class-claim-form

Drafts U.S. class action settlement claim forms compliant with FRCP 23 and court approval orders. Triggers on claim form drafting, settlement administrator packets, online claim workflows, or class member submission forms.

11 stars

Best use case

class-claim-form is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts U.S. class action settlement claim forms compliant with FRCP 23 and court approval orders. Triggers on claim form drafting, settlement administrator packets, online claim workflows, or class member submission forms.

Teams using class-claim-form should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/class-claim-form/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/class-claim-form/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/class-claim-form/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How class-claim-form Compares

Feature / Agentclass-claim-formStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts U.S. class action settlement claim forms compliant with FRCP 23 and court approval orders. Triggers on claim form drafting, settlement administrator packets, online claim workflows, or class member submission forms.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Class Member Claim Form

Produces a court-compliant claim form enabling class members to submit settlement claims with verifiable eligibility and documentation.

## Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

1. Preliminary or final approval order and settlement agreement
2. Case caption, court, judge, case number
3. Class definition and class period dates
4. Claim categories, eligibility criteria, payment formula/tiers
5. Submission deadline (date, time, time zone, postmark vs. receipt rule)
6. Settlement administrator contact (name, address, email, phone, portal URL)
7. Documentation requirements and no-doc thresholds
8. Privacy/data-retention policy; e-sign and accessibility requirements

## Workflow

1. **Header and deadline** — "Official Claim Form," exact case caption, court, case number, administrator contact, deadline with postmark/receipt rule.
2. **Eligibility summary** — Plain-language class definition referencing class period.
3. **Claimant identification** — Fields aligned to class definition (legal name during class period, current name if different, address, email, phone, alternate contact).
4. **Class criteria fields** — Purchase/transaction dates, account IDs, employment dates—tailored to class definition.
5. **Claim details** — Claim type checkboxes, dates, amounts, identifiers tied to compensation formula.
6. **Documentation** — List acceptable proof per claim type; state copies-vs-originals rule; note no-doc threshold if any.
7. **Certification and release** — Perjury attestation covering class membership, truthfulness, no duplicate payment. Separate release acknowledgment checkbox. Include state-specific waiver language if unknown claims are released (e.g., Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 — verify applicability).
8. **Signature** — Signature, printed name, date, representative relationship if applicable, e-sign acceptance statement.
9. **Submission instructions** — Mail, email, and portal options; confirmation process; contact info if no confirmation within stated period.
10. **Post-submission** — Review timeline, approval/denial notice, appeal or cure process.

## Required Notices

Every form must include:

- Submission does not guarantee payment
- Settlement subject to court approval/finality
- Attorneys' fees and costs may be deducted
- False statements may lead to denial and penalties
- Privacy and data-use disclosure
- ADA/accessibility and translation availability

## Documentation by Claim Type

| Type | Primary Proof | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase-based | Receipts, invoices, bank/card statements | Affidavit (if permitted) |
| Account-based | Account statements, confirmations | Admin verification |
| Employment-based | Pay stubs, HR records | Employer verification |

## Pitfalls and Checks

- Mirror settlement agreement definitions exactly — never invent eligibility criteria.
- Use plain language; define any legal terms.
- Align all language with court orders and class notice.
- Never promise payment or specific amounts unless the order mandates it.
- Require authority documents for estates, minors, or representatives.
- Avoid collecting SSNs; if court-ordered, request last four digits only.
- Ensure E-SIGN Act compliance for electronic submissions.
- For state-court class actions, adapt to the applicable state rule instead of FRCP 23.

---

Key changes from the original:

- **Description** tightened to a single sentence with clear trigger guidance
- **Removed** the verbose template skeleton — the 10-step workflow now carries the same structural guidance in compact form
- **Consolidated** the section checklist, field rules table, and documentation matrix into the workflow steps and a single lean documentation table
- **Merged** the required notices checklist into a simple bullet list (removed checkbox syntax)
- **Folded** release options guidance into workflow step 7
- **Kept** the pitfalls/guidelines section with all original legal guardrails intact

Related Skills

performing-quality-assurance-reviews

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures radiology peer review and quality assurance with discrepancy classification. Use when conducting peer review, classifying discrepancies, or documenting QA findings.

performing-image-guided-procedures

11
from CaseMark/skills

Documents image-guided biopsy, drainage, and injection procedures with technique and specimens. Use when performing IR procedures, documenting image-guided interventions, or recording procedural details.

performing-frozen-section-analysis

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides intraoperative frozen section evaluation with rapid diagnostic protocols and communication. Use when performing frozen sections, providing intraoperative diagnoses, or communicating preliminary results.

performing-emergency-procedures

11
from CaseMark/skills

Documents procedural indications, consent, technique, and complications for ED procedures. Use when performing emergency procedures, documenting procedural notes, or recording bedside procedures.

performing-autopsy-protocols

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures autopsy examination with organ system review, cause-of-death determination, and documentation. Use when performing autopsies, documenting autopsy findings, or determining cause of death.

managing-informed-consent-research

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures research consent documentation with required elements and vulnerable population protections. Use when creating research consents, managing consent processes, or documenting informed consent.

managing-informed-consent-compliance

11
from CaseMark/skills

Evaluates informed consent practices against state law requirements and institutional policies. Use when auditing consent processes, reviewing consent form adequacy, or managing consent compliance.

managing-clinical-imaging-informatics

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures radiology informatics workflows with PACS integration and DICOM standards. Use when managing imaging informatics, integrating PACS systems, or implementing DICOM workflows.

documenting-informed-consent

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures informed consent documentation with risks, benefits, alternatives, and patient understanding confirmation. Use when obtaining informed consent, documenting consent discussions, or verifying consent completeness.

conducting-false-claims-analysis

11
from CaseMark/skills

Evaluates billing practices for False Claims Act risk with qui tam and voluntary disclosure considerations. Use when assessing FCA risk, evaluating billing compliance, or considering self-disclosure.

classifying-imaging-findings

11
from CaseMark/skills

Applies standardized classification systems (BI-RADS, LI-RADS, TI-RADS, Lung-RADS, PI-RADS) to imaging findings. Use when categorizing imaging findings, applying RADS classifications, or determining follow-up recommendations.

calculating-performance-status

11
from CaseMark/skills

Documents ECOG and Karnofsky performance status with treatment eligibility implications. Use when assessing performance status, documenting ECOG scores, or evaluating treatment candidacy.