Threat Modeling
This skill should be used when the user asks about "threat model", "STRIDE", "data flow diagram", "attack surface", "threat analysis", "security architecture", "component threats", "trust boundaries", "technology decomposition", or needs systematic threat identification during whitebox security review.
Best use case
Threat Modeling is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
This skill should be used when the user asks about "threat model", "STRIDE", "data flow diagram", "attack surface", "threat analysis", "security architecture", "component threats", "trust boundaries", "technology decomposition", or needs systematic threat identification during whitebox security review.
Teams using Threat Modeling should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/threat-modeling/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Threat Modeling Compares
| Feature / Agent | Threat Modeling | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
This skill should be used when the user asks about "threat model", "STRIDE", "data flow diagram", "attack surface", "threat analysis", "security architecture", "component threats", "trust boundaries", "technology decomposition", or needs systematic threat identification during whitebox security review.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Threat Modeling
## Purpose
Provide systematic methodology for identifying security threats through technology decomposition, data flow analysis, and STRIDE-based threat enumeration. This skill helps transform architectural understanding into actionable security findings.
**Key Insight**: Threat modeling answers "What could go wrong?" systematically. It bridges the gap between understanding an application and hunting for vulnerabilities.
---
## When to Use
Activate this skill when:
- After running `/vuln-scout:threats --quick` to understand the app
- Before targeted sink searching (to prioritize what to look for)
- When analyzing a new component or service
- To create visual data flow diagrams
- When systematically enumerating threats per component
- To score and prioritize security risks
---
## STRIDE Methodology
STRIDE is a threat classification framework. For each component, analyze:
| Category | Question | Example Threat |
|----------|----------|----------------|
| **S**poofing | Can identity be faked? | JWT algorithm confusion, session hijacking |
| **T**ampering | Can data be modified? | SQL injection, parameter manipulation |
| **R**epudiation | Can actions be denied? | Missing audit logs, unsigned transactions |
| **I**nformation Disclosure | Can data leak? | Error messages, log exposure, IDOR |
| **D**enial of Service | Can it be overwhelmed? | ReDoS, resource exhaustion, billion laughs |
| **E**levation of Privilege | Can access be escalated? | Broken access control, role manipulation |
---
## Threat Modeling Workflow
### Phase 1: Technology Decomposition
Break down the application into components:
```
1. Entry Points (where data enters)
- HTTP endpoints, WebSocket, file uploads, API integrations
2. Processing Components (where data transforms)
- Controllers, services, background jobs, validators
3. Data Stores (where data persists)
- Databases, caches, file systems, queues
4. External Dependencies (what system trusts)
- Third-party APIs, OAuth providers, CDN
5. Security Components (what protects)
- Authentication, authorization, encryption, validation
```
### Phase 2: Data Flow Mapping
Trace how data moves through the system:
```
[Entry Point] → [Validation?] → [Processing] → [Storage]
↓
[Trust Boundary]
```
For each flow, document:
- What data crosses each boundary?
- Where is validation performed?
- What assumptions exist?
- Where is data encrypted/decrypted?
### Phase 3: STRIDE Analysis Per Component
For each component identified, apply STRIDE:
```markdown
## Component: Authentication Service
| Threat | Category | Risk | Location |
|--------|----------|------|----------|
| Password spraying | Spoofing | HIGH | routes/login.ts |
| JWT secret in code | Info Disclosure | CRITICAL | lib/auth.ts |
| No rate limiting | DoS | MEDIUM | middleware/auth.ts |
| Role in JWT editable | Elevation | HIGH | lib/token.ts |
```
### Phase 4: Prioritization
Score threats by:
1. **Impact** (1-5): What's the damage if exploited?
2. **Likelihood** (1-5): How easy is exploitation?
