autobuild
Autonomous single-shot plan execution. Runs entire superplan implementation plans without stopping, using sub-agents for each phase. Phases write state to filesystem for resume capability. Sequential phases run in order, parallel phases (1a, 1b) run concurrently. User never needs to compact context.
Best use case
autobuild is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Autonomous single-shot plan execution. Runs entire superplan implementation plans without stopping, using sub-agents for each phase. Phases write state to filesystem for resume capability. Sequential phases run in order, parallel phases (1a, 1b) run concurrently. User never needs to compact context.
Teams using autobuild should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/autobuild/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How autobuild Compares
| Feature / Agent | autobuild | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Autonomous single-shot plan execution. Runs entire superplan implementation plans without stopping, using sub-agents for each phase. Phases write state to filesystem for resume capability. Sequential phases run in order, parallel phases (1a, 1b) run concurrently. User never needs to compact context.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Autobuild: Autonomous Plan Execution Engine
Execute entire implementation plans in a single pass with zero user intervention. Each phase runs in its own sub-agent, writing state to the filesystem. Context never exhausts because sub-agents are isolated.
## Overview
Autobuild is an **autonomous execution engine** for superplan implementation plans. Unlike `superbuild` which stops after each phase for user confirmation, autobuild runs everything to completion.
**Key Differences from superbuild:**
| Aspect | superbuild | autobuild |
|--------|------------|-----------|
| Execution | Phase-by-phase with stops | Continuous until complete |
| User intervention | Required after each phase | None (fully autonomous) |
| Context management | Manual compaction | Sub-agents isolate context |
| State persistence | In conversation | Filesystem (.autobuild/) |
| Resume capability | Manual | Automatic from state files |
---
## Reference Index - MUST READ When Needed
**References contain detailed templates and patterns. Read BEFORE you need them.**
| When | Reference | What You Get |
|------|-----------|--------------|
| **Step 1: Initialize** | [STATE-FILES.md](references/STATE-FILES.md) | State file format, directory structure |
| **Step 3: Execute phases** | [PHASE-EXECUTION.md](references/PHASE-EXECUTION.md) | Phase ordering, parallel detection, retry logic |
| **Step 3: Launch sub-agents** | [SUBAGENT-PROMPTS.md](references/SUBAGENT-PROMPTS.md) | Exact prompts for phase sub-agents |
| **Step 4: Verify and commit** | [VERIFICATION.md](references/VERIFICATION.md) | Fresh verification, commit handling |
| **Step 5: Handle failures** | [FAILURE-HANDLING.md](references/FAILURE-HANDLING.md) | Retry logic, error recovery |
| **Overall flow** | [ORCHESTRATION.md](references/ORCHESTRATION.md) | Main orchestration loop, completion handling |
