food-science

Analyzes food science topics including nutritional composition, food chemistry, food safety hazard analysis, sensory evaluation design, and food processing optimization; trigger when users discuss nutrients, food additives, HACCP, shelf life, or food product development.

564 stars

Best use case

food-science is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Analyzes food science topics including nutritional composition, food chemistry, food safety hazard analysis, sensory evaluation design, and food processing optimization; trigger when users discuss nutrients, food additives, HACCP, shelf life, or food product development.

Teams using food-science should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/food-science/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw/main/skills/food-science/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/food-science/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How food-science Compares

Feature / Agentfood-scienceStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Analyzes food science topics including nutritional composition, food chemistry, food safety hazard analysis, sensory evaluation design, and food processing optimization; trigger when users discuss nutrients, food additives, HACCP, shelf life, or food product development.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

## When to Trigger

Activate this skill when the user mentions:
- Nutritional analysis, macronutrients, micronutrients, dietary reference intakes
- Food chemistry, Maillard reaction, emulsification, gelation
- Food safety, HACCP, critical control points, pathogen analysis
- Sensory evaluation, taste panels, hedonic scales
- Food processing, pasteurization, fermentation, preservation
- Shelf life, water activity, food packaging
- Dietary assessment, food frequency questionnaire, 24-hour recall

## Step-by-Step Methodology

1. **Define the food science question** - Specify the food matrix (raw ingredient, processed product, meal). Identify whether the question is about composition, safety, processing, sensory properties, or health effects.
2. **Nutritional analysis** - Query food composition databases (USDA FoodData Central, EFSA). Report per serving and per 100g. Compare against DRIs (Dietary Reference Intakes) or RDAs. Account for bioavailability and cooking losses.
3. **Food chemistry analysis** - Identify key chemical reactions (Maillard browning, lipid oxidation, enzymatic browning, starch gelatinization). Characterize relevant physical chemistry (pH, water activity, emulsion stability, rheology). Relate to quality attributes (color, texture, flavor).
4. **Food safety assessment** - Identify hazards: biological (pathogens: Salmonella, Listeria, E. coli O157:H7), chemical (pesticides, mycotoxins, heavy metals, allergens), physical (foreign objects). Apply HACCP principles: hazard analysis, critical control points, critical limits, monitoring, corrective actions.
5. **Process optimization** - Define processing parameters (temperature, time, pH, pressure). Model thermal processing (D-value, z-value, F0 calculations for sterilization). Optimize for safety while minimizing quality loss. Consider novel technologies (HPP, PEF, UV).
6. **Sensory evaluation** - Design appropriate test: discrimination (triangle, duo-trio), descriptive (QDA, CATA), or affective (hedonic, preference). Determine panel size (trained vs. consumer), number of replicates, and serving conditions. Apply appropriate statistical analysis.
7. **Shelf life estimation** - Monitor quality indicators over time (microbial counts, chemical markers, sensory scores). Model degradation kinetics (zero or first order). Apply accelerated shelf life testing (ASLT) with Arrhenius equation for temperature-dependent reactions.

## Key Databases and Tools

- **USDA FoodData Central** - US food composition database
- **EFSA / Codex Alimentarius** - Food safety standards
- **FDA Food Safety** - US food regulations
- **CompTox (EPA)** - Chemical toxicity data
- **Mintel / Innova Market Insights** - Food product trends

## Output Format

- Nutritional composition tables: nutrient, amount per serving, % DRI.
- HACCP plan as a table: hazard, CCP, critical limit, monitoring, corrective action.
- Thermal processing: D-values, z-values, F0 calculation with target organism.
- Sensory results: panel demographics, test statistics, significance levels.
- Shelf life: degradation curves, estimated shelf life with confidence intervals.

