analyzing-tender-offer-economics
Evaluates tender offer structures with premium analysis, proration risk, and conditional tender strategies. Use when analyzing tender offers, calculating tender economics, or evaluating proration scenarios.
Best use case
analyzing-tender-offer-economics is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Evaluates tender offer structures with premium analysis, proration risk, and conditional tender strategies. Use when analyzing tender offers, calculating tender economics, or evaluating proration scenarios.
Teams using analyzing-tender-offer-economics should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/analyzing-tender-offer-economics/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How analyzing-tender-offer-economics Compares
| Feature / Agent | analyzing-tender-offer-economics | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Evaluates tender offer structures with premium analysis, proration risk, and conditional tender strategies. Use when analyzing tender offers, calculating tender economics, or evaluating proration scenarios.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Analyzing Tender Offer Economics Evaluates tender offer structures including premium/discount analysis, proration mechanics, conditional tender strategies, and expected-value modeling for event-driven investment decisions. ## When To Use - A company or activist announces a tender offer (self-tender, third-party, or Dutch auction) and you need to quantify the trade - Evaluating whether to tender shares, hold through expiration, or trade around the offer - Modeling proration outcomes when the offer is oversubscribed or partial - Comparing conditional vs. unconditional tender strategies - Assessing odd-lot exemptions, back-end merger terms, or two-tier offer structures ## Inputs To Gather - **Offer terms**: Price per share (or price range for Dutch auction), number of shares sought, minimum/maximum conditions, expiration date and extension provisions - **Current market data**: Undisturbed price (pre-announcement), current trading price, 30/60/90-day VWAP, shares outstanding, public float - **Ownership structure**: Top holders and known tender intentions, insider ownership, index fund holdings (typically do not tender), short interest - **Conditions**: Minimum tender condition (e.g., majority of outstanding), financing condition, regulatory approvals, MAC clauses - **Back-end terms**: If two-tier, what consideration applies to non-tendered shares; merger agreement terms if applicable - **Timeline**: Offer launch date, initial expiration, any extension rights, expected regulatory review period [VERIFY against current SEC Rule 14e-1 timing requirements] ## Workflow 1. **Calculate the gross spread** - Gross spread = Offer price − Current market price - Annualize the spread: (Gross spread / Current price) × (365 / Days to expected close) - Compare offer premium to undisturbed price, 30-day VWAP, and 52-week high/low 2. **Model proration risk** - Estimate total shares likely tendered: start with float, subtract likely non-tenderers (index funds ~unlikely to tender in partial offers, insiders with lock-ups, short sellers) - Proration factor = Shares sought / Estimated shares tendered - If proration factor < 1.0, calculate blended return: (Proration % × Offer price) + ((1 − Proration %) × Expected back-end price) - Sensitivity-test proration at 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% participation rates 3. **Evaluate conditional tender strategies** - Odd-lot tenders (< 100 shares): determine if odd-lot exemption applies — if so, odd lots avoid proration [VERIFY: confirm offer documents specify odd-lot priority] - Conditional tenders: model the payoff if you set a minimum acceptance condition (e.g., "I tender only if proration ≥ 80%") — reduces downside if proration is severe but risks missing the offer entirely - Guaranteed delivery procedures: note deadlines for late tenders 4. **Assess deal-break/extension scenarios** - Probability-weight outcomes: (P(completion) × Tendered return) + (P(failure) × Post-break price) - Estimate post-break price using pre-announcement level, peer multiples, or stated activist floor - Factor in extension risk: each extension delays the annualized return; model 1–2 extensions 5. **Analyze two-tier and squeeze-out economics** - If back-end merger at same price: tender is economically neutral except for time-value - If back-end at lower price or uncertain: quantify the penalty for non-tender - Appraisal rights: note jurisdiction and whether appraisal arbitrage is viable [VERIFY: state appraisal statute — Delaware § 262 vs. other jurisdictions] 6. **Compile expected-value summary** - Build a scenario table: Bull (high proration, quick close), Base, Bear (low proration, extensions, or deal break) - Assign probabilities and calculate weighted expected return - Express as annualized return and absolute dollar P&L per share ## Output - **Premium