analyzing-m-and-a-tax-implications
Evaluates tax implications of acquisition structures with 338(h)(10), 368 reorganization, and step-up analysis. Use when analyzing deal tax, structuring tax-efficient acquisitions, or evaluating tax-free reorganizations.
Best use case
analyzing-m-and-a-tax-implications is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Evaluates tax implications of acquisition structures with 338(h)(10), 368 reorganization, and step-up analysis. Use when analyzing deal tax, structuring tax-efficient acquisitions, or evaluating tax-free reorganizations.
Teams using analyzing-m-and-a-tax-implications should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/analyzing-m-and-a-tax-implications/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How analyzing-m-and-a-tax-implications Compares
| Feature / Agent | analyzing-m-and-a-tax-implications | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Evaluates tax implications of acquisition structures with 338(h)(10), 368 reorganization, and step-up analysis. Use when analyzing deal tax, structuring tax-efficient acquisitions, or evaluating tax-free reorganizations.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyzing M And A Tax Implications Evaluates tax implications of acquisition structures, comparing asset vs. stock purchases, Section 338(h)(10) elections, Section 368 tax-free reorganizations, and basis step-up opportunities to identify the most tax-efficient deal structure. ## When To Use - Buyer or seller needs a comparative tax analysis of proposed acquisition structures - Evaluating whether a 338(h)(10) election yields net tax benefit over a straight stock purchase - Determining if a transaction qualifies as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368 - Quantifying the present value of basis step-up through amortization/depreciation - Assessing cross-border deal structures with international tax overlay (GILTI, BEAT, Subpart F) - Pre-LOI structuring advisory or post-LOI tax diligence support ## Inputs To Gather - **Deal parameters**: Purchase price, proposed structure (asset/stock/merger), target entity type (C-corp, S-corp, partnership, LLC) - **Target financials**: Balance sheet with FMV estimates for key asset classes, inside vs. outside basis positions, net operating losses and credit carryforwards - **Seller profile**: Shareholder composition (individuals, trusts, tax-exempts, foreign holders), holding periods, prior Section 338 elections - **Buyer profile**: Entity type, existing NOLs, acquisition financing structure (debt/equity mix), strategic vs. financial buyer status - **Asset detail**: Tangible asset classes with estimated useful lives, identifiable intangibles (customer lists, IP, covenants), goodwill estimate - **Jurisdiction data**: State/local tax rates for buyer and seller, nexus footprint, apportionment factors [VERIFY state-specific rules] ## Workflow 1. **Classify the target entity and deal type** - Determine target entity tax classification (C-corp, S-corp, partnership, disregarded entity) - Map proposed deal mechanics: direct asset purchase, stock purchase, statutory merger (forward/reverse), or equity interest purchase - Identify whether Section 338(h)(10) election is available (requires target to be S-corp or member of consolidated/affiliated group) 2. **Model the asset purchase scenario** - Allocate purchase price across IRC Section 1060 asset classes (Classes I–VII) - Calculate depreciation/amortization schedules for each asset class (Section 168 for tangibles, Section 197 for intangibles/goodwill) - Compute present value of total tax shield from step-up using buyer's discount rate - Identify state-level conformity or deviation from federal asset allocation rules [VERIFY] 3. **Model the stock purchase scenario (no 338 election)** - Buyer acquires stock at cost basis equal to purchase price; no step-up in target's inside asset basis - Identify trapped tax attributes: NOLs subject to Section 382 limitations, built-in gains/losses - Calculate Section 382 annual limitation (long-term tax-exempt rate × equity value of target) [VERIFY current applicable federal rate] - Assess successor liability exposure and its tax implications 4. **Model the 338(h)(10) election scenario** - Treat the stock purchase as a deemed asset sale for tax purposes - Calculate deemed sale price (ADSP) using the formula: purchase price + target liabilities + tax on deemed sale - Run iterative tax calculation (deemed sale tax is circular — the tax affects ADSP which affects the tax) - Allocate ADSP across Section 1060 classes to establish new inside basis - Compare buyer step-up benefit against incremental seller tax cost; determine net deal benefit and who bears it 5. **Evaluate Section 368 reorganization qualification** - Test applicable reorganization type: Type A (statutory merger), Type B (stock-for-stock), Type C (stock-for-assets), or triangular variants - Verify continuity of interest (COI): at least 40% of consideration must be acquirer stock (based on IRS ruling guidelines) [VERIFY current COI threshold] - Verify continuity of business enterprise (COBE): acquirer must continue target's historic business or use a significant portion of target's assets - Assess boot received by target shareholders and resulting gain recognition under Section 356 - Identify potential disqualifying elements (cash consideration exceeding limits, step-transaction doctrine risks) 6. **Cross-border and international overlay** - If target has foreign operations: evaluate GILTI inclusions (Section 951A), Subpart F income, and Section 245A dividends-received deduction - Assess BEAT applicability if post-acquisition base erosion payments exceed thresholds [VERIFY current BEAT base erosion percentage threshold] - Review treaty implications for withholding on cross-border payments - Evaluate Section 367 toll charges on outbound transfers of assets to foreign entities 7. **Comparative structure analysis** - Build side-by-side comparison matrix: asset purchase vs. stock purchase vs. 338(h)(10) vs. 368 reorganization - Quantify after-tax cost to buyer and after-tax proceeds to seller under each structure - Calculate net present value differential across structures - Identify structure-specific risks: successor liability (asset vs. stock), Section 382 limitations, recapture exposure - Flag purchase price allocation sensitivities and negotiation leverage points ## Output - **Structure comparison matrix**: Side-by-side table showing total tax cost/benefit for buyer and seller under each modeled structure - **Step-up analysis**: Asset class allocation with depreciation/amortization schedules and PV of tax shield - **338(h)(10) analysis**: ADSP calculation, iterative tax computation, and net benefit quantification - **368 qualification assessment**: Pass/fail on each requirement (COI, COBE, boot limits) with supporting rationale - **Recommended structure**: Identification of optimal structure with quantified tax savings and key assumptions - **Risk flags**: Successor liability, Section 382 limitations, recapture triggers, state nonconformity issues ## Quality Checks - Verify Section 1060 allocation sums to total purchase price (no residual gaps) - Confirm 338(h)(10) circular tax calculation converges (iterate until delta < $1) - Validate Section 382 limitation uses current long-term tax-exempt rate [VERIFY] - Cross-check that 368 analysis addresses all statutory requirements for the specific reorganization type claimed - Ensure state tax analysis covers all jurisdictions where buyer and target have nexus [VERIFY state conformity with federal elections] - Confirm discount rate used for PV calculations is consistent with buyer's weighted average cost of capital - Flag any assumed asset FMVs that lack appraisal support as [VERIFY]