case-intake-initial-fact-memo
Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.
Best use case
case-intake-initial-fact-memo is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.
Teams using case-intake-initial-fact-memo should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/case-intake-initial-fact-memo/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How case-intake-initial-fact-memo Compares
| Feature / Agent | case-intake-initial-fact-memo | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Case Intake & Initial Fact Memo Produces an attorney work product memorandum capturing the initial consultation for a commercial litigation matter. Serves as the foundational document for case evaluation and strategy. ## Quick Start 1. Collect client intake info, key contracts, correspondence, financial records, and conflicts check results 2. Generate the memo using the section structure below 3. Mark every page **ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT – CONFIDENTIAL** 4. Use assigned case number or `Intake-[YYYY-MM-DD]` as identifier ## Prerequisites - **Client intake** — full legal entity name, formation state, principal contacts - **Key contracts** — executed agreements central to the dispute, with amendments - **Correspondence** — demand letters, emails, notices (chronological) - **Financial records** — invoices, payment records, damages calculations (if available) - **Conflicts check** — clearance confirmation and any waivers ## Memo Sections ### 1. Header Include: Matter/Case No., Date Prepared, Prepared By, Supervising Attorney, Client (full legal entity name), Subject line as `Initial Fact Memo: [Client] – [Dispute Type] – [Brief Description]`. ### 2. Client & Business Profile - Legal entity: name, type, formation state, principal place of business, registered agent - Key contacts: name, title, phone, email - Business context: industry, size, corporate structure - Referral source, prior representations, conflicts status ### 3. Case Overview 3–5 paragraph narrative covering: - Dispute type and party relationship - Legal objectives (recovery, injunction, declaratory relief) vs. business objectives (relationship preservation, reputation, deterrence) - Precipitating event and urgency drivers - Amount in controversy with source citation - Posture: claimant, defendant, or both *No liability conclusions — frame as facts and preliminary observations only.* ### 4. Chronology of Key Facts | Date | Event | Parties Involved | Source / Citation | |------|-------|-----------------|-------------------| - Use **direct quotations** when contract/correspondence language may be dispositive - Label every fact: `[Client Statement]`, `[Doc: filename, p. X]`, or `[Unverified]` - Flag timeline gaps, inconsistencies, and missing referenced materials ### 5. Key Parties | Party | Full Legal Name | Jurisdiction | Role | Status | |-------|----------------|--------------|------|--------| Include client, adverse parties, and third-party witnesses. ### 6. Contractual Framework For each material agreement, document: - Contract type, execution date, parties - Key obligations (cite § and quote verbatim) - Payment terms, notice/cure requirements, termination provisions - Dispute resolution clause (**quote verbatim** — arbitration or litigation) - Choice of law and forum selection (**quote verbatim** — mandatory or permissive) - Liquidated damages, liability caps, consequential damages exclusions (cite §) - Amendments and side letters (date and effect) ### 7. Preliminary Legal Issues & Claims **Potential claims (client as claimant):** | Claim | Elements | Supporting Facts (cite) | Apparent Strength | Likely Defenses | |-------|----------|------------------------|-------------------|-----------------| **Potential counterclaims / client exposure:** | Claim | Factual Basis | Preliminary Defenses | |-------|--------------|---------------------| **Threshold issues checklist:** - [ ] Statute of limitations: accrual date, governing period, expiration - [ ] Arbitration clause: mandatory? scope? waivable? - [ ] Forum selection: mandatory or permissive? - [ ] Choice of law conflicts with forum state? - [ ] Pre-suit notice/demand requirement (cite contract §) - [ ] Administrative exhaustion required? - [ ] Heightened pleading standard (e.g., fraud/particularity)? - [ ] Novel or unsettled legal questions requiring research ### 8. Damages & Relief **Monetary:** Direct damages, consequential/lost profits (methodology + assumptions), incidental, statutory/punitive (cite statute), attorneys' fees (contract/statute §). **Contractual modifiers:** Liquidated damages, liability caps, consequential exclusions — cite § for each. **Non-monetary:** Specific performance, injunction, declaratory judgment, rescission, accounting — state basis for inadequacy of legal remedies. **Business objectives beyond recovery:** Relationship preservation, confidentiality, precedent, competitive protection. ### 9. Procedural Posture & Deadlines | Item | Date / Status | Notes | |------|--------------|-------| Track: demand letters, litigation filings, arbitration demands, administrative proceedings, SOL deadlines, contractual notice deadlines, response deadlines, litigation hold status. ### 10. Document Inventory & Evidence Assessment | # | Document | Date | Author / Recipients | Relevance | Evidentiary Issues | |---|----------|------|--------------------|-----------|--------------------| - Extract critical quoted language verbatim with citations - List missing documents referenced but not produced - Flag privilege issues (attorney-client, work product) - Note metadata/forensic concerns (version history, track changes, send times) ### 11. Preliminary Strategic Assessment - **Strengths/weaknesses**: factual and legal, including gaps and credibility concerns - **Witness assessment**: availability, reliability, impeachment vulnerability - **Opposing party profile**: financial capacity, likely strategy, known counsel - **Leverage points**: business dependencies, reputational exposure, regulatory risk - **ADR viability**: negotiation/mediation/arbitration timing and client receptiveness - **Settlement posture**: client objectives and risk tolerance ### 12. Recommendations & Immediate Action Items | Priority | Action | Responsible | Deadline | Consequence of Delay | |----------|--------|-------------|----------|---------------------| Always include: 1. Litigation hold notice (immediate — spoliation risk) 2. File/respond deadline (SOL/waiver risk) 3. Additional document requests 4. Legal research on specific issues 5. Expert consultation needs Note **client decisions needed** (file vs. negotiate, preliminary injunction, fee arrangement) and **additional information needed** (documents, witnesses, factual clarifications). ### 13. Attachments Every document cited in the memo must appear in an attachment index or its absence explained. Organize by category: contracts, correspondence, financial records, corporate/organizational docs, administrative. ## Guidelines - **Source every fact**: `[Client Statement]`, `[Doc: name, p. X]`, or `[Unverified]` - **Quote, don't paraphrase** notice, arbitration, forum selection, and choice-of-law clauses — these control procedure - **No liability conclusions** in §§ 3–4; reserve legal assessment for § 7 with qualifiers (`preliminary analysis suggests`, `subject to further research`) - **Flag `[VERIFY]`** on any legal citation whose current validity is uncertain - **Work product designation** on every page - **US commercial litigation** scope — note state-specific procedural rules; flag choice-of-law conflicts ## Troubleshooting - **Missing contracts**: Flag in § 10 and add to § 12 action items as priority document request - **Conflicting client statements vs. documents**: Note discrepancy in § 4 chronology with both versions; flag for follow-up - **No case number assigned**: Use `Intake-[YYYY-MM-DD]` format throughout; update on assignment - **Uncertain legal citations**: Always append `[VERIFY]` — never present unconfirmed authority as settled law
Related Skills
managing-prosthodontic-cases
Structures prosthodontic evaluation with crown, bridge, and denture planning documentation. Use when planning prosthetic restorations, documenting impression techniques, or managing prosthetic treatment.
