appellant-brief
Drafts the appellant's opening brief challenging a lower court decision in federal or state appellate courts. Covers issue selection, standard of review framing, record citation, argument structure, and procedural compliance under FRAP 28/32 or state equivalents. Use when preparing an appellant's opening brief, selecting appellate issues, structuring appellate arguments, or demonstrating reversible error on appeal.
Best use case
appellant-brief is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts the appellant's opening brief challenging a lower court decision in federal or state appellate courts. Covers issue selection, standard of review framing, record citation, argument structure, and procedural compliance under FRAP 28/32 or state equivalents. Use when preparing an appellant's opening brief, selecting appellate issues, structuring appellate arguments, or demonstrating reversible error on appeal.
Teams using appellant-brief should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/appellant-brief/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How appellant-brief Compares
| Feature / Agent | appellant-brief | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts the appellant's opening brief challenging a lower court decision in federal or state appellate courts. Covers issue selection, standard of review framing, record citation, argument structure, and procedural compliance under FRAP 28/32 or state equivalents. Use when preparing an appellant's opening brief, selecting appellate issues, structuring appellate arguments, or demonstrating reversible error on appeal.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Appellate Brief — Appellant Drafts the appellant's opening brief demonstrating reversible error through the record while overcoming deference to the court below. ## Prerequisites 1. **Lower court decision** — opinion, order, or judgment being appealed 2. **Trial record** — transcripts, exhibits, motions, and orders 3. **Preservation map** — where each issue was raised and ruled on below 4. **Appellate rules** — FRAP 28/32 or state equivalent, local rules, word limits 5. **Filing deadline** — from notice of appeal or court order ## Output Structure ### Front Matter | Element | Notes | |---|---| | Cover page | Appellant typically red under FRAP 32 [VERIFY] | | Corporate disclosure | If applicable | | Table of Contents | Use argumentative headings | | Table of Authorities | Include pin cites | | Jurisdictional statement | Basis, finality, timeliness | ### Statement of Issues - Frame 1–3 issues as questions suggesting reversal - Each must have been preserved below - Order strongest to weakest ### Statement of the Case **Procedural history**: filing, key motions, rulings, judgment, post-trial motions. **Statement of facts**: - Narrate from the record favoring reversal - Cite record extensively (transcript pages, exhibit numbers) - Include facts the lower court overlooked or mischaracterized - Be scrupulously accurate — misrepresenting the record destroys credibility ### Summary of Argument 1–2 pages; each paragraph maps to a major argument heading. ### Argument For each issue: | Step | Content | |---|---| | Standard of review | Identify and cite controlling authority | | Preservation | Where raised and ruled on below | | Legal framework | Governing rule with controlling authority | | Error identification | What the lower court got wrong | | Application | Correct application of law to record requires reversal | | Prejudice/harm | Error affected the outcome (not harmless) | ### Conclusion State specific relief: reverse, reverse and remand, or reverse and render. ### Certificates and Addenda - Certificate of Compliance (word count, typeface) - Certificate of Service - Addendum with constitutional/statutory provisions or key orders, if required ## Standard of Review Quick Reference | Standard | Burden on Appellant | Framing Strategy | |---|---|---| | De novo | Show correct legal interpretation | Make strongest affirmative case for your reading | | Abuse of discretion | Show irrational or unsupported reasoning | Attack the logic and evidentiary basis | | Clearly erroneous | Show finding against clear weight of evidence | Marshal record evidence contradicting the finding | ## Guidelines - **Fewer issues win** — select 1–3 strong issues; scattershot briefing dilutes credibility - Cite the record relentlessly — appellate courts decide on the record, not new arguments - Use argumentative headings that state conclusions - Distinguish unfavorable authority rather than ignoring it - Address harmless error proactively for each issue - Never misrepresent the record — appellate judges check citations - Verify all authority or mark `[VERIFY]` - Jurisdiction note: confirm FRAP vs. state appellate rules; local rules may impose additional requirements
Related Skills
summary-judgment-brief
Drafts FRCP 56 summary judgment motion briefs for U.S. commercial litigation. Synthesizes discovery evidence with controlling authority to show no genuine dispute of material fact. Use when drafting MSJ briefs, dispositive motions, or partial summary judgment papers post-discovery.
reply-brief-appellant
Drafts an appellant's Reply Brief that rebuts the appellee's response and reinforces the case for reversal. Triggers when drafting appellant reply briefs, appellate rebuttals, or the final pre-argument written submission.
policy-brief
Generates structured public policy briefs analyzing legislation across economic, social, legal, and implementation dimensions. Use when drafting legislative impact analyses, policy summaries, regulatory briefs, or government affairs memoranda for lawmakers, lobbyists, or civic organizations.
mediation-brief
Drafts mediation briefs for commercial litigation that educate the mediator on facts, law, damages, and litigation risks while advancing settlement. Use when preparing for mediation sessions, drafting pre-mediation submissions, or creating settlement briefs.
markman-hearing-brief
Drafts Markman Hearing Briefs for patent claim construction under the Phillips framework. Structures disputed-term analysis from intrinsic evidence (claims, specification, prosecution history) with local-rule-compliant formatting. Use when preparing claim construction briefs, Markman hearing submissions, or patent claim interpretation arguments in US federal court.
extend-time-brief
Drafts appellate motions to extend time for filing briefs (opening, answering, or reply) in U.S. appellate courts. Demonstrates good cause through specific verifiable facts, addresses opposing counsel's position, and ensures rule compliance. Use when drafting extension of time motions, appellate deadline extensions, or briefing schedule modifications.
case-briefs
Generates structured case briefs from judicial opinions. Use when the user provides a court opinion and needs a case brief, case summary, or distillation of a judicial decision for legal research.
appellees-response-brief
Drafts an Appellee's Response Brief defending the trial court's judgment and arguing for affirmance. Covers standard of review analysis, record-based rebuttal, authority distinction, and procedural compliance. Trigger when drafting appellee briefs, response briefs, answering briefs, or defending trial court judgments on appeal.
appellee-response-brief
Drafts appellee response briefs for federal and state appellate courts, exploiting standards of review and record evidence to defend trial court decisions. Trigger when the user needs to respond to an appellant's opening brief or defend a favorable lower court ruling on appeal.
amicus-curiae-brief
Drafts filing-ready U.S. amicus curiae briefs with rule-anchored compliance, additive thesis selection, record-safe fact handling, and verified authority control. Trigger when asked to draft an amicus or friend-of-the-court brief, prepare FRAP 29/32 or Supreme Court Rule 37 amicus filings, draft consent/leave or disclosure language, or handle amicus procedural requirements at any stage.
amicus-brief
Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook-ready citations. Use when asked to draft or review an amicus brief, friend-of-the-court brief, non-party brief, or anything involving FRAP 29, Supreme Court Rule 37, or appellate amicus practice.
skill-name
Replace with a specific description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include keywords that help agents identify relevant tasks.