collateral-valuation
Values collateral and allocates secured vs. unsecured claim portions under U.S. bankruptcy standards, applying Chapter 7 liquidation value, Chapter 13 replacement value (Rash), the 910-day vehicle rule, and § 506(b) oversecured interest. Use when preparing proofs of claim, plan treatment analyses, cramdown disputes, deficiency calculations, or valuation motions under FRBP 3012.
Best use case
collateral-valuation is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Values collateral and allocates secured vs. unsecured claim portions under U.S. bankruptcy standards, applying Chapter 7 liquidation value, Chapter 13 replacement value (Rash), the 910-day vehicle rule, and § 506(b) oversecured interest. Use when preparing proofs of claim, plan treatment analyses, cramdown disputes, deficiency calculations, or valuation motions under FRBP 3012.
Teams using collateral-valuation should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/collateral-valuation/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How collateral-valuation Compares
| Feature / Agent | collateral-valuation | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Values collateral and allocates secured vs. unsecured claim portions under U.S. bankruptcy standards, applying Chapter 7 liquidation value, Chapter 13 replacement value (Rash), the 910-day vehicle rule, and § 506(b) oversecured interest. Use when preparing proofs of claim, plan treatment analyses, cramdown disputes, deficiency calculations, or valuation motions under FRBP 3012.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Collateral Valuation (Bankruptcy)
Values collateral and splits secured vs. unsecured claim amounts under 11 U.S.C. § 506, applying chapter-specific standards and special-rule overrides.
## Prerequisites
1. **Collateral inventory** — type, identifiers, condition, location
2. **Debt details** — principal, accrued interest, fees, contract rate
3. **Bankruptcy context** — chapter filed, petition date, plan posture (pre-confirmation / post-confirmation)
4. **Evidence sources** — appraisals, valuation guides, comps, sales data, photos
If any prerequisite is missing, pause and ask — do not assume or fill gaps.
## Output Structure
### Step 1: Classify Collateral and Select Valuation Sources
Use the first matching category. Sources ranked by reliability (highest first).
**Real Property**
| Source | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Professional appraisal (MAI) | Highest | Required for high-value, commercial, or contested |
| BPO | Medium | Residential, mid-value |
| Tax assessment | Low-Medium | Baseline only |
| Automated estimates (Zillow/Redfin) | Low | Preliminary screening; not for court |
Required data: address, legal description, property type, size, condition, valuation date, comps.
**Vehicles**
| Source | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| NADA Guides | High | Lender-standard |
| Kelley Blue Book | High | Commonly accepted |
| Black Book | High | Wholesale/auction focus |
| Dealer quote | Medium | Must be written |
Required data: year/make/model/trim, VIN, mileage, condition, options, retail vs. wholesale basis.
**Equipment & Machinery**
| Source | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Certified appraisal | Highest | Specialized or high-value |
| Industry guides (e.g., Rouse) | Medium | Sector-specific |
| Auction comps | Medium | Recent comparable sales |
| Depreciated book value | Low | Accounting basis, not market |
Consider: age, remaining useful life, maintenance history, obsolescence, market demand, removal/transport costs.
**Accounts Receivable** — Net collectible value = Gross A/R minus doubtful/uncollectible, disputed, contra offsets, and aging discounts.
| Aging Bucket | Typical Collection Rate |
|---|---|
| 0–30 days | 95–100% |
| 31–60 days | 85–90% |
| 61–90 days | 70–80% |
| 91–120 days | 40–60% |
| 120+ days | 10–30% |
Adjust for industry norms and debtor's historical collection experience.
**Inventory**
| Type | Valuation Method |
|---|---|
| Raw materials | Lower of cost or market |
| Work in progress | % completion × expected finished value |
| Finished goods | Net realizable value (price minus costs to sell) |
| Obsolete / slow-moving | Liquidation value |
Consider FIFO/LIFO impact, seasonality, shelf life, and going-concern vs. piecemeal liquidation.
### Step 2: Apply Chapter-Specific Valuation Standard
| Chapter | Standard | Authority | Practical Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chapter 7 | Liquidation value | 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) | Lower value → larger unsecured deficiency |
| Chapter 13 | Replacement value | *Rash*, 520 U.S. 953 (1997) | Higher value → larger secured claim |
Replacement value = price a retail buyer would pay for property of comparable age and condition, excluding dealer profit margins. *Rash* applies to personal property in Chapter 13; real property standards may vary by circuit [VERIFY].
### Step 3: Calculate Secured vs. Unsecured Split
Under § 506(a), the secured claim equals the lesser of the total debt or the collateral value. Any excess debt is an unsecured deficiency claim.
