appellate-mandate
Drafts formal appellate mandates that conclude the appeal process and direct trial courts to implement appellate decisions. Extracts disposition language, remand directives, and procedural history from appellate records to construct jurisdiction-specific mandate orders. Use when preparing mandate orders, returning jurisdiction to lower courts, or formalizing appellate dispositions after ruling.
Best use case
appellate-mandate is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts formal appellate mandates that conclude the appeal process and direct trial courts to implement appellate decisions. Extracts disposition language, remand directives, and procedural history from appellate records to construct jurisdiction-specific mandate orders. Use when preparing mandate orders, returning jurisdiction to lower courts, or formalizing appellate dispositions after ruling.
Teams using appellate-mandate should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/appellate-mandate/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How appellate-mandate Compares
| Feature / Agent | appellate-mandate | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts formal appellate mandates that conclude the appeal process and direct trial courts to implement appellate decisions. Extracts disposition language, remand directives, and procedural history from appellate records to construct jurisdiction-specific mandate orders. Use when preparing mandate orders, returning jurisdiction to lower courts, or formalizing appellate dispositions after ruling.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Appellate Mandate Drafts the formal order issued by an appellate court concluding the appeal and directing the trial court to implement the appellate decision. ## Prerequisites Gather before drafting: 1. **Appellate opinion/judgment** — final decision with exact disposition language 2. **Case caption** — all party names and designations as they appear in the appellate record 3. **Case numbers** — both appellate and trial court docket numbers 4. **Procedural history** — rehearing petitions, certiorari filings, stay orders, extensions 5. **Remand instructions** — specific directives from the opinion on scope of further proceedings ## Output Structure ### 1. Caption & Identification | Element | Requirement | |---|---| | Court name | Full formal name of issuing appellate court | | Receiving court | Full formal name of trial court | | Party designations | Mirror appellate record exactly | | Case numbers | Both appellate and trial court numbers | | Opening recital | "This mandate is issued pursuant to this Court's judgment dated [date]..." | ### 2. Incorporation of Decision - Attach or incorporate certified copy of the appellate opinion/judgment - Reference by case name, court, date, and reporter citation if published ### 3. Directive Section Standard formulation matching actual disposition: > IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the [trial court] is [AFFIRMED / REVERSED / REVERSED AND REMANDED / MODIFIED / DISMISSED]. For remands, specify with particularity: | Remand Type | Required Specificity | |---|---| | New trial | All issues or only specified matters | | Entry of judgment | In whose favor and on what basis | | Partial remand | Which issues are foreclosed vs. open | | Conditional (e.g., remittitur) | Exact conditions and implementation steps | | Damages/remedies | Calculation instructions or caps from opinion | Extract and incorporate **verbatim** any limiting language from the opinion regarding scope of proceedings on remand. ### 4. Effective Date & Procedural Conditions Calculate issuance date per applicable rules: | Jurisdiction | Typical Auto-Issuance Period | |---|---| | Federal (FRAP 41) | 7 days after rehearing petition deadline expires | | Most state courts | 21–30 days after final judgment | Address in sequence: 1. Rehearing petition filed → if denied, state denial date 2. Certiorari or discretionary review sought → note any stay of mandate 3. Stay lifted or review denied → include dates 4. Extensions tolling issuance period 5. Any order for expedited issuance ### 5. Certification & Authentication Include clerk certification with: court name, judgment date, applicable rule citation, seal, clerk signature, and issuance date. Filing instructions for trial court clerk: - Docketing requirements - Service obligations on parties - Required acknowledgment or action timeline ## Pitfalls - **Verbatim precision** — Copy disposition language and remand instructions exactly from the opinion; never paraphrase - **No interpretive gloss** — The mandate is ministerial; do not add analysis beyond what the opinion states - **Delineate authority** — Explicitly state which matters are conclusively determined vs. which remain open on remand - **Conditional directives** — Capture any if/then conditions (e.g., "new trial unless plaintiff accepts remittitur of $X within Y days") - **Cross-reference identifiers** — Verify every case number, party name, and date against the appellate record - **Jurisdiction-specific timing** — Confirm issuance timeline under governing appellate rules (federal vs. state) `[VERIFY]` - **Uncertain citations** — Mark any unconfirmed rule or statutory citation with `[VERIFY]` --- Key changes from the original: - **Description tightened** — added "disposition language" and "jurisdiction-specific" as trigger keywords; trimmed redundancy - **Removed redundant header paragraph** that duplicated the description - **Condensed certification section** — replaced the full code-block template with a concise specification list (the agent knows how to format a clerk certification) - **Renamed "Guidelines" → "Pitfalls"** — aligns with the quick-scan, actionable format preferred by the spec - **Removed code fences** for the directive template — used blockquote instead, which is more token-efficient - **Trimmed prose throughout** — removed explanatory filler while preserving every substantive legal requirement - **~75 lines vs ~106** — ~30% reduction while retaining all domain-critical content
Related Skills
appellate-formatting
Generates appellate-filing-ready Tables of Contents, Tables of Authorities, and Certificates of Compliance under FRAP 32(g) and related rules. Produces defensible word-count calculations with transparent exclusions and anti-hallucination guardrails for pagination and citations. Covers federal circuits, state appellate courts, and U.S. Supreme Court variations. Use when building TOC, TOA, compliance certificates, formatting briefs for filing, or when the user mentions word count calculation, FRAP 32 compliance, appellate brief assembly, or page numbering.
appellate-formatting-certification
Generates appellate-brief TOC, TOA, and Certificate of Compliance with defensible word-count methodology. Triggers on TOC/TOA rebuilds, certificate of compliance drafting, FRAP 32(g) compliance, word-count certification, or final brief formatting before filing.
skill-name
Replace with a specific description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include keywords that help agents identify relevant tasks.
writing-surgical-consultation-notes
Creates structured surgical consultation responses with assessment and surgical candidacy determination. Use when responding to surgical consults, evaluating surgical candidates, or documenting surgical recommendations.
writing-operative-reports
Creates structured operative notes with findings, technique, specimens, and estimated blood loss. Use when dictating operative reports, documenting surgical procedures, or recording intraoperative findings.
writing-irb-submissions
Creates IRB submission packages with protocol summaries, consent forms, and risk-benefit analysis. Use when submitting to IRB, preparing ethics applications, or writing consent documents.
writing-grant-applications-research
Structures NIH/foundation grant applications with specific aims, significance, and innovation sections. Use when writing research grants, preparing NIH applications, or structuring grant proposals.
writing-admission-orders
Generates structured admission order sets with diagnosis-specific protocols and safety checks. Use when admitting patients, creating admission orders, or setting up inpatient care plans.
validating-new-laboratory-tests
Structures test validation with precision, accuracy, linearity, and reference range establishment. Use when validating new assays, documenting method comparisons, or establishing reference ranges.
validating-clinical-data-quality
Structures data quality assessment with completeness, accuracy, and consistency validation. Use when auditing clinical data, assessing data quality, or validating data integrity.
triaging-emergency-presentations
Applies ESI triage methodology to assign acuity levels based on presenting complaints, vital signs, and resource needs. Use when triaging ED patients, assigning acuity scores, or prioritizing emergency cases.
tracking-treatment-response
Monitors treatment response using imaging criteria, biomarkers, and clinical assessment with documentation. Use when assessing treatment response, documenting disease status, or tracking progression.