analyzing-annuity-products

Evaluates annuity structures with guaranteed benefit analysis, fee comparison, and surrender value modeling. Use when analyzing annuities, comparing guaranteed benefits, or evaluating annuity products.

11 stars

Best use case

analyzing-annuity-products is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Evaluates annuity structures with guaranteed benefit analysis, fee comparison, and surrender value modeling. Use when analyzing annuities, comparing guaranteed benefits, or evaluating annuity products.

Teams using analyzing-annuity-products should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-annuity-products/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/finance/analyzing-annuity-products/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/analyzing-annuity-products/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How analyzing-annuity-products Compares

Feature / Agentanalyzing-annuity-productsStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Evaluates annuity structures with guaranteed benefit analysis, fee comparison, and surrender value modeling. Use when analyzing annuities, comparing guaranteed benefits, or evaluating annuity products.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Analyzing Annuity Products

Evaluates annuity structures with guaranteed benefit analysis, fee comparison, and surrender value modeling.

## When To Use

- Comparing fixed, variable, fixed-indexed, or registered index-linked annuity (RILA) products
- Evaluating guaranteed living benefit riders (GLWB, GMIB, GMAB, GMWB)
- Modeling surrender charge schedules and free withdrawal provisions
- Assessing total cost of ownership across competing annuity contracts
- Analyzing crediting strategies, cap rates, participation rates, and spread/margin structures
- Reviewing suitability of an annuity recommendation for a specific client profile

## Inputs To Gather

- **Contract prospectus or product specification sheet** — rider names, fee schedules, crediting methods, surrender periods
- **Guaranteed benefit rider details** — rollup rates, step-up frequencies, benefit bases, withdrawal percentages by age band
- **Fee schedule** — mortality & expense (M&E) charge, administrative fees, rider charges, sub-account expense ratios (variable annuities), spread/margin (FIAs)
- **Surrender schedule** — declining charge percentages by contract year, free withdrawal allowance, MVA (market value adjustment) presence [VERIFY]
- **Crediting strategy details** (indexed products) — index choices, cap rates, participation rates, floor, buffer/shield levels, crediting method (point-to-point, monthly average, monthly sum)
- **Client context** (if suitability review) — age, risk tolerance, income needs, time horizon, existing annuity holdings, tax status

## Workflow

1. **Classify the product type**
   - Determine: fixed / variable / fixed-indexed / RILA / immediate / deferred income annuity
   - Note the issuing carrier, AM Best rating [VERIFY], and state of issue [VERIFY state-specific annuity regulations]

2. **Map the fee structure**
   - Extract all explicit charges: M&E, admin, rider fees (basis points per year on benefit base vs. account value)
   - Identify implicit costs: spread/margin on indexed credits, sub-account expense ratios
   - Calculate **total annual drag** — sum of all recurring charges expressed in basis points

3. **Analyze guaranteed benefit riders**
   - Document the benefit base mechanics: simple vs. compound rollup rate, rollup duration cap, step-up rules
   - Map withdrawal percentages by attained age band (e.g., 5.0% at 65, 5.5% at 70)
   - Identify rider activation requirements: waiting periods, annuitization triggers, required holding periods
   - Note rider termination events: excess withdrawal impact, lump-sum triggers, spousal continuation rules

4. **Model surrender value trajectory**
   - Build a year-by-year projection of surrender charges from contract issue through full liquidity
   - Factor in free withdrawal corridor (typically 10% of account value or premium) [VERIFY per contract]
   - Flag MVA provisions — note whether MVA can increase or decrease surrender value based on interest rate movement

5. **Evaluate crediting strategy (indexed products)**
   - Document each available index allocation and its parameters (cap, participation rate, spread, floor/buffer)
   - Assess historical back-tested performance where available — note that back-tests are illustrative, not predictive
   - Identify whether caps/participation rates are guaranteed or subject to annual renewal at carrier discretion

6. **Run comparative analysis** (if multiple products)
   - Normalize fee comparison to a common basis (bps on account value per year)
   - Compare guaranteed income streams at identical withdrawal ages and initial premiums
   - Rank surrender liquidity by calculating breakeven year (when surrender value exceeds cumulative premium net of charges)
   - Compare crediting potential under bull, flat, and bear index scenarios

7. **Assess suitability alignment** (if client context provided)
   - Match product features to stated objectives: income guarantee vs. growth vs. principal protection
   - Flag concerns: surrender period exceeding client time horizon, rider fees eroding value for clients unlikely to use guaranteed income, 1035 exchange losing existing benefits

## Output

Produce a structured **Annuity Product Analysis Report** containing:

- **Product Summary Table** — carrier, product name, type, issue state, AM Best rating, surrender period length
- **Fee Comparison Matrix** — itemized charges with total annual cost in basis points
- **Guaranteed Benefit Rider Comparison** — rollup rates, withdrawal percentages, activation rules, termination triggers
- **Surrender Schedule Grid** — year-by-year charges with free withdrawal allowance noted
- **Crediting Strategy Summary** (indexed products) — index options, current caps/participation rates, floor/buffer levels
- **Comparative Ranking** (multi-product) — side-by-side on cost, income potential, liquidity, and downside protection
- **Suitability Notes** (if applicable) — alignment with client objectives, flagged concerns, recommendation rationale

## Quality Checks

- Verify all fee figures against the contract prospectus or product spec — do not rely on marketing materials alone
- Confirm guaranteed rollup rates and withdrawal percentages are contractual, not illustrated [VERIFY]
- Ensure surrender charge schedules match the specific share class or premium band [VERIFY]
- Flag any carrier credit ratings below A- (AM Best) as elevated counterparty risk
- Mark all cap rates, participation rates, and spreads as "current — subject to change" unless contractually guaranteed
- Note that tax treatment of annuity withdrawals (LIFO ordinary income, 10% penalty before 59.5) should be confirmed with a tax advisor [VERIFY applicable tax rules]
- Cross-check that state-specific annuity suitability standards (e.g., NAIC Best Interest model adoption) are referenced where relevant [VERIFY by state]

Related Skills

We are still matching the closest adjacent skills for this page. In the meantime, continue through the full directory.