**Also reference superplan documents:**
- `superplan/references/TASK-MICROSTRUCTURE.md` - TDD 5-step format per task
- `superplan/references/TDD-DISCIPLINE.md` - TDD enforcement rules
- `superbuild/references/ENFORCEMENT-GUIDE.md` - Quality gate commands by stack
**DO NOT SKIP REFERENCES.** They contain exact prompts, templates, and formats that are NOT duplicated here.
---
## CLI Arguments
```
/autobuild <plan-path> [options]
Arguments:
plan-path Path to superplan document (required)
Options:
--commit=<mode> Git commit behavior (required before execution)
- auto: Auto-commit after each phase passes
- message-only: Generate messages, user handles git
- single: One combined commit at the end
--resume Resume from existing state (default if .autobuild/ exists)
--fresh Ignore existing state, start from scratch
--dry-run Validate plan and show execution order without running
```
**Example invocations:**
```bash
/autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=auto
/autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=message-only --resume
/autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=single --fresh
```
---
## Critical Workflow
```
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| AUTOBUILD EXECUTION FLOW |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| 1. INITIALIZE | Parse args, create .autobuild/, detect stack |
| | | NO PLAN = EXIT (ask user, then exit if none) |
| v | NO --commit = STOP (require commit mode) |
| 2. LOAD STATE | Read existing state files if --resume |
| | | Identify completed phases, pending phases |
| v |
| 3. EXECUTE PHASES | For each pending phase (or parallel group): |
| | | |
| | 3a. Launch sub-agent(s) for phase(s) |
| | - Sequential phases: one sub-agent at a time |
| | - Parallel phases (2a,2b,2c): concurrent sub-agents |
| | |
| | 3b. Sub-agent executes: |
| | - Read plan section for its phase |
| | - Follow TDD micro-structure per task |
| | - Run quality gates (lint, test, typecheck) |
| | - Update plan checkboxes |
| | - Return: status, commit message, files changed |
| | |
| | 3c. Write state file for phase |
| | |
| v |
| 4. VERIFY + COMMIT | Re-run quality gates fresh (trust but verify) |
| | | Handle git based on --commit mode |
| v |
| 5. ON FAILURE | Retry once, then halt with state preserved |
| | | Parallel siblings may continue before halt |
| v |
| 6. COMPLETION | All phases done, output summary |
| | State files preserved for audit |
| |
| =====================================================================|
| Sub-agents are ISOLATED. Context never exhausts. State is on disk. |
| =====================================================================|
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
---
## Step 1: Initialize
**REQUIRED: Plan document and commit mode must be provided.**
### Argument Validation
```
AUTOBUILD INITIALIZATION
=========================
Plan: [path]
Commit Mode: [auto|message-only|single]
Validating...
```
**If no plan provided:**
```
ERROR: No plan document provided.
Usage: /autobuild <plan-path> --commit=<mode>
Example: /autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=auto
[EXIT - Cannot proceed without plan]
```
**If no --commit mode specified:**
```
COMMIT MODE REQUIRED
====================
Before I can execute this plan, I need to know how to handle git commits.
Please specify one of:
--commit=auto Auto-commit after each successful phase
--commit=message-only Generate messages, you handle git (recommended)
--commit=single One combined commit after all phases complete
Example: /autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=message-only
[WAITING FOR COMMIT MODE]
```
**NO EXCEPTIONS.** Do not proceed without explicit commit mode.
### Directory Setup
Create `.autobuild/` directory structure:
```
.autobuild/
config.json # Execution configuration
phases/
phase-0.json # State file per phase
phase-1.json
phase-2a.json
phase-2b.json
...
logs/
execution.log # Overall execution log
phase-0.log # Per-phase logs (truncated sub-agent output)
...
```
> **STOP. Read [STATE-FILES.md](references/STATE-FILES.md) NOW** for complete state file format.
### Stack Detection
Detect technology stack to determine quality commands:
```
STACK DETECTION
===============
Detected:
- Language: TypeScript
- Framework: Express
- Package Manager: pnpm
- Test Framework: Jest
- Linter: ESLint
- Formatter: Prettier
Quality Commands:
- Lint: pnpm run lint
- Format: pnpm run format:check
- Typecheck: pnpm run typecheck
- Test: pnpm test
Stack saved to .autobuild/config.json
```
---
## Step 2: Load State (Resume Support)
If `.autobuild/` exists and `--resume` (or default):
```
LOADING EXISTING STATE
======================
Found existing execution state:
- Config: .autobuild/config.json
- Phase files: 6 found
Phase Status:
| Phase | Name | State File | Status |
|-------|------|------------|--------|
| 0 | Bootstrap | phase-0.json | complete |
| 1 | Setup | phase-1.json | complete |
| 2A | Backend | phase-2a.json | failed |
| 2B | Frontend | phase-2b.json | complete |
| 2C | Tests | phase-2c.json | pending |
| 3 | Integration | phase-3.json | pending |
Resuming from Phase 2A (first incomplete)...
```
If `--fresh` specified:
```
FRESH START
===========
--fresh flag detected. Clearing existing state.
Removed: .autobuild/ (6 state files)
Created: .autobuild/ (fresh)
Starting from Phase 0...
```
---
## Step 3: Execute Phases
### Phase Ordering
> **STOP. Read [PHASE-EXECUTION.md](references/PHASE-EXECUTION.md) NOW** for phase ordering rules.