managing-oral-surgery-cases
Structures oral surgery documentation with extraction complexity assessment and complication management. Use when documenting extractions, assessing surgical complexity, or managing oral surgery complications.
managing-endodontic-cases
Guides root canal evaluation and treatment documentation with pulp/periapical diagnosis and outcome assessment. Use when evaluating endodontic cases, documenting root canal treatments, or assessing treatment outcomes.
sports-law-cases
Generates structured summaries of sports law cases covering contract disputes, doping violations, and governance controversies. Use when summarizing sports litigation, researching athlete contract disputes, anti-doping arbitration, league antitrust challenges, NCAA eligibility cases, or CAS proceedings.
space-law-case-summary
Generates structured summaries of space law cases involving satellite deployment, space debris, orbital conflicts, launch licensing, and international treaty disputes. Synthesizes the Outer Space Treaty, Liability Convention, U.S. Commercial Space Launch Act, FCC/FAA regulations, and ITAR/EAR export controls. Use when summarizing space law disputes, debris liability claims, orbital slot conflicts, or regulatory matters.
sentencing-memorandum
Drafts defense sentencing memoranda for federal and state criminal proceedings. Covers USSG guidelines analysis, § 3553(a) factors, mitigating evidence, alternative sentencing proposals, and restitution. Use when advocating for a favorable sentence after conviction or guilty plea.
private-placement-memorandum
Drafts U.S. Regulation D Private Placement Memoranda (PPMs) with required legends, risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, and subscription procedures. Trigger when drafting a PPM, preparing a Reg D (506(b) or 506(c)) offering, building accredited-investor disclosure, or structuring private placement documents to minimize 10b-5 liability.
private-placement-memo
Drafts a legally compliant Private Placement Memorandum for Regulation D offerings (Rule 506(b)/506(c)), covering full disclosure framework including risk factors, capitalization, securities terms, use of proceeds, and investor qualification requirements. Enforces SEC anti-fraud compliance under Section 10(b)/Rule 10b-5, blue sky law considerations, and accredited investor verification under Rule 501. Use this skill when drafting PPMs, offering memorandums, Reg D disclosure documents, or private offering circulars for issuers raising capital from sophisticated investors. Also trigger when the user mentions private placement disclosure, offering memorandum, Reg D fundraising, or accredited investor verification. Even if the user just says "PPM" or "draft our offering memo," use this skill.
pi-intake-form
Drafts a structured personal injury client intake form for initial consultations covering client identification, incident details, injury/treatment history, insurance, prior legal history, and authorizations. Supports conflict checking, case evaluation, and engagement setup. Use when onboarding a new PI client, creating intake questionnaires, or building pre-filing client records. Trigger keywords: personal injury intake, client onboarding, PI questionnaire, accident intake, injury claim intake.
maritime-case-summary
Produces structured summaries of maritime law cases covering admiralty jurisdiction, collisions, liens, salvage, cargo damage, charter parties, and personal injury aboard vessels. Extracts facts, legal issues, holdings, and practical implications using maritime-specific doctrines. Use when summarizing admiralty opinions, collision rulings, Jones Act claims, charter party disputes, or maritime lien enforcement.
litigation-case-strategy
Develops comprehensive litigation strategy across the full case lifecycle, from initial assessment through discovery, motion practice, trial preparation, and appeal. Produces case theory analysis, chronologies from document sets, discovery plans, deposition outlines, brief drafts, cross-examination questions, and appellate record summaries. Use when evaluating a new litigation matter, preparing case strategy memos, building case chronologies from emails or documents, preparing for depositions, drafting motions or briefs, developing trial strategy, or preparing appellate filings. Trigger keywords: litigation strategy, case assessment, case theory, case chronology, discovery plan, deposition prep, motion to dismiss, summary judgment, trial preparation, cross-examination, appellate brief, argument evaluation, case timeline.
intake-summary
Produces a structured U.S. corporate client intake summary from intake forms, consultation notes, and initial communications. Outputs an executive overview, client profile, matter description, timeline, legal considerations, financials, risks, and follow-up questions with source mapping. Use for corporate governance intake, new matter onboarding, and client management summaries. Trigger keywords: client intake summary, intake form, consultation notes, corporate governance, new matter overview.