authority-verification

Produces an attorney-grade audit memorandum assessing whether written discovery responses are legally binding and timely. Use this skill when the user mentions verification audit, discovery verification, proof of service review, signature authority, perjury clause compliance, deadline computation, mailbox rule extensions, service defects, waiver risk, or motion-to-compel deadline analysis. Also trigger when the user references FRCP 33(b)(3) verification, CCP 2015.5, 28 U.S.C. 1746, attorney vs. party verification, or asks for help checking whether discovery responses are properly executed. Even if the user just says "check these responses for defects" or "is this verification valid," use this skill.

Cross-references a judge's decision, court opinion, or final order against one or more hearing/trial/deposition transcripts to verify whether the record supports each finding. Produces strict dual-citation blocks with document names, page/line references, and verbatim quotes from both sources. Use when preparing appellate review, post-trial motions, record discrepancy audits, or transcript-based fact checks of judicial findings.

Drafts California Superior Court discovery verification pages under CCP §§ 2030.250 and 2031.250 with proper CCP § 2015.5 perjury declarations. Trigger when the user needs a verification page for interrogatory or inspection/RPD responses, mentions California discovery verification, party vs. attorney signing, information-and-belief clauses, or fixing unverified responses. CA Superior Court only — not federal.

Citation format and verification protocol for legal documents that draw on Bates-stamped source records. Defines the bracket citation format, multi-source citation rules, quotation handling, the verification pass that runs before output, and the [UNVERIFIED] flag protocol. Use this skill any time another skill produces a legal work product that cites Bates-stamped pages, including medical chronologies, deposition summaries, demand letters, case briefs, and discovery responses. Also use any time the user asks how to format a citation or verify that a claim is supported by the source.

Replace with a specific description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include keywords that help agents identify relevant tasks.

Creates structured surgical consultation responses with assessment and surgical candidacy determination. Use when responding to surgical consults, evaluating surgical candidates, or documenting surgical recommendations.

Creates structured operative notes with findings, technique, specimens, and estimated blood loss. Use when dictating operative reports, documenting surgical procedures, or recording intraoperative findings.

Creates IRB submission packages with protocol summaries, consent forms, and risk-benefit analysis. Use when submitting to IRB, preparing ethics applications, or writing consent documents.

Structures NIH/foundation grant applications with specific aims, significance, and innovation sections. Use when writing research grants, preparing NIH applications, or structuring grant proposals.

Generates structured admission order sets with diagnosis-specific protocols and safety checks. Use when admitting patients, creating admission orders, or setting up inpatient care plans.

Structures test validation with precision, accuracy, linearity, and reference range establishment. Use when validating new assays, documenting method comparisons, or establishing reference ranges.

Structures data quality assessment with completeness, accuracy, and consistency validation. Use when auditing clinical data, assessing data quality, or validating data integrity.