analyzing-intercreditor-agreements
Evaluates intercreditor and subordination provisions with lien priority, payment waterfall, and enforcement rights analysis. Use when analyzing intercreditor terms, evaluating subordination structures, or assessing lender priority.
Best use case
analyzing-intercreditor-agreements is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Evaluates intercreditor and subordination provisions with lien priority, payment waterfall, and enforcement rights analysis. Use when analyzing intercreditor terms, evaluating subordination structures, or assessing lender priority.
Teams using analyzing-intercreditor-agreements should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/analyzing-intercreditor-agreements/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How analyzing-intercreditor-agreements Compares
| Feature / Agent | analyzing-intercreditor-agreements | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Evaluates intercreditor and subordination provisions with lien priority, payment waterfall, and enforcement rights analysis. Use when analyzing intercreditor terms, evaluating subordination structures, or assessing lender priority.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyzing Intercreditor Agreements Evaluates intercreditor and subordination provisions with lien priority, payment waterfall, and enforcement rights analysis. ## When To Use - Reviewing an intercreditor agreement (ICA) between first-lien and second-lien lenders in a leveraged financing - Evaluating subordination mechanics in a unitranche with an Agreement Among Lenders (AAL) - Assessing enforcement standstill periods, purchase option rights, or turnover obligations before a new deal closes - Comparing intercreditor terms against market standards for a credit committee memo - Analyzing split-collateral or cross-collateral structures in multi-tranche facilities ## Inputs To Gather - **Intercreditor agreement or AAL** — full executed document (including all exhibits and schedules) - **Related credit agreements** — first-lien and second-lien (or senior/mezzanine) facility agreements to cross-reference definitions and covenants - **Collateral descriptions** — security agreements, pledge agreements, and any collateral allocation schedules - **Structural diagram** (if available) — organizational chart showing borrower/guarantor entities and lien attachment points - **Deal context** — transaction type (LBO, recap, add-on), approximate leverage levels, and whether the ICA is being negotiated or reviewed post-execution ## Workflow 1. **Classify the ICA structure** - Determine agreement type: first-lien/second-lien, senior/mezzanine, unitranche AAL, or split-collateral - Identify the controlling creditor class and the agent hierarchy - Note governing law and any jurisdiction-specific enforcement rules [VERIFY] 2. **Map lien priority and collateral allocation** - Confirm which asset categories are shared collateral vs. exclusive collateral for each tranche - Review lien subordination vs. payment subordination distinctions - Check for carve-outs (e.g., second-lien permitted to hold liens on specific asset classes) - Flag any "equal and ratable" provisions or springing lien mechanics 3. **Analyze the payment waterfall** - Trace the distribution hierarchy: fees → first-lien interest → first-lien principal → second-lien interest → second-lien principal → residual - Identify permitted payments to junior creditors (scheduled interest, excess cash flow sweeps, voluntary prepayments) - Locate any payment blockage triggers and their duration caps [VERIFY — typical market range is 179–365 days] - Assess whether the waterfall resets after a blockage period expires 4. **Evaluate enforcement and standstill provisions** - Determine the standstill period length during which junior creditors cannot exercise remedies [VERIFY — market standard varies by deal type, commonly 90–180 days] - Identify standstill termination triggers (acceleration by senior, insolvency filing, senior inaction for a specified period) - Review whether junior creditors can challenge senior enforcement actions or participate in collateral sales - Check for "X-clause" provisions allowing junior lenders to take enforcement action after standstill expiry even if senior has not acted 5. **Review purchase option and right of first refusal** - Confirm whether junior creditors have the right to purchase senior debt at par (or at a discount) upon an enforcement trigger - Note the exercise window and procedural requirements (notice periods, deposit obligations) - Assess whether the purchase option survives bankruptcy filing [VERIFY] 6. **Assess bankruptcy and insolvency protections** - Review DIP financing consent rights — can junior creditors object to senior-proposed DIP? - Evaluate adequate protection waiver scope (whether junior creditors waive rights to adequate protection on shared collateral) - Check voting and plan support restrictions — are junior creditors prohibited from supporting a plan that is not accepted by senior? - Identify "toggling" provisions that change priority upon insolvency filing 7. **Flag non-standard or borrower-favorable terms** - Incremental debt accommodation — does the ICA automatically extend to cover future incremental tranches? - Release provisions — can collateral be released without junior creditor consent in connection with permitted asset sales? - "Serta-style" uptier protections or anti-priming language [VERIFY — market adoption is evolving post-2020 litigation] - Amendment provisions — what voting thresholds are required to modify waterfall or lien priority terms? ## Output Produce a structured analysis report containing: - **Executive Summary** — one-paragraph assessment of the ICA's key risk characteristics and whether terms are market-standard or borrower/sponsor-favorable - **Structure Overview** — table identifying each creditor tranche, agent, collateral pool, and priority position - **Waterfall Diagram** — step-by-step payment distribution sequence with blockage triggers noted - **Enforcement Rights Matrix** — standstill periods, permitted remedies by tranche, and termination triggers in tabular format - **Key Risk Flags** — numbered list of provisions that deviate from market norms or create subordination risk - **Recommendations** — specific negotiation points or protective provisions to request if the ICA is under negotiation ## Quality Checks - Confirm every lien priority assertion is traceable to a specific section of the ICA — do not infer priority from deal summaries alone - Verify that defined terms (Collateral, Obligations, Discharge) are pulled from the ICA itself, not assumed from the related credit agreement - Cross-check payment waterfall terms against both the ICA and the underlying credit agreements for consistency - Ensure standstill periods and blockage periods are stated with exact day counts, not approximations - Mark any provision whose enforceability depends on state UCC law, bankruptcy code interpretation, or recent case law with [VERIFY] - Confirm whether the analysis covers all amendments, supplements, and side letters to the ICA