analyzing-capital-allocation
Evaluates management capital allocation decisions across M&A, buybacks, dividends, and reinvestment. Use when assessing capital allocation, analyzing ROIC, or evaluating shareholder return strategies.
Best use case
analyzing-capital-allocation is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Evaluates management capital allocation decisions across M&A, buybacks, dividends, and reinvestment. Use when assessing capital allocation, analyzing ROIC, or evaluating shareholder return strategies.
Teams using analyzing-capital-allocation should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/analyzing-capital-allocation/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How analyzing-capital-allocation Compares
| Feature / Agent | analyzing-capital-allocation | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Evaluates management capital allocation decisions across M&A, buybacks, dividends, and reinvestment. Use when assessing capital allocation, analyzing ROIC, or evaluating shareholder return strategies.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyzing Capital Allocation ## When To Use - Evaluating how management deploys free cash flow across competing uses (M&A, buybacks, dividends, organic reinvestment, debt paydown) - Scoring management quality for equity research or investment committee memos - Comparing capital allocation track records across peer companies - Assessing whether a company's stated capital allocation framework matches actual behavior - Reviewing a shift in capital return policy (e.g., new buyback authorization, dividend initiation or cut, large acquisition) ## Inputs To Gather - **Financial statements** (3-5 years minimum): cash flow from operations, capex, acquisitions, divestitures, dividends paid, share repurchases, debt issuance/repayment - **Segment or business-unit data** if evaluating reinvestment allocation across divisions - **Management guidance and capital allocation framework** from earnings calls, investor days, proxy statements - **ROIC, WACC, and cost-of-equity estimates** — source these from company filings or broker research [VERIFY methodology consistency across sources] - **Share count and buyback execution data** (average price paid vs. intrinsic value estimates) - **M&A deal history** with acquisition multiples, stated synergies, and post-deal performance - **Peer group data** for benchmarking capital intensity, payout ratios, and reinvestment rates ## Workflow 1. **Map the capital allocation waterfall.** Break total cash generation into its deployment categories for each year: maintenance capex, growth capex, M&A (net of divestitures), dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and balance sheet accumulation. Express each as a percentage of operating cash flow. 2. **Calculate return metrics on each deployment bucket.** - Organic reinvestment: incremental ROIC (change in NOPAT / change in invested capital) vs. WACC - M&A: compare post-acquisition ROIC of acquired businesses against deal multiples and cost of capital; assess whether announced synergies materialized within stated timelines - Buybacks: compute dollar-weighted average repurchase price vs. estimated intrinsic value range; calculate accretion/dilution to per-share value - Dividends: payout ratio trend, coverage by FCF, sustainability under stress scenarios 3. **Assess consistency and discipline.** - Does actual spending match the stated capital allocation framework? - Is management counter-cyclical (buying back shares when cheap, pausing when expensive) or pro-cyclical? - Are large M&A deals concentrated near cycle peaks? [VERIFY deal timing against sector valuation multiples] - Has the company maintained investment-grade credit metrics, or has leverage drifted to fund returns? [VERIFY covenant compliance if leveraged] 4. **Benchmark against peers.** - Rank the company on reinvestment rate, incremental ROIC spread, total shareholder yield, and net debt / EBITDA relative to sector peers - Identify outlier allocations (e.g., unusually high cash hoarding, aggressive buybacks funded by debt) 5. **Score management capital allocation quality.** Use a simple framework: - **Excellent:** Incremental ROIC consistently above WACC; buybacks concentrated below intrinsic value; disciplined M&A with demonstrated value creation - **Adequate:** Mixed track record; some value-creating and some value-destroying decisions; reasonable but not optimal timing - **Poor:** Serial value-destroying M&A; buybacks at peak valuations; dividend commitments unsupported by FCF; rising leverage without corresponding returns 6. **Identify forward-looking risks and catalysts.** - Upcoming debt maturities or refinancing needs that constrain allocation flexibility - Board or activist pressure to change capital return policy - Pipeline of potential M&A targets and management appetite for deals - Regulatory or tax changes affecting buyback or repatriation economics [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific tax treatment] ## Output Produce a capital allocation analysis report containing: - **Executive summary** with overall management score and one-paragraph rationale - **Capital allocation waterfall table** (annual, 3-5 years) showing dollar amounts and percentages - **Return analysis by bucket** — incremental ROIC, buyback effectiveness, M&A scorecard - **Peer comparison table** on key allocation and return metrics - **Forward outlook** — expected allocation priorities, risks to capital return, and catalysts - **Key assumptions and data gaps** flagged with [VERIFY] where applicable ## Quality Checks - Confirm ROIC and WACC calculations use consistent definitions (operating leases capitalized or not, goodwill included or excluded in invested capital) [VERIFY] - Ensure buyback analysis accounts for option dilution — net buybacks, not gross - Validate that M&A deal multiples reflect the correct enterprise value (including assumed debt and earn-outs) - Cross-check dividend per share history against cash flow statement totals to catch timing mismatches - Verify that peer group selection is defensible (similar business model, scale, and end-market exposure) - Flag any period where a change in accounting standard distorts comparability (e.g., ASC 842 lease capitalization, revenue recognition shifts)