Parse plan to build execution order:
1. **Identify all phases** from plan overview table
2. **Build dependency graph** from "Depends On" column
3. **Identify parallel groups** from "Parallel With" column
4. **Topologically sort** for execution order
```
EXECUTION ORDER
===============
Batch 1 (sequential): Phase 0
Batch 2 (sequential): Phase 1
Batch 3 (parallel): Phase 2A, 2B, 2C
Batch 4 (sequential): Phase 3
Total: 6 phases in 4 batches
```
### Launching Sub-Agents
> **STOP. Read [SUBAGENT-PROMPTS.md](references/SUBAGENT-PROMPTS.md) NOW** for exact sub-agent prompts.
#### Sequential Phase
```
EXECUTING PHASE 1: Setup
========================
Launching sub-agent...
[Sub-agent executes autonomously]
[Reads plan section]
[Follows TDD micro-structure]
[Runs quality gates]
[Updates plan checkboxes]
[Returns result]
Sub-agent complete. Processing result...
```
#### Parallel Phases
```
EXECUTING PARALLEL BATCH: 2A, 2B, 2C
=====================================
Launching 3 sub-agents in parallel...
[Sub-agent 2A: Backend API]
[Sub-agent 2B: Frontend UI]
[Sub-agent 2C: Edge Case Tests]
Waiting for all sub-agents to complete...
Results received:
- Phase 2A: complete
- Phase 2B: complete
- Phase 2C: complete
Processing parallel results...
```
**CRITICAL:** Use Task tool with `run_in_background: true` for parallel phases, then collect results with TaskOutput.
### Sub-Agent Execution
Each sub-agent:
1. **Reads the plan** - Specific section for its phase
2. **Follows TDD** - 5-step micro-structure per task
3. **Runs quality gates** - Lint, test, typecheck
4. **Updates plan file** - Checks off completed tasks
5. **Returns structured result** - JSON with status, commit, files
Sub-agent does NOT:
- Run git commands (unless --commit=auto in main agent)
- Modify other phases
- Access conversation history from main agent
---
## Step 4: Verify and Commit
### Fresh Verification (Trust But Verify)
> **STOP. Read [VERIFICATION.md](references/VERIFICATION.md) NOW** for verification requirements.
**After sub-agent reports success, VERIFY FRESH in main agent:**
```
VERIFICATION - Phase 2A
=======================
Sub-agent reported: complete
Running fresh verification...
Lint: pnpm run lint ... PASS
Format: pnpm run format:check ... PASS
Typecheck: pnpm run typecheck ... PASS
Tests: pnpm test ... PASS (47 tests)
All quality gates passed.
```
**If verification fails (sub-agent claimed success but check fails):**
```
VERIFICATION MISMATCH
=====================
Sub-agent claimed success, but fresh verification failed:
Tests: FAIL
5 tests failed in src/services/auth.test.ts
This indicates a sub-agent error. Treating as phase failure.
Initiating retry...
```
### Commit Handling
Based on `--commit` mode:
#### --commit=auto
```
AUTO-COMMIT - Phase 2A
======================
git add src/api/auth.ts src/api/auth.test.ts
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
feat(auth): implement JWT token validation
- Add validateToken function
- Add token refresh endpoint
- Add comprehensive test coverage
EOF
)"
Commit created: a1b2c3d
```
#### --commit=message-only
```
COMMIT MESSAGE - Phase 2A
=========================
feat(auth): implement JWT token validation
- Add validateToken function
- Add token refresh endpoint
- Add comprehensive test coverage
Files to commit:
- src/api/auth.ts (CREATE)
- src/api/auth.test.ts (CREATE)
[Message saved to .autobuild/phases/phase-2a.json]
[User handles git operations]
```
#### --commit=single
```
PHASE 2A COMPLETE
=================
Commit message queued for final combined commit.
Continuing to next phase...
```
### State File Update
After each phase (success or failure), update state file:
```
STATE UPDATED - Phase 2A
========================
File: .autobuild/phases/phase-2a.json
Status: complete
Commit: feat(auth): implement JWT token validation
Files: 2 created, 0 modified
Timestamp: 2025-01-25T10:30:00Z
```
---
## Step 5: Handle Failures
> **STOP. Read [FAILURE-HANDLING.md](references/FAILURE-HANDLING.md) NOW** for failure handling.
