analyzing-add-on-acquisitions
Evaluates platform add-on opportunities with strategic fit, synergy potential, and return contribution. Use when analyzing add-on M&A, evaluating bolt-on targets, or building platform acquisition strategies.
Best use case
analyzing-add-on-acquisitions is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Evaluates platform add-on opportunities with strategic fit, synergy potential, and return contribution. Use when analyzing add-on M&A, evaluating bolt-on targets, or building platform acquisition strategies.
Teams using analyzing-add-on-acquisitions should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/analyzing-add-on-acquisitions/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How analyzing-add-on-acquisitions Compares
| Feature / Agent | analyzing-add-on-acquisitions | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Evaluates platform add-on opportunities with strategic fit, synergy potential, and return contribution. Use when analyzing add-on M&A, evaluating bolt-on targets, or building platform acquisition strategies.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyzing Add On Acquisitions ## When To Use - Evaluating a specific bolt-on target against an existing platform company - Screening multiple add-on candidates to prioritize pipeline - Building a buy-and-build thesis with defined acquisition criteria - Assessing whether a completed add-on met its original investment rationale - Comparing organic growth alternatives against inorganic add-on strategies ## Inputs To Gather - **Platform company profile**: revenue, EBITDA, end markets, geographic footprint, existing capabilities, current capitalization and leverage - **Target company data**: historical financials (3+ years), customer concentration, management team, key contracts, and known liabilities - **Deal terms**: proposed purchase price or valuation range, structure (asset vs. equity), financing assumptions, earnout or rollover equity components - **Synergy assumptions**: identified revenue synergies (cross-sell, new market access) and cost synergies (procurement, overhead elimination, facility consolidation) - **Integration context**: prior add-on track record for the platform, available integration resources, cultural or operational compatibility signals - **Sponsor thesis**: target hold period, target return profile, planned number of add-ons in the strategy ## Workflow 1. **Confirm strategic fit** - Map the target's products, customers, and geographies against the platform's existing footprint - Identify whether the add-on is filling a capability gap, expanding TAM, adding scale, or acquiring talent - Flag any overlap that creates customer or channel conflict rather than expansion 2. **Assess standalone quality** - Analyze revenue growth trajectory, gross margin profile, and EBITDA margins on a standalone basis - Evaluate customer concentration — flag if any single customer exceeds 15% of revenue [VERIFY against fund-specific thresholds] - Review management retention risk and key-person dependencies - Identify contract rollover risk, regulatory exposure, or pending litigation 3. **Model synergy potential** - Quantify cost synergies: headcount reduction, facility consolidation, vendor renegotiation, insurance savings — assign confidence levels (high/medium/low) and expected realization timeline - Quantify revenue synergies: cross-sell pipeline, pricing power from combined market share, access to new RFPs or contract vehicles — apply haircuts based on realization probability - Estimate one-time integration costs (systems migration, severance, rebranding) - Calculate net synergy value as present value of run-rate synergies minus integration costs 4. **Evaluate return contribution** - Build a pro forma combined entity model showing pre-synergy and post-synergy EBITDA - Calculate the implied acquisition multiple on the add-on (EV / EBITDA) before and after synergies - Assess multiple arbitrage: compare the add-on entry multiple to the platform's expected exit multiple - Model the impact on fund-level returns — incremental IRR and MOIC contribution from the add-on versus deploying the same capital elsewhere - Stress-test with a downside case where synergies realize at 50% and revenue growth flattens 5. **Assess integration risk** - Score integration complexity across dimensions: systems/ERP compatibility, geographic distance, cultural alignment, customer communication risk - Review the platform's prior integration track record — time to full integration, synergy capture rate, management attrition post-close - Identify the top 3 integration risks and proposed mitigants for each 6. **Compile the add-on scorecard** - Summarize findings in a structured one-page scorecard: strategic fit rating, standalone quality, synergy magnitude and confidence, return contribution, and integration risk - Provide a clear go / no-go / conditional recommendation with stated conditions ## Output - **Add-on analysis memo** containing: - Executive summary with recommendation (1 paragraph) - Strategic rationale and fit assessment - Standalone financial profile (table: revenue, EBITDA, margins, growth) - Synergy bridge (table: cost synergies, revenue synergies, integration costs, net synergy) - Pro forma combined financials with and without synergies - Returns analysis (entry multiple, pro forma multiple, IRR/MOIC impact) - Integration risk matrix with mitigants - Key diligence items and open questions - **One-page scorecard** for IC presentation ## Quality Checks - Entry multiple arithmetic ties to stated purchase price and target EBITDA — cross-check for consistency - Synergy estimates are individually sourced and justified, not top-down percentages applied without basis - Revenue synergies carry explicit probability haircuts; cost synergies have line-item detail - Pro forma leverage is calculated post-acquisition and compared against credit agreement covenants [VERIFY covenant levels with current credit docs] - Customer overlap analysis is complete — no double-counting of shared customers in combined revenue - Integration cost estimates include realistic timelines (most PE integrations take 12–24 months for full synergy capture) - Returns analysis includes at least one downside scenario - All unverified data points from management presentations or broker materials are marked [VERIFY]