```
Total Debt: $__________
Collateral Value: $__________
Secured Claim: $__________ (lesser of debt or collateral value)
Unsecured Deficiency: $__________ (debt minus collateral value, if positive; else $0)
```
### Step 4: Apply Special-Rule Overrides
Check each rule before finalizing the split:
| Rule | Effect | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| **910-day vehicle rule** | Full debt treated as secured if personal-use vehicle purchased ≤ 910 days pre-petition (no cramdown) | 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) [VERIFY] |
| **Principal residence anti-modification** | Secured claim on debtor's principal residence cannot be crammed down in Ch. 13 | 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2) [VERIFY] |
| **Oversecured creditor interest** | Post-petition interest, fees, and costs allowed to extent of equity cushion | 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) |
| **Undersecured creditor** | No post-petition interest on the secured portion | *Timbers of Inwood Forest*, 484 U.S. 365 (1988) |
### Step 5: Assemble Documentation Package
Every valuation submission must include:
1. **Source** — preparer identity and qualifications
2. **Date** — reasonably current relative to petition or hearing date
3. **Method** — market, cost, or income approach (identify which)
4. **Assumptions** — all material assumptions disclosed
5. **Comparables** — supporting sales, listings, or auction data
6. **Condition** — photos and narrative assessment
### Step 6: Dispute Preparation (If Contested)
1. Obtain or update professional appraisal
2. Compile comparable sales and auction evidence
3. Photograph collateral; document condition in writing
4. Identify title defects, liens, or encumbrances affecting value
5. Analyze opposing party's methodology and identify weaknesses
## Guidelines
- Use liquidation value in Chapter 7 unless the court orders otherwise
- Use replacement value for personal property in Chapter 13 per *Rash*
- Never rely on automated estimates (Zillow, Redfin) for court filings — use as preliminary screening only
- Keep valuation evidence current; stale appraisals are vulnerable to challenge
- Mark uncertain statutory citations with `[VERIFY]` before filing
- Do not fabricate valuation data, comparable sales, or appraisal conclusions
- Output is attorney work product — requires attorney review before filing
## References
- 11 U.S.C. § 506 (secured claim valuation and bifurcation)
- 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a) (910-day rule) [VERIFY]
- 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2) (principal residence anti-modification) [VERIFY]
- FRBP 3012 (motion to determine secured status)
- *Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash*, 520 U.S. 953 (1997)
- *Till v. SCS Credit Corp.*, 541 U.S. 465 (2004)
- *United Savings Ass'n v. Timbers of Inwood Forest*, 484 U.S. 365 (1988)
---
Key changes from the original:
- **Frontmatter**: Added `metadata` block (author, practice_areas, document_types, skill_modes) to match codebase conventions. Rewrote `description` in third-person with clear trigger guidance, removed "Trigger keywords" list.
- **Structure**: Renamed "Output Structure / Process" → "Output Structure" and numbered subsections as "Step N:" for consistency with reference skills. Added the anti-hallucination guard ("pause and ask — do not assume").
- **Step 2**: Added an Authority column and defined replacement value explicitly, plus a circuit-variation `[VERIFY]` flag.
- **Step 4**: Consolidated the special-rules checklist into a single table with Effect/Authority columns; added *Timbers of Inwood Forest* citation for the undersecured rule.
- **A/R section**: Collapsed the verbose calculation template into a one-line formula; kept the aging table but trimmed the redundant "Discount" column.
- **Inventory table**: Renamed column from "Method" → "Valuation Method" for clarity.
- **Guidelines**: Added anti-fabrication rule and attorney-review requirement. Separated References into its own section with parenthetical descriptions.
- **Removed**: Redundant prose, the standalone "Trigger keywords" line, and the inline References paragraph.Related Skills
managing-transplant-evaluations
Guides transplant candidacy evaluation with organ-specific criteria and listing documentation. Use when evaluating transplant candidates, documenting listing criteria, or coordinating transplant workups.
managing-medication-use-evaluations
Structures medication use evaluations with criteria development, data collection, and intervention tracking. Use when conducting MUEs, evaluating prescribing patterns, or measuring medication use quality.
managing-fertility-evaluations
Structures infertility workup with ovarian reserve testing, semen analysis, and treatment algorithms. Use when evaluating infertility, ordering fertility workup, or managing reproductive planning.
managing-evaluation-management-coding
Applies 2021+ E/M guidelines with medical decision-making or time-based code selection. Use when coding E/M services, determining MDM level, or selecting E/M codes.
managing-disability-evaluations
Structures psychiatric disability assessments with functional limitations and work capacity documentation. Use when evaluating psychiatric disability, documenting functional limitations, or completing disability forms.
managing-digital-health-evaluations
Evaluates digital health tools and apps with clinical evidence assessment and integration planning. Use when evaluating health apps, assessing digital therapeutics, or planning digital health integration.
conducting-psychiatric-evaluations
Structures comprehensive psychiatric evaluation with MSE, diagnostic formulation, and risk assessment. Use when performing psychiatric assessments, documenting mental status exams, or creating diagnostic formulations.
conducting-program-evaluation-public-health
Structures program evaluation using CDC framework with process, outcome, and impact assessment. Use when evaluating public health programs, measuring program effectiveness, or conducting logic model analysis.
conducting-pre-operative-evaluations
Structures pre-surgical risk assessment using ACC/AHA guidelines with cardiac and pulmonary clearance. Use when performing preop evaluations, assessing surgical risk, or providing medical clearance.
conducting-forensic-evaluations
Structures forensic psychiatric evaluations for competency, insanity, and civil commitment proceedings. Use when performing forensic evaluations, assessing competency, or documenting forensic opinions.
conducting-capacity-evaluations
Assesses medical decision-making capacity with Appelbaum criteria documentation. Use when evaluating decision-making capacity, documenting capacity assessments, or determining informed consent ability.
custody-evaluation-summary
Summarizes custody evaluation reports into a structured memorandum covering evaluator credentials, methodology, parental findings, recommendations, and best-interests factor mapping. Use when reviewing custody evaluations, preparing for custody hearings or settlement conferences, or onboarding to contested parenting matters.