3. **Risk Score** = Impact × Likelihood
Priority order:
- CRITICAL (20-25): Immediate attention
- HIGH (15-19): Next sprint
- MEDIUM (8-14): Backlog
- LOW (1-7): Accept or defer
---
## Data Flow Diagrams (Mermaid)
### Basic Application Flow
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph External["External (Untrusted)"]
User([User Browser])
Mobile([Mobile App])
ExtAPI([3rd Party API])
end
subgraph DMZ["DMZ"]
LB[Load Balancer]
WAF[WAF]
end
subgraph Application["Application (Trusted)"]
API[API Server]
Auth[Auth Service]
Worker[Background Worker]
end
subgraph Data["Data Layer"]
DB[(Primary DB)]
Cache[(Redis Cache)]
Queue[(Message Queue)]
end
User -->|HTTPS| LB
Mobile -->|HTTPS| LB
LB --> WAF
WAF --> API
API <-->|JWT| Auth
API --> DB
API --> Cache
API --> Queue
Queue --> Worker
Worker --> DB
API <-->|HTTPS| ExtAPI
```
### Trust Boundary Diagram
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph Untrusted["Untrusted Zone"]
Input([User Input])
end
subgraph TB1["Trust Boundary 1"]
direction TB
Validate[Input Validation]
end
subgraph Trusted["Trusted Zone"]
Process[Business Logic]
Store[(Database)]
end
Input -->|"raw data"| Validate
Validate -->|"validated data"| Process
Process -->|"queries"| Store
style TB1 stroke:#ff0000,stroke-width:2px
```
### Authentication Flow
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant A as API
participant Auth as Auth Service
participant DB as Database
U->>A: POST /login (creds)
A->>Auth: Validate credentials
Auth->>DB: Check user
DB-->>Auth: User data
Auth-->>A: JWT token
A-->>U: Set-Cookie / Token
Note over A,Auth: Trust boundary - validate token signature
```
---
## Component-Specific Threats
### API Endpoints
| Threat | STRIDE | Indicators |
|--------|--------|------------|
| Injection | Tampering | User input in queries/commands |
| Broken auth | Spoofing | Missing/weak authentication |
| IDOR | Info Disclosure | Direct object references |
| Mass assignment | Tampering | Full object binding |
| No rate limiting | DoS | Missing throttling |
### Authentication Components
| Threat | STRIDE | Indicators |
|--------|--------|------------|
| Credential stuffing | Spoofing | No account lockout |
| Session fixation | Spoofing | Session ID reuse |
| JWT vulnerabilities | Spoofing/Tampering | Algorithm confusion, weak secret |
| Password storage | Info Disclosure | Weak hashing (MD5, SHA1) |
### File Upload Handlers
| Threat | STRIDE | Indicators |
|--------|--------|------------|
| Path traversal | Tampering | User-controlled filename |
| XXE | Info Disclosure | XML parsing with entities |
| Unrestricted upload | Elevation | Missing type validation |
| DoS via large files | DoS | No size limits |
### Database Access
| Threat | STRIDE | Indicators |
|--------|--------|------------|
| SQL injection | Tampering | String concatenation |
| NoSQL injection | Tampering | Operator injection |
| Data exposure | Info Disclosure | Verbose errors |
| Connection exposure | Info Disclosure | Credentials in code/logs |
### External API Integrations
| Threat | STRIDE | Indicators |
|--------|--------|------------|
| SSRF | Tampering | User-controlled URLs |
| Credential exposure | Info Disclosure | API keys in code |
| Man-in-the-middle | Spoofing | No TLS verification |
| Injection via response | Tampering | Unsanitized API responses |
---
## Code Review Patterns
### Finding Components to Analyze
```bash
# Find route definitions (entry points)
grep -rniE "(app\.(get|post|put|delete)|@(Get|Post|Route)|router\.)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
# Find database models (data stores)
grep -rniE "(Schema|Model|Entity|Table)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py"
# Find external API calls
grep -rniE "(fetch|axios|requests\.|http\.)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py"
# Find auth/security middleware
grep -rniE "(auth|security|jwt|session|token)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py"
```
### STRIDE-Specific Searches
```bash
# Spoofing - weak auth
grep -rniE "(algorithm|alg|HS256|none)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
# Tampering - user input in dangerous ops
grep -rniE "(query|exec|eval|execute).*req\.(body|query|params)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
# Info Disclosure - sensitive data exposure
grep -rniE "(password|secret|key|token).*log" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
# DoS - missing limits
grep -rniE "(upload|file|size|limit)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
# Elevation - role/permission
grep -rniE "(role|admin|permission|isAdmin)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
```
---
## Output Templates
### Threat Model Summary
```markdown
# Threat Model: [Application Name]
## Overview
[Brief description of application and scope]
## Data Flow Diagram
[Mermaid diagram here]
## Trust Boundaries
1. **Client → API**: User input validation
2. **API → Database**: Query parameterization
3. **API → External Services**: Credential protection
## STRIDE Analysis
### Critical Threats
| ID | Component | Threat | Category | Risk | Location |
|----|-----------|--------|----------|------|----------|
| T-001 | Login | SQL Injection | Tampering | CRITICAL | routes/login.ts:34 |
### High Threats
[...]