### Retry Logic
On phase failure, retry ONCE:
```
PHASE FAILURE - Phase 2A (Attempt 1/2)
======================================
Sub-agent reported failure:
- Tests failed: 3 failing in auth.test.ts
- Linter: passed
- Typecheck: passed
Initiating retry...
RETRY - Phase 2A (Attempt 2/2)
==============================
Launching fresh sub-agent with error context...
[Sub-agent executes with knowledge of previous failure]
```
### Parallel Sibling Handling
If a parallel phase fails, let siblings complete:
```
PARALLEL BATCH FAILURE
======================
Phase 2A: FAILED (after retry)
Phase 2B: complete
Phase 2C: running...
Waiting for 2C to complete before halting...
Phase 2C: complete
EXECUTION HALTED
================
Phase 2A failed after retry.
Siblings 2B and 2C completed successfully.
State preserved in .autobuild/
Resume with: /autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=auto --resume
```
### Halt State
```
AUTOBUILD HALTED
================
Execution stopped due to: Phase 2A failure (tests failing)
Completed phases:
- Phase 0: Bootstrap (complete)
- Phase 1: Setup (complete)
- Phase 2B: Frontend (complete)
- Phase 2C: Tests (complete)
Failed phase:
- Phase 2A: Backend (failed after retry)
Remaining phases:
- Phase 3: Integration (blocked by 2A)
State preserved: .autobuild/
To resume after fixing:
/autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=auto --resume
To start fresh:
/autobuild docs/feature-plan.md --commit=auto --fresh
```
---
## Step 6: Completion
When all phases complete:
```
+=====================================================================+
| AUTOBUILD COMPLETE |
+=====================================================================+
Plan: docs/feature-plan.md
Duration: [calculated from timestamps]
Phases: 6/6 complete
Phase Summary:
| Phase | Name | Status | Commit |
|-------|------|--------|--------|
| 0 | Bootstrap | complete | chore(bootstrap): add quality tools |
| 1 | Setup | complete | feat(db): add user schema |
| 2A | Backend | complete | feat(api): implement auth endpoints |
| 2B | Frontend | complete | feat(ui): add login form |
| 2C | Tests | complete | test(auth): add edge case coverage |
| 3 | Integration | complete | feat(auth): wire frontend to backend |
Files Changed: [total count]
Tests Added: [count from test output]
Coverage: [if available]
State preserved: .autobuild/
[Based on --commit mode, output final instructions]
```
### --commit=auto completion
```
All commits created successfully.
Review with: git log --oneline -6
```
### --commit=message-only completion
```
PENDING COMMITS
===============
The following commits are ready to create:
1. chore(bootstrap): add quality tools
git add ... && git commit -m "..."
2. feat(db): add user schema
git add ... && git commit -m "..."
[etc.]
