analyzing-emerging-markets
Structures EM economic analysis with growth, inflation, external vulnerability, and political risk assessment. Use when analyzing emerging markets, assessing EM risk, or evaluating developing economy outlook.
Best use case
analyzing-emerging-markets is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Structures EM economic analysis with growth, inflation, external vulnerability, and political risk assessment. Use when analyzing emerging markets, assessing EM risk, or evaluating developing economy outlook.
Teams using analyzing-emerging-markets should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/analyzing-emerging-markets/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How analyzing-emerging-markets Compares
| Feature / Agent | analyzing-emerging-markets | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Structures EM economic analysis with growth, inflation, external vulnerability, and political risk assessment. Use when analyzing emerging markets, assessing EM risk, or evaluating developing economy outlook.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyzing Emerging Markets Structures EM economic analysis across four pillars: growth dynamics, inflation regime, external vulnerability, and political/institutional risk. Produces a scored country or regional assessment with actionable takeaways for portfolio positioning, credit evaluation, or policy advisory. ## When To Use - Evaluating a single EM country's macro outlook (e.g., investment memo, sovereign credit review) - Comparing multiple EMs on a standardized framework (screening, relative-value ranking) - Assessing contagion risk from an EM crisis to peer economies or asset classes - Updating an existing EM view after a shock (election, commodity swing, central bank pivot, sanctions) - Supporting due diligence on EM-exposed corporates, funds, or lending facilities ## Inputs To Gather - **Country/region scope** — single country, peer group, or regional bloc - **Time horizon** — tactical (3-6 months), cyclical (1-2 years), structural (3-5+ years) - **GDP and output data** — real GDP growth, output gap estimates, leading indicators (PMI, industrial production) - **Inflation data** — headline CPI, core CPI, PPI, food/energy weight in basket, central bank target and policy rate - **External accounts** — current account balance (% GDP), reserves (months of import cover), short-term external debt / reserves ratio, net international investment position - **Fiscal position** — fiscal balance (% GDP), public debt / GDP, debt composition (FX-denominated share, maturity profile) - **FX and capital flows** — real effective exchange rate trend, portfolio flow data, FDI trends, dollarization level - **Political and institutional inputs** — governance indicators (World Bank WGI, Transparency International CPI), upcoming elections or regime transitions, geopolitical alignment shifts, sanctions exposure [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific sanctions lists] - **Commodity exposure** — net commodity exporter/importer status, terms-of-trade sensitivity ## Workflow 1. **Define scope and horizon** — Confirm which countries, what time frame, and the end-use of the analysis (investment decision, credit opinion, policy brief). This determines depth and weighting. 2. **Assess growth dynamics** - Decompose GDP into demand components (consumption, investment, government, net exports). - Identify the growth regime: commodity-led, credit-fueled, reform-driven, or remittance-dependent. - Flag structural headwinds (demographics, productivity stagnation, infrastructure gaps). - Compare consensus forecasts against base-case scenario and stress scenario. 3. **Evaluate inflation regime** - Classify the inflation environment: anchored, de-anchoring, or structurally elevated. - Assess central bank credibility: track record of hitting targets, independence from fiscal authority, forward guidance clarity. - Gauge pass-through risk from FX depreciation and global commodity price shocks. - Note food and energy CPI weights — high weights amplify volatility in headline readings. [VERIFY country-specific basket composition] 4. **Analyze external vulnerability** - Compute reserve adequacy using the IMF ARA metric or Guidotti-Greenspan rule (reserves vs. short-term external debt). - Assess current account trajectory: is the deficit funded by stable FDI or volatile portfolio flows? - Review FX regime: free float, managed float, peg, or capital controls. Identify mismatch risk if corporate/sovereign debt is heavily FX-denominated. - Check for upcoming large external debt maturities (Eurobond wall). 5. **Score political and institutional risk** - Map the election/transition calendar and assess policy continuity probability. - Evaluate rule of law, contract enforcement, and property rights — critical for FDI sustainability. - Assess geopolitical alignment risk: sanctions exposure, trade-bloc realignment, commodity-dependency leverage by external powers. - Flag social stability indicators (unemployment, inequality, urbanization pressure). 6. **Synthesize and score** - Assign pillar scores (e.g., 1-5 or traffic-light) for growth, inflation, external, and political risk. - Weight pillars according to the analysis horizon (external vulnerability weighs more for short-term; institutional quality weighs more for structural). - Identify the binding constraint — the single pillar most likely to trigger a negative repricing. - Develop base, bull, and bear scenarios with trigger events for each. 7. **Formulate actionable conclusions** - Translate the macro view into concrete implications: overweight/underweight recommendation, spread direction, FX view, or policy prescription. - State what would change the view (catalyst checklist). ## Output - **Executive summary** — 2-3 paragraph overview with headline score, binding constraint, and key call - **Pillar scorecards** — Tabular scores across growth, inflation, external vulnerability, political risk with brief rationale per score - **Scenario matrix** — Base / bull / bear cases with probability weights and trigger events - **Key risk table** — Top 5 risks ranked by likelihood and impact, with leading indicators to monitor - **Catalyst checklist** — Specific data releases, events, or thresholds that would warrant a view change - **Data appendix** — Supporting time series, charts, and source citations ## Quality Checks - Every quantitative claim cites a source and vintage date — stale data must be flagged - Reserve adequacy and debt ratios are cross-checked against at least two sources (IMF, BIS, central bank) - Political risk assessment references observable indicators, not subjective sentiment alone - Scenario probabilities sum to approximately 100% and each scenario has a distinct macro narrative - FX-denominated debt exposure is explicitly addressed when external vulnerability is elevated - Any jurisdiction-specific regulatory, sanctions, or capital-control detail is marked [VERIFY] - The binding constraint is clearly identified and linked to the recommended action