related behaviors
test('should <expected behavior>', async ({ page }) => {
// Arrange: navigate, set up state
// Act: perform user action
// Assert: verify outcome
});
});
```
**Locator priority** (use the first that works):
1. `getByRole()` — buttons, links, headings, form elements
2. `getByLabel()` — form fields with labels
3. `getByText()` — non-interactive text content
4. `getByPlaceholder()` — inputs with placeholder text
5. `getByTestId()` — when semantic options aren't available
**Assertions** — always web-first:
```typescript
// GOOD — auto-retries
await expect(page.getByRole('heading')).toBeVisible();
await expect(page.getByRole('alert')).toHaveText('Success');
// BAD — no retry
const text = await page.textContent('.msg');
expect(text).toBe('Success');
```
**Never use:**
- `page.waitForTimeout()`
- `page.$(selector)` or `page.$$(selector)`
- Bare CSS selectors unless absolutely necessary
- `page.evaluate()` for things locators can do
**Always include:**
- Descriptive test names that explain the behavior
- Error/edge case tests alongside happy path
- Proper `await` on every Playwright call
- `baseURL`-relative navigation (`page.goto('/')` not `page.goto('http://...')`)
### 5. Match Project Conventions
- If project uses TypeScript → generate `.spec.ts`
- If project uses JavaScript → generate `.spec.js` with `require()` imports
- If project has page objects → use them instead of inline locators
- If project has custom fixtures → import and use them
- If project has a test data directory → create test data files there
### 6. Generate Supporting Files (If Needed)
- **Page object**: If the test touches 5+ unique locators on one page, create a page object
- **Fixture**: If the test needs shared setup (auth, data), create or extend a fixture
- **Test data**: If the test uses structured data, create a JSON file in `test-data/`
### 7. Verify
Run the generated test:
```bash
npx playwright test <generated-file> --reporter=list
```
If it fails:
1. Read the error
2. Fix the test (not the app)
3. Run again
4. If it's an app issue, report it to the user
## Output
- Generated test file(s) with path
- Any supporting files created (page objects, fixtures, data)
- Test run result
- Coverage note: what behaviors are now testedRelated Skills
wiki-query
Query the LLM Wiki — reads index.md first, drills into 3-10 relevant pages, synthesizes an answer with inline [[wikilink]] citations, and offers to file the answer back as a new comparison or synthesis page. Usage /wiki-query "<question>"
wiki-log
Show recent entries from the LLM Wiki log (wiki/log.md). Uses the standardized
wiki-lint
Run a health check on the LLM Wiki vault — mechanical checks (orphans, broken links, stale pages, missing frontmatter, log gap, duplicates) plus semantic checks (contradictions, cross-reference gaps, concepts missing their own page). Outputs a markdown report with suggested actions. Usage /wiki-lint [--stale-days N] [--log-gap-days N]
wiki-init
Bootstrap a fresh LLM Wiki vault with the three-layer structure, schema files, and starter templates. Usage /wiki-init <path> --topic "<topic>" [--tool all|claude-code|codex|cursor|antigravity]
wiki-ingest
Ingest a source file from raw/ into the LLM Wiki — read, discuss, write summary page, update cross-references across 5-15 pages, regenerate index, append to log. Usage /wiki-ingest <path-to-source>
tc
Track technical changes with structured records, a state machine, and session handoff. Usage: /tc <init|create|update|status|resume|close|export|dashboard> [args]
tc-tracker
Use when the user asks to track technical changes, create change records, manage TC lifecycles, or hand off work between AI sessions. Covers init/create/update/status/resume/close/export workflows for structured code change documentation.
llm-wiki
Use when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
karpathy-coder
Use when writing, reviewing, or committing code to enforce Karpathy's 4 coding principles — surface assumptions before coding, keep it simple, make surgical changes, define verifiable goals. Triggers on "review my diff", "check complexity", "am I overcomplicating this", "karpathy check", "before I commit", or any code quality concern where the LLM might be overcoding.
karpathy-check
Run Karpathy's 4-principle review on staged changes or the last commit. Checks complexity, diff noise, hidden assumptions, and goal verification. Usage /karpathy-check [--last-commit]
cs-wiki-linter
Dispatched sub-agent that runs a periodic health check on an LLM Wiki vault. Runs mechanical checks via scripts (orphans, broken links, stale pages, missing frontmatter, duplicate titles, log gaps), does semantic checks (contradictions, stale claims, cross-reference gaps, concepts missing their own page), and produces a markdown report with suggested actions. Spawn weekly, after batch ingests, or when the user says "check the wiki" / "lint my wiki" / "audit the vault".
cs-wiki-librarian
Dispatched sub-agent that answers queries against an LLM Wiki vault. Reads index.md first, drills into 3-10 relevant pages across categories, synthesizes an answer with inline [[wikilink]] citations, and offers to file the answer back into the wiki as a new comparison or synthesis page. Spawn when the user asks a substantive question the wiki might answer, says "what does the wiki say about X", "compare A and B across my sources", or wants to explore a topic.