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Food composition data source and version specified
- [ ] Serving sizes clearly defined and consistent
- [ ] HACCP analysis covers all three hazard categories (biological, chemical, physical)
- [ ] Thermal processing targets the most resistant pathogen of concern
- [ ] Sensory evaluation design includes proper controls and blinding
- [ ] Regulatory framework identified (FDA, EFSA, Codex)
- [ ] Allergen considerations addressed
- [ ] Shelf life conditions (temperature, humidity, packaging) specified

Related Skills

social-science-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Orchestrates a social science research workflow from literature review through data collection, text analysis, statistical modeling, and report generation. Use when conducting empirical social science research, policy analysis, or mixed-methods studies. NOT for pure natural science analysis or clinical trial data.

social-science-analysis

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Social science research methods including survey design, qualitative analysis, content analysis, network analysis, psychometrics, and mixed methods. Covers sociology, psychology, political science, education, and communication studies. Use when user designs surveys, analyzes qualitative data, does content analysis, builds scales, or uses mixed methods. Triggers on "survey design", "qualitative analysis", "content analysis", "Likert scale", "thematic analysis", "grounded theory", "factor analysis", "SEM", "structural equation", "psychometrics", "interview coding".

scienceclaw-verification

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Verify scientific claims, check calculations, validate experimental designs, and fact-check citations. Use when: (1) checking a claim against evidence, (2) validating statistical analyses, (3) verifying experimental reproducibility claims, (4) fact-checking references, (5) adversarial review of research. NOT for: generating new content (use scienceclaw-generation), simple QA (use scienceclaw-qa).

scienceclaw-summarization

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Summarize scientific papers, datasets, experimental results, and literature reviews. Use when: (1) condensing research papers, (2) creating literature reviews, (3) summarizing experimental findings, (4) meta-analysis synthesis, (5) creating executive summaries of research. NOT for: information extraction (use scienceclaw-ie), full paper retrieval (use scienceclaw-retrieval), or writing new content (use scienceclaw-generation).

scienceclaw-retrieval

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Retrieve scientific information from databases, literature, and knowledge bases. Use when: (1) finding relevant papers, (2) querying scientific databases, (3) cross-referencing findings, (4) building bibliographies, (5) systematic literature search. NOT for: answering questions (use scienceclaw-qa), summarizing (use scienceclaw-summarization), or data analysis (use code-execution skill).

scienceclaw-reasoning

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Perform multi-step scientific reasoning, proof construction, causal inference, and logical argumentation. Use when: (1) deriving conclusions from premises, (2) causal analysis, (3) mathematical proofs, (4) hypothesis evaluation, (5) counterfactual reasoning. NOT for: simple factual questions (use scienceclaw-qa), data analysis (use code-execution), or literature search (use scienceclaw-retrieval).

scienceclaw-qa

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Answer scientific questions across all disciplines with evidence-based responses and citations. Use when: (1) user asks factual science questions, (2) needs explanation of concepts/theories/methods, (3) multi-step scientific reasoning needed. Covers natural sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, materials, astronomy, earth science, math, CS) and social sciences (economics, sociology, psychology, political science, linguistics, history, law, philosophy, education). NOT for: opinion-based questions, non-scientific queries, or when code execution is needed (use code-execution skill).

scienceclaw-prediction

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Predict scientific properties, trends, and outcomes. Use when: user asks for property prediction, trend forecasting, or model-based estimation. NOT for: historical data lookup or real-time monitoring.

scienceclaw-ie

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Extract structured information from scientific texts: entities, relations, data tables, methods, results. Use when: (1) parsing papers for key data, (2) extracting experimental parameters, (3) building knowledge graphs from literature, (4) NER on scientific documents, (5) extracting methods/results sections. NOT for: summarization (use scienceclaw-summarization), full text retrieval (use scienceclaw-retrieval).

scienceclaw-generation

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Generate scientific hypotheses, experimental designs, and paper drafts. Use when: user asks to propose hypotheses, design experiments, or write scientific content. NOT for: data analysis or literature search.

scienceclaw-discovery

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Identify research gaps, synthesize cross-disciplinary insights, and generate novel hypotheses. Use when: user asks about unexplored areas, cross-field connections, or new research directions. NOT for: routine literature review or data analysis.

scienceclaw-classification

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Classify scientific content by discipline, methodology, topic, and quality. Use when: user asks to categorize papers, methods, or research outputs. NOT for: simple keyword tagging or non-scientific content.