conducting-buy-side-due-diligence

Structures comprehensive buy-side diligence across financial, legal, commercial, and operational workstreams. Use when coordinating DD processes, building diligence checklists, or synthesizing DD findings.

11 stars

Best use case

conducting-buy-side-due-diligence is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Structures comprehensive buy-side diligence across financial, legal, commercial, and operational workstreams. Use when coordinating DD processes, building diligence checklists, or synthesizing DD findings.

Teams using conducting-buy-side-due-diligence should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/conducting-buy-side-due-diligence/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/capital/conducting-buy-side-due-diligence/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/conducting-buy-side-due-diligence/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How conducting-buy-side-due-diligence Compares

Feature / Agentconducting-buy-side-due-diligenceStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Structures comprehensive buy-side diligence across financial, legal, commercial, and operational workstreams. Use when coordinating DD processes, building diligence checklists, or synthesizing DD findings.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Conducting Buy Side Due Diligence

Structures comprehensive buy-side diligence across financial, legal, commercial, and operational workstreams. Use when coordinating DD processes, building diligence checklists, or synthesizing DD findings for an acquirer or investor.

## When To Use

- Buyer or investor is evaluating a target company for acquisition, merger, or significant investment
- Corporate development team needs a structured DD checklist across multiple workstreams
- Deal team needs to synthesize findings from parallel workstreams into a consolidated diligence memo
- Advisor is preparing a diligence request list (DRL) to send to the sell-side
- Post-LOI / post-term-sheet phase where the data room is open or about to open

## Inputs To Gather

- **Deal parameters**: Target name, industry, transaction type (asset vs. stock purchase, merger, minority investment), indicative valuation, and deal timeline
- **Information Memorandum / CIM**: Sell-side marketing materials describing the target's business, financials, and growth story
- **Data room access or index**: VDR table of contents or document inventory to assess completeness
- **Prior diligence reports**: Any Phase I or preliminary findings from Red Flag reviews
- **Buyer's investment thesis**: Strategic rationale, synergy assumptions, integration priorities
- **Known risk areas**: Regulatory exposure, pending litigation, customer concentration, IP dependencies

## Workflow

### 1. Define Scope and Workstream Ownership

- Identify required DD workstreams based on deal type and target profile:
  - **Financial DD**: Quality of earnings (QoE), working capital analysis, debt/debt-like items, normalized EBITDA adjustments
  - **Legal DD**: Corporate organization, material contracts, litigation, regulatory compliance, IP ownership
  - **Commercial DD**: Market sizing, competitive positioning, customer cohort analysis, pipeline durability
  - **Operational DD**: Technology stack, supply chain, workforce composition, facility/lease obligations
  - **Tax DD**: Tax attributes, exposure analysis, structuring considerations [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific tax treatment]
  - **Environmental DD**: Phase I/II ESA status, remediation liabilities, permit compliance [VERIFY applicable environmental regulations]
  - **Insurance DD**: Policy adequacy, claims history, tail coverage requirements
- Assign workstream leads and set reporting cadence (typically weekly syncs with a consolidated tracker)

### 2. Build the Diligence Request List (DRL)

- Draft workstream-specific request lists with numbered items for VDR cross-referencing
- Prioritize Tier 1 (deal-critical) vs. Tier 2 (confirmatory) requests
- Include time-period specifications (e.g., "3 most recent fiscal years plus YTD interim period")
- Flag items requiring management presentations or expert sessions (e.g., technology deep-dive, customer reference calls)

### 3. Execute Workstream Reviews

- **Financial**: Reconcile CIM financials to audited statements; identify QoE adjustments (one-time items, pro forma run-rate expenses, related-party transactions); calculate locked-box or completion accounts working capital peg; map debt/debt-like items for enterprise-to-equity bridge
- **Legal**: Review articles of incorporation and bylaws; abstract material contracts for change-of-control provisions, assignment restrictions, and termination triggers; catalog pending or threatened litigation with exposure estimates; confirm IP ownership chain and freedom to operate [VERIFY specific IP registrations and encumbrances]
- **Commercial**: Validate revenue by customer, product, and geography; assess customer concentration (top 10/20 customers as % of revenue); evaluate contract renewal rates, weighted average contract life, and churn; pressure-test management's growth projections against independent market data
- **Operational**: Assess key-person dependencies; review technology architecture for scalability and technical debt; evaluate supplier concentration and single-source risks; confirm real property lease terms and capital expenditure requirements

### 4. Identify and Escalate Red Flags

- Maintain a running red-flag log with severity ratings (High / Medium / Low)
- High-severity triggers: material litigation undisclosed, revenue recognition irregularities, unrecorded liabilities, change-of-control consent failures, regulatory non-compliance
- Escalate high-severity items immediately to deal lead and legal counsel — do not wait for the final report

### 5. Synthesize Findings into DD Report

- Consolidate workstream summaries into a structured diligence memo:
  - Executive summary with go/no-go recommendation and key conditions
  - Workstream-by-workstream findings with supporting evidence references (VDR document numbers)
  - Quantified impact table: identified adjustments to enterprise value, working capital, or earn-out targets
  - Risk matrix mapping identified issues to proposed mitigations (reps & warranties, indemnities, escrow/holdback, purchase price adjustments, closing conditions)
  - Open items list with owners and deadlines

## Output

- **Diligence Request List (DRL)**: Numbered, workstream-organized document request schedule
- **Consolidated DD Report**: Executive summary, workstream findings, financial adjustments, risk matrix, and open items
- **Red Flag Memo** (if applicable): Standalone escalation document for deal-critical issues
- **Purchase Agreement Markup Inputs**: Specific rep & warranty requests, indemnity carve-outs, and disclosure schedule items informed by DD findings

## Quality Checks

- Every material finding cites a specific VDR document or management representation — no unsourced assertions
- Financial adjustments tie to audited financials or QoE schedules with clear bridging logic
- Risk severity ratings are consistent across workstreams (same rubric applied)
- Open items are assigned, dated, and tracked — none left as "TBD" without an owner
- Confirm all Tier 1 DRL items were received and reviewed; flag any seller non-responses
- [VERIFY] Regulatory and tax conclusions reflect the governing jurisdiction and current law
- [VERIFY] Change-of-control and consent requirements checked against the specific transaction structure (asset vs. stock)
- Final report reviewed by deal lead before distribution to investment committee or board

Related Skills

We are still matching the closest adjacent skills for this page. In the meantime, continue through the full directory.