## Recommended Mitigations
[...]
```
---
## Integration with Other Skills
- Use **business-logic** for workflow and trust boundary understanding
- Use **dangerous-functions** to find sinks for identified threats
- Use **data-flow-tracing** to trace specific threat paths
- Use **vuln-patterns** for exploitation techniques
- Use **exploit-techniques** to develop PoC for confirmed threats
---
## Reference Files
For detailed threat patterns:
- **`references/stride-by-component.md`** - Common threats per component type
- **`references/common-threats-by-tech.md`** - Technology-specific threats
- **`references/data-flow-patterns.md`** - Data flow vulnerability patternsRelated Skills
Workspace Discovery
This skill should be used when the user asks to "detect workspaces", "find packages", "list monorepo packages", "workspace structure", "monorepo analysis", or needs to identify workspace/package boundaries in a codebase for focused security analysis.
vulnerability-chains
This skill should be used when the user asks about "vulnerability chains", "chained exploits", "multi-step attacks", "SSRF to RCE", "pivot attacks", or needs to identify how vulnerabilities in different components can be combined during whitebox security review.
Vulnerability Patterns
This skill should be used when the user asks about "vulnerability patterns", "how to find SQL injection", "XSS patterns", "command injection techniques", "OWASP vulnerabilities", "common web vulnerabilities", "exploitation patterns", or needs to understand how specific vulnerability classes work during whitebox security review.
verify-finding
Drive a single finding through CPG verification and false-positive triage.
start-audit
Guided first-run security audit: doctor, scope, threats, scan, verify, report.
scope-repo
Decide audit boundaries for large or monorepo targets and write audit-plan.md.
review-pr
Diff-aware PR security review with verified findings and PR comment payload.
package-evidence
Bundle findings, reports, audit plan, and ledger into one evidence zip.
Sensitive Data Leakage
Detect ANY credential/secret flowing to ANY output sink. Use when asked about "credential leakage", "secret logging", "sensitive data exposure", "CWE-532", "password in logs", "token exposure", or security logging issues.
Security Misconfiguration
This skill should be used when the user asks about "security misconfiguration", "default credentials", "debug mode", "security headers", "exposed endpoints", "TLS configuration", or needs to find configuration-related vulnerabilities during whitebox security review.
Secret Scanning
This skill should be used when the user asks about "secret scanning", "find secrets", "hardcoded credentials", "leaked API keys", "git history secrets", "credential scanning", "detect passwords in code", or needs to identify secrets and credentials in source code or git history during whitebox security review.
Sandbox Escapes
This skill should be used when the user asks about "sandbox escape", "vm escape", "template injection to RCE", "SSTI exploitation", "vm2 bypass", "restricted execution bypass", "sandbox breakout", or needs to identify sandbox escape and template engine exploitation techniques during whitebox security review.