Finishing a Development Branch
Complete feature development with structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Best use case
Finishing a Development Branch is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Complete feature development with structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Teams using Finishing a Development Branch should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Finishing a Development Branch Compares
| Feature / Agent | Finishing a Development Branch | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Complete feature development with structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Finishing a Development Branch ## Overview Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow. **Core principle:** Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the Finishing a Development Branch skill to complete this work." ## The Process ### Step 1: Verify Tests **Before presenting options, verify tests pass:** ```bash # Run project's test suite npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./... ``` **If tests fail:** ``` Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing: [Show failures] Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass. ``` Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2. **If tests pass:** Continue to Step 2. ### Step 2: Determine Base Branch ```bash # Try common base branches git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null ``` Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?" ### Step 3: Present Options Present exactly these 4 options: ``` Implementation complete. What would you like to do? 1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally 2. Push and create a Pull Request 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) 4. Discard this work Which option? ``` **Don't add explanation** - keep options concise. ### Step 4: Execute Choice #### Option 1: Merge Locally ```bash # Switch to base branch git checkout <base-branch> # Pull latest git pull # Merge feature branch git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> # If tests pass git branch -d <feature-branch> ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) #### Option 2: Push and Create PR ```bash # Push branch git push -u origin <feature-branch> # Create PR gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <2-3 bullets of what changed> ## Test Plan - [ ] <verification steps> EOF )" ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) #### Option 3: Keep As-Is Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>." **Don't cleanup worktree.** #### Option 4: Discard **Confirm first:** ``` This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <commit-list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm. ``` Wait for exact confirmation. If confirmed: ```bash git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch> ``` Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5) ### Step 5: Cleanup Worktree **For Options 1, 2, 4:** Check if in worktree: ```bash git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current) ``` If yes: ```bash git worktree remove <worktree-path> ``` **For Option 3:** Keep worktree. ## Quick Reference | Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) | ## Common Mistakes **Skipping test verification** - **Problem:** Merge broken code, create failing PR - **Fix:** Always verify tests before offering options **Open-ended questions** - **Problem:** "What should I do next?" → ambiguous - **Fix:** Present exactly 4 structured options **Automatic worktree cleanup** - **Problem:** Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3) - **Fix:** Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4 **No confirmation for discard** - **Problem:** Accidentally delete work - **Fix:** Require typed "discard" confirmation ## Red Flags **Never:** - Proceed with failing tests - Merge without verifying tests on result - Delete work without confirmation - Force-push without explicit request **Always:** - Verify tests before offering options - Present exactly 4 options - Get typed confirmation for Option 4 - Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only ## Integration **Called by:** - skills/collaboration/subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - skills/collaboration/executing-plans (Step 5) **Pairs with:** - skills/collaboration/using-git-worktrees (created the worktree)
Related Skills
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Write the test first, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass
Subagent-Driven Development
Execute implementation plan by dispatching fresh subagent for each task, with code review between tasks
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
web-asset-generator
Generate web assets including favicons, app icons (PWA), and social media meta images (Open Graph) for Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, and LinkedIn. Use when users need icons, favicons, social sharing images, or Open Graph images from logos or text slogans. Handles image resizing, text-to-image generation, and provides proper HTML meta tags.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
variant-analysis
Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis. Use when hunting bug variants, building CodeQL/Semgrep queries, analyzing security vulnerabilities, or performing systematic code audits after finding an initial issue.
wycheproof
Wycheproof provides test vectors for validating cryptographic implementations. Use when testing crypto code for known attacks and edge cases.
testing-handbook-generator
Meta-skill that analyzes the Trail of Bits Testing Handbook (appsec.guide) and generates Claude Code skills for security testing tools and techniques. Use when creating new skills based on handbook content.
ruzzy
Ruzzy is a coverage-guided Ruby fuzzer by Trail of Bits. Use for fuzzing pure Ruby code and Ruby C extensions.
ossfuzz
OSS-Fuzz provides free continuous fuzzing for open source projects. Use when setting up continuous fuzzing infrastructure or enrolling projects.
libfuzzer
Coverage-guided fuzzer built into LLVM for C/C++ projects. Use for fuzzing C/C++ code that can be compiled with Clang.
libafl
LibAFL is a modular fuzzing library for building custom fuzzers. Use for advanced fuzzing needs, custom mutators, or non-standard fuzzing targets.