analysis table**: Offer price vs. undisturbed, VWAP, 52-week range — with percentage premiums - **Proration sensitivity matrix**: Expected blended return at varying participation rates - **Scenario-weighted expected value**: Bull / Base / Bear with probabilities, per-share returns, and annualized returns - **Strategy recommendation**: Tender unconditionally, tender conditionally (with threshold), hold for back-end, or avoid — with rationale - **Risk factors**: Key conditions that could alter the analysis (regulatory, financing, minimum condition waiver) - **Timeline**: Key dates with days-to-close assumptions ## Quality Checks - Confirm offer price and share counts match the Schedule TO or Offer to Purchase filing [VERIFY against SEC EDGAR filings] - Validate that proration math accounts for shares sought, not total outstanding - Ensure annualized return calculations use realistic close dates (not just the initial expiration) - Cross-check odd-lot exemption applicability — not all tender offers include it - Verify minimum condition threshold and whether the offeror has discretion to waive it - Flag any regulatory approvals (HSR, CFIUS, sector-specific) that could delay or block completion [VERIFY] - Confirm back-end merger terms are sourced from the definitive agreement, not press release summaries
Related Skills
conducting-health-economics-research
Structures cost-effectiveness and health economic analyses with QALY calculations and model validation. Use when conducting health economics research, calculating QALYs, or building economic models.
analyzing-vital-statistics
Structures vital records analysis with birth, death, and demographic trend reporting. Use when analyzing vital statistics, interpreting mortality data, or reporting demographic trends.
analyzing-social-determinants-of-health
Maps social determinants affecting health outcomes with intervention strategy development. Use when analyzing SDOH, mapping community resources, or designing social health interventions.
analyzing-pharmacovigilance-data
Structures post-marketing safety surveillance with signal detection and PSUR reporting. Use when analyzing safety signals, preparing PSURs, or managing pharmacovigilance data.
analyzing-flow-cytometry
Interprets flow cytometry panels for hematologic malignancy classification and minimal residual disease. Use when analyzing flow cytometry, classifying lymphomas/leukemias, or documenting immunophenotyping.
analyzing-epidemiological-data
Structures epidemiologic analysis with incidence, prevalence, rate calculations, and statistical inference. Use when calculating disease rates, analyzing epi data, or interpreting population statistics.
analyzing-clinical-trial-data
Structures clinical trial data analysis with primary endpoint evaluation and safety reporting. Use when analyzing trial results, evaluating endpoints, or preparing statistical reports.
analyzing-clinical-data-warehouses
Structures clinical data warehouse queries for quality measurement, research, and operational analytics. Use when querying clinical data, building analytics reports, or extracting research datasets.
tender-of-defense
Drafts a contractual tender of defense letter demanding a contracting party assume defense and indemnification in pending litigation. Analyzes indemnity provisions, insurance requirements, and notice obligations. Use when drafting tender of defense letters, indemnification demands, defense cost-shifting correspondence, or contractual indemnity demands involving subcontractors, vendors, property managers, or service providers.
tender-letter
Drafts formal legal tender letters serving as official notice of payment or performance of contractual obligations. Grounds the letter in contracts, invoices, and correspondence to protect the sender's legal position. Use when drafting tender of payment letters, tender of performance notices, or formal fulfillment communications in litigation or pre-litigation contexts.
tender-denial
Drafts legally defensible denial letters rejecting tendered defense and indemnification demands. Analyzes indemnification provisions, builds substantive and procedural grounds for denial, preserves rights, and positions client for coverage litigation. Use when denying tender obligations, rejecting indemnification demands, responding to defense tenders, or drafting coverage denial correspondence.
intrastate-offering
Produces a compliance memo and execution plan for U.S. intrastate securities offerings under Rule 147 or Rule 147A with state registration by qualification. Covers safe harbor selection, doing-business tests, residency verification, advertising controls, resale restrictions, integration analysis, and blue sky registration. Trigger when the user mentions intrastate offering, Rule 147, Rule 147A, registration by qualification, single-state offering, Section 3(a)(11), state-only fundraising, in-state investor requirements, resale restriction legends, or says "we're only raising in one state."