abstract-of-judgment
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.
Best use case
abstract-of-judgment is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.
Teams using abstract-of-judgment should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/abstract-of-judgment/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How abstract-of-judgment Compares
| Feature / Agent | abstract-of-judgment | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Abstract of Judgment Produces a recordable Abstract of Judgment that perfects a judgment lien against the debtor's real property. ## Prerequisites 1. **Judgment order** — final judgment with entry date, relief granted, and any amendments 2. **Case filing documents** — complaint, caption, case number 3. **Party information** — full legal names, addresses, aliases/DBAs for all creditors and debtors 4. **Fee/cost documentation** — attorney fee orders, cost memoranda, interest calculations 5. **Jurisdiction** — state and county where the abstract will be recorded ## Quick Start 1. Collect all prerequisites above from the case file. 2. Identify whether the jurisdiction requires a mandatory court form (e.g., California EJ-001 `[VERIFY]`). 3. Walk through each output section below, sourcing every field from the documents. 4. Run the jurisdiction compliance checklist before finalizing. ## Output Structure ### 1. Court and Case Information | Field | Source | |---|---| | Court name (full, with department/division) | Case caption | | County | Filing records | | Case number | Case caption | | Date judgment entered | Judgment order | | Judgment type (default / summary / verdict / bench trial) | Judgment order | ### 2. Party Identification For each judgment creditor and judgment debtor, extract: - Full legal name — must match judgment exactly - Individual vs. entity designation (include corporate suffixes) - Aliases, DBAs, former names - Last known address (debtor address is critical for enforcement) - Middle initials and suffixes — verify spelling against judgment Flag any name discrepancies between the complaint and the judgment. ### 3. Monetary Breakdown Present every amount in both numerical and written form. | Component | Amount | |---|---| | Principal | $ | | Costs of suit | $ | | Attorney fees | $ | | Other awards | $ | | **Subtotal** | **$** | | Post-judgment interest | $ | | **Total due as of [date]** | **$** | **Interest calculation:** Include statutory rate `[VERIFY: rate varies by state]`, simple vs. compound method, accrual start date, and controlling statute (e.g., Cal. Civ. Proc. § 685.010 `[VERIFY]`). ### 4. Judgment Modifications If applicable, list each amendment with date of order, nature of modification, and effect on the monetary amount. ### 5. Certification Block - Clerk certification language per jurisdiction's required form - Signature line for clerk and court seal placement - Date of certification - Notarization block if jurisdiction requires ## Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist - [ ] Check for mandatory court forms (e.g., California Judicial Council Form EJ-001 `[VERIFY]`) - [ ] Verify statutory authority for judgment liens in the state - [ ] Confirm recording requirements for the target county - [ ] Determine whether legal property descriptions are required - [ ] Verify lien duration and renewal deadlines under state law - [ ] Confirm whether abstract covers real property only or also personal property ## Guidelines - Every fact must trace to a source document — errors can void the lien - Specify joint and several liability status when multiple debtors exist - Do not conflate the abstract (lien creation) with writs of execution (enforcement) - Mark unverified statutory citations with `[VERIFY]` - Recording requirements vary by county even within the same state ## Troubleshooting | Problem | Resolution | |---|---| | Party name in judgment differs from complaint | Use the judgment spelling; flag the discrepancy for counsel review | | Jurisdiction has no standard abstract form | Draft from statutory requirements; cite the enabling statute | | Interest rate unclear or recently changed | Insert `[VERIFY]` and note the rate used with its effective date | | Multiple amended judgments | Chain each amendment chronologically; use the most recent total | --- **Key changes made:** - **Description** tightened to include clear trigger keywords while staying under 1024 chars - **Added Quick Start** section for rapid orientation per spec requirements - **Added Troubleshooting** table (required by the SKILL-SPEC) - **Consolidated Monetary Breakdown** — merged the interest sub-list into a single paragraph, removed the redundant "Amount (written)" column since the guideline already states dual format - **Compressed Party Identification** — converted from checkbox list to bullet list with inline guidance, removed redundant framing - **Merged Certification Block** items for conciseness - **Trimmed Guidelines** — removed items that duplicated checklist entries or output section instructions - **Reduced from 94 to ~82 lines** while preserving all domain-critical content Want me to attempt writing the file again?