Full commit commands saved to: .autobuild/commits.sh
Run with: bash .autobuild/commits.sh
```
### --commit=single completion
```
COMBINED COMMIT MESSAGE
=======================
feat(auth): implement complete authentication system
This commit includes:
- Bootstrap: quality tools configuration
- Database: user schema and migrations
- API: authentication endpoints with JWT
- UI: login and registration forms
- Tests: comprehensive test coverage
- Integration: full e2e authentication flow
Phases completed: 6
Files changed: [count]
```
---
## Rationalizations to Reject
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Let me run multiple phases in one sub-agent" | **NO.** Each phase gets its own sub-agent for context isolation |
| "I'll skip the state file for this phase" | **NO.** State files enable resume and audit |
| "The sub-agent passed, no need to verify" | **NO.** Fresh verification is mandatory |
| "Let me just continue after failure" | **NO.** Retry once, then halt |
| "Sequential phases can run in parallel" | **NO.** Respect dependency order |
| "I'll batch the verification at the end" | **NO.** Verify after each phase |
| "The plan doesn't specify commit mode" | **NO.** Require --commit before execution |
| "Let me auto-commit without being told" | **NO.** Explicit commit mode required |
---
## Red Flags - STOP Immediately
If you catch yourself thinking any of these, STOP:
- "Context is getting long, let me combine phases"
- "This phase is simple, I can skip the sub-agent"
- "The retry failed, but let me try once more"
- "Sequential phases don't really depend on each other"
- "I'll write the state files at the end"
- "Verification is redundant, sub-agents are reliable"
- "The user probably wants auto-commit"
**All of these = violation of autobuild protocol.**
---
## The Iron Rules
1. **Explicit commit mode** - Never start without --commit flag
2. **One sub-agent per phase** - Context isolation is non-negotiable
3. **State file per phase** - Written immediately after completion/failure
4. **Fresh verification** - Never trust sub-agent claims alone
5. **Single retry on failure** - Then halt with state preserved
6. **Respect dependencies** - Sequential means sequential
7. **Parallel means parallel** - Launch concurrent sub-agents
8. **Resume from state** - Check .autobuild/ before starting
9. **Preserve state on halt** - Enable future resume
10. **No user intervention** - Fully autonomous execution
**Autobuild is rigid by design.** The sub-agent isolation prevents context exhaustion. The state files enable resume. The verification ensures quality. Do not rationalize around it.Related Skills
superbuild
Use when executing implementation plans phase-by-phase with strict enforcement of quality gates, tests, and Definition of Done. Triggers on "build this plan", "execute plan", "implement phases", or when user provides a plan document to execute.
teach
Transforms technical documents into rigorous learning journeys with collegiate-level mastery requirements. Uses Bloom's taxonomy progression, 80%+ mastery thresholds, and multi-level verification before advancing. Treats learning as a high school to college graduation progression. Use when user wants deep understanding, not surface familiarity.
superplan
Use when starting significant features, epics, or complex tasks. Creates multi-phase implementation plans with parallelizable phases, poker estimates, TDD-first acceptance criteria, and quality gates. Detects tech stack from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md (bypassing internet research if complete) or via codebase scan.
skulto-release-cert
Certify a skulto build for Homebrew prod release. Runs three passes — unit/lint/cross-compile, clean-slate CLI walkthrough, and security audit — then produces a certification summary.
golang-cli-review
Comprehensive code review for Golang CLI applications. Produces an actionable checklist covering error handling, CLI framework patterns (Cobra/urfave), testing, performance, security, and Go idioms. TRIGGERS: Review Go CLI, review golang command-line, code review .go CLI, audit CLI application, check golang tool, review cobra app
workspace-surface-audit
Audit the active repo, MCP servers, plugins, connectors, env surfaces, and harness setup, then recommend the highest-value ECC-native skills, hooks, agents, and operator workflows. Use when the user wants help setting up Claude Code or understanding what capabilities are actually available in their environment.
ui-demo
Record polished UI demo videos using Playwright. Use when the user asks to create a demo, walkthrough, screen recording, or tutorial video of a web application. Produces WebM videos with visible cursor, natural pacing, and professional feel.
token-budget-advisor
Offers the user an informed choice about how much response depth to consume before answering. Use this skill when the user explicitly wants to control response length, depth, or token budget. TRIGGER when: "token budget", "token count", "token usage", "token limit", "response length", "answer depth", "short version", "brief answer", "detailed answer", "exhaustive answer", "respuesta corta vs larga", "cuántos tokens", "ahorrar tokens", "responde al 50%", "dame la versión corta", "quiero controlar cuánto usas", or clear variants where the user is explicitly asking to control answer size or depth. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user has already specified a level in the current session (maintain it), the request is clearly a one-word answer, or "token" refers to auth/session/payment tokens rather than response size.
skill-comply
Visualize whether skills, rules, and agent definitions are actually followed — auto-generates scenarios at 3 prompt strictness levels, runs agents, classifies behavioral sequences, and reports compliance rates with full tool call timelines
santa-method
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.
safety-guard
Use this skill to prevent destructive operations when working on production systems or running agents autonomously.
repo-scan
Cross-stack source code asset audit — classifies every file, detects embedded third-party libraries, and delivers actionable four-level verdicts per module with interactive HTML reports.