openspec-continue-change
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Best use case
openspec-continue-change is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Teams using openspec-continue-change should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/openspec-continue-change/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How openspec-continue-change Compares
| Feature / Agent | openspec-continue-change | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.
**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
**Steps**
1. **If no change name provided, prompt for selection**
Run `openspec list --json` to get available changes sorted by most recently modified. Then use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to let the user select which change to work on.
Present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Schema (from `schema` field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
- Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from `lastModified` field)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.
**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
2. **Check current status**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
- `schemaName`: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
- `artifacts`: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "ready", "blocked")
- `isComplete`: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
3. **Act based on status**:
---
**If all artifacts are complete (`isComplete: true`)**:
- Congratulate the user
- Show final status including the schema used
- Suggest: "All artifacts created! You can now implement this change or archive it."
- STOP
---
**If artifacts are ready to create** (status shows artifacts with `status: "ready"`):
- Pick the FIRST artifact with `status: "ready"` from the status output
- Get its instructions:
```bash
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
```
- Parse the JSON. The key fields are:
- `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
- `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
- `template`: The structure to use for your output file
- `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance
- `outputPath`: Where to write the artifact
- `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
- **Create the artifact file**:
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Use `template` as the structure - fill in its sections
- Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the file
- Write to the output path specified in instructions
- Show what was created and what's now unlocked
- STOP after creating ONE artifact
---
**If no artifacts are ready (all blocked)**:
- This shouldn't happen with a valid schema
- Show status and suggest checking for issues
4. **After creating an artifact, show progress**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>"
```
**Output**
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifact was created
- Schema workflow being used
- Current progress (N/M complete)
- What artifacts are now unlocked
- Prompt: "Want to continue? Just ask me to continue or tell me what to do next."
**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
The artifact types and their purpose depend on the schema. Use the `instruction` field from the instructions output to understand what to create.
Common artifact patterns:
**spec-driven schema** (proposal → specs → design → tasks):
- **proposal.md**: Ask user about the change if not clear. Fill in Why, What Changes, Capabilities, Impact.
- The Capabilities section is critical - each capability listed will need a spec file.
- **specs/<capability>/spec.md**: Create one spec per capability listed in the proposal's Capabilities section (use the capability name, not the change name).
- **design.md**: Document technical decisions, architecture, and implementation approach.
- **tasks.md**: Break down implementation into checkboxed tasks.
For other schemas, follow the `instruction` field from the CLI output.
**Guardrails**
- Create ONE artifact per invocation
- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- Never skip artifacts or create out of order
- If context is unclear, ask the user before creating
- Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress
- Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names
- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
- Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
- These guide what you write, but should never appear in the outputRelated Skills
openspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
openspec-sync-specs
Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.
openspec-propose
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
openspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
openspec-new-change
Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach.
openspec-ff-change
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
openspec-explore
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
openspec-bulk-archive-change
Archive multiple completed changes at once. Use when archiving several parallel changes.
openspec-archive-change
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
openspec-apply-change
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
vet
Run vet immediately after ANY logical unit of code changes. Do not batch your changes, do not wait to be asked to run vet, make sure you are proactive.
software-design-review
Analyzes code based on John Ousterhout's "A Philosophy of Software Design". Identifies unnecessary complexity, shallow modules, information leaks, and design problems. Use when reviewing architecture, PRs, refactoring, or asking about code quality.