multi

innovate

Identify the single smartest, most radically innovative addition to make to the current app or plan

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/innovate/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/benjaminshoemaker/ai_coding_project_base/main/.claude/skills/innovate/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/innovate/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How innovate Compares

Feature / AgentinnovateStandard Approach
Platform SupportmultiLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Identify the single smartest, most radically innovative addition to make to the current app or plan

Which AI agents support this skill?

This skill is compatible with multi.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Innovate

Identify the **single smartest, most radically innovative addition** to make to the current app or plan. Not a list of 10 safe ideas — one bold, high-leverage move that changes the game.

## Context Gathering

Before proposing anything, deeply understand the current state:

### 1. Read the Project

```
Read: README.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md
Glob: src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,py,go,rs,swift}
Grep: "TODO|FIXME|HACK|FUTURE"
```

Understand:
- What the project does and who it's for
- Current architecture and tech stack
- Existing features and capabilities
- Known gaps, TODOs, and pain points

### 2. Read Any Specs or Plans

```
Read: PRODUCT_SPEC.md, TECHNICAL_SPEC.md, EXECUTION_PLAN.md, FEATURE_SPEC.md, VISION.md
```

Understand where the project is headed and what's already planned.

### 3. Assess the Landscape

Use WebSearch to research:
- What competitors or similar projects are doing
- Emerging technologies relevant to this domain
- User expectations in this space (current year)

---

## Innovation Criteria

The proposal must score HIGH on ALL of these:

| Criterion | Question |
|-----------|----------|
| **Leverage** | Does a small implementation unlock disproportionate value? |
| **Surprise** | Would this make someone say "I didn't know that was possible"? |
| **Feasibility** | Can this be built in days, not months? |
| **Fit** | Does it align with the project's direction and users? |
| **Defensibility** | Is this hard to copy or does it create a moat? |

### Anti-Patterns (Do NOT Propose)

- Generic AI features ("add AI chat", "use LLMs for X")
- Incremental improvements that are obvious next steps
- Features that require massive infrastructure changes
- Ideas that sound cool but don't serve the actual users
- Anything already on the roadmap or in the execution plan

---

## Analysis Process

### Step 1: Identify Latent Potential

Look for:
- **Underused data** — What data does the app collect that it doesn't fully exploit?
- **Workflow friction** — Where do users leave the app to accomplish something?
- **Combinatorial opportunities** — What existing features could be combined in unexpected ways?
- **Platform capabilities** — What OS/browser/runtime features could be leveraged?
- **Network effects** — What becomes more valuable as usage grows?

### Step 2: Generate Candidates (Internal)

Brainstorm 5-7 candidates internally. Do NOT output these. Evaluate each against the criteria table silently.

### Step 3: Select the Winner

Pick the single strongest candidate. If no candidate scores HIGH on all five criteria, say so honestly rather than forcing a weak idea.

---

## Output Format

```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                        THE INNOVATION                           ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

{One-sentence pitch — what it is and why it matters}

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

WHY THIS, WHY NOW
─────────────────
{2-3 sentences on why this is the right move at this moment.
Reference specific things discovered in context gathering.}

WHAT IT CHANGES
───────────────
Before: {Current state — what users deal with today}
After:  {Future state — what becomes possible}

HOW IT WORKS
────────────
{3-5 bullet points on the core mechanism. Be specific enough
that a developer could start building from this description.}

• ...
• ...
• ...

IMPLEMENTATION SKETCH
─────────────────────
Effort: {LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH}
Files:  {Key files to create or modify}
Dependencies: {New libraries or services needed, if any}

Steps:
1. {First concrete step}
2. {Second concrete step}
3. {Third concrete step}

RISK & MITIGATION
─────────────────
Risk: {The main thing that could go wrong}
Mitigation: {How to handle it}

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

CRITERIA SCORECARD
──────────────────
Leverage:      ██████████ HIGH — {one-line justification}
Surprise:      ██████████ HIGH — {one-line justification}
Feasibility:   ██████████ HIGH — {one-line justification}
Fit:           ██████████ HIGH — {one-line justification}
Defensibility: ██████████ HIGH — {one-line justification}
```

---

## Edge Cases

| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| No README or project context | Ask the user to describe the project before proceeding |
| Project is too early stage (no code) | Focus innovation on architecture/approach rather than features |
| Project is a library/SDK (not an app) | Focus on DX innovations, API design, or ecosystem integrations |
| All ideas feel incremental | Be honest: "This project is well-optimized. Here's the best marginal gain I see:" and lower expectations |
| The argument is optional | If invoked with an argument (e.g., `/innovate payments`), constrain the search to that domain |

## Review Your Output

Before presenting:
- [ ] Proposal is ONE idea, not a list
- [ ] Scores HIGH on all five criteria (or honestly notes where it doesn't)
- [ ] Implementation sketch is specific enough to act on
- [ ] Not something already planned or obvious
- [ ] Aligned with project direction