conducting-credit-committee-presentations
Structures credit committee packages with borrower analysis, risk assessment, structuring proposal, and recommendation documentation. Use when preparing credit committee materials, presenting loan opportunities, or documenting credit decisions.
Best use case
conducting-credit-committee-presentations is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Structures credit committee packages with borrower analysis, risk assessment, structuring proposal, and recommendation documentation. Use when preparing credit committee materials, presenting loan opportunities, or documenting credit decisions.
Teams using conducting-credit-committee-presentations should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/conducting-credit-committee-presentations/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How conducting-credit-committee-presentations Compares
| Feature / Agent | conducting-credit-committee-presentations | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Structures credit committee packages with borrower analysis, risk assessment, structuring proposal, and recommendation documentation. Use when preparing credit committee materials, presenting loan opportunities, or documenting credit decisions.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Conducting Credit Committee Presentations Structures credit committee packages with borrower analysis, risk assessment, structuring proposal, and recommendation documentation. ## When To Use - Preparing a new deal for credit committee approval (direct lending, leveraged loan, or syndicated facility) - Updating an existing credit for annual review, amendment, or waiver request - Documenting the committee's decision rationale for audit and regulatory files - Presenting a workout, restructuring, or watchlist escalation to the committee ## Inputs To Gather - **Borrower financials**: Audited and interim statements, quality-of-earnings adjustments, management projections - **Deal terms**: Term sheet or commitment letter, pricing grid, covenants, maturity, amortization schedule - **Industry data**: Sector overview, peer comps, relevant market benchmarks (e.g., LCD/Pitchbook leveraged lending stats) - **Collateral / security package**: Asset appraisals, lien priority, guarantor analysis - **Third-party reports**: Appraisals, environmental, insurance certificates, legal due diligence memos - **Internal risk rating**: Proposed rating with scorecard inputs, migration history if existing borrower - **Sponsor / management background**: Track record, key-person risk, ownership structure ## Workflow 1. **Build the Executive Summary** - One-page overview: borrower name, industry, transaction type (new money / refinancing / amendment), requested facility size, and clear recommendation (approve / approve with conditions / decline). - State the investment thesis in 2–3 sentences: why this credit fits the portfolio mandate. 2. **Draft the Borrower & Industry Analysis** - Company overview: business model, revenue mix, customer concentration, competitive positioning. - Historical financial performance (3–5 years): revenue, EBITDA, margins, capex, free cash flow. - Industry dynamics: cyclicality, regulatory exposure, secular trends. [VERIFY sector-specific risk factors against current market conditions] 3. **Present the Financial Model & Projections** - Base, upside, and downside cases with key assumptions stated explicitly. - Credit metrics at each scenario: Total Debt / EBITDA, Senior Secured / EBITDA, Interest Coverage, Fixed Charge Coverage, Debt / Total Capitalization. - Sensitivity tables on revenue decline, margin compression, and interest rate changes. 4. **Detail the Proposed Structure** - Facility breakdown: tranches, sizes, pricing (spread + floor), OID, maturity, amortization. - Covenant package: financial maintenance covenants (leverage, coverage) with proposed levels and cushion analysis; incurrence covenants and key negative covenant baskets. - Security and guaranty package, including intercreditor considerations for multi-tranche deals. - Fees: commitment, unused, agency, prepayment penalties. 5. **Assess Key Risks & Mitigants** - Enumerate top 5–7 risks (industry, operational, financial, structural, sponsor, legal/regulatory). - For each risk, state the specific mitigant or structural protection. - Include downside recovery analysis: estimated enterprise value at stress, coverage of secured debt. 6. **Assign Internal Risk Rating** - Apply the institution's rating methodology; show scorecard inputs and outputs. - Compare to external ratings if available (Moody's, S&P, Fitch). [VERIFY rating methodology aligns with current internal policy] - Note any overrides or qualitative adjustments with justification. 7. **State the Recommendation & Conditions** - Clear approve / conditional approve / decline recommendation. - List all conditions precedent to closing (legal opinions, insurance, environmental sign-off, KYC completion). - Specify any portfolio-level considerations: hold size vs. target, industry concentration limits, single-obligor limits. [VERIFY against current portfolio limits and concentration policy] 8. **Compile Appendices** - Detailed financial statements and spreads - Organizational chart and ownership structure - Comparable transaction / comp table - Draft term sheet or markup summary - Covenant compliance projections over the facility life ## Output A complete credit committee package containing: - **Executive summary** (1 page) with clear recommendation - **Borrower & industry analysis** (2–4 pages) - **Financial model summary** with scenario analysis and sensitivity tables - **Structuring memo** covering terms, covenants, and security - **Risk matrix** mapping each identified risk to its mitigant - **Internal risk rating worksheet** - **Appendices** with supporting data and documentation Format the package to match the institution's standard credit memo template. Use consistent units ($ in millions unless otherwise noted), and label all EBITDA figures as to whether they are reported, adjusted, or pro forma. ## Quality Checks - [ ] Every financial metric ties back to the sourced financial statements or QoE report - [ ] Base, upside, and downside scenarios use clearly stated and differentiated assumptions - [ ] Covenant cushion analysis shows headroom at each projection period under the base case - [ ] Risk section addresses at minimum: industry, leverage, cash flow, collateral, and sponsor/management risk - [ ] Internal risk rating is calculated per current policy with any overrides documented - [ ] Hold size and concentration are checked against portfolio limits [VERIFY current limits] - [ ] All [VERIFY] items have been resolved or flagged for committee discussion - [ ] No inferred data is presented as confirmed — assumptions are labeled explicitly
Related Skills
triaging-emergency-presentations
Applies ESI triage methodology to assign acuity levels based on presenting complaints, vital signs, and resource needs. Use when triaging ED patients, assigning acuity scores, or prioritizing emergency cases.
managing-accreditation-compliance
Tracks Joint Commission/HFAP/DNV accreditation standards compliance with survey preparation. Use when preparing for accreditation, tracking standards compliance, or managing survey readiness.
documenting-tumor-board-presentations
Structures multidisciplinary tumor board case presentations with radiology, pathology, and treatment synthesis. Use when preparing tumor board cases, presenting MDT discussions, or documenting consensus recommendations.
conducting-surgical-time-outs
Structures WHO surgical safety checklist completion with sign-in, time-out, and sign-out documentation. Use when performing surgical time-outs, completing safety checklists, or documenting pre-incision verification.
conducting-stress-test-interpretation
Interprets exercise and pharmacologic stress tests with Duke treadmill score and nuclear findings. Use when reading stress tests, interpreting nuclear perfusion, or documenting exercise tolerance.
conducting-stark-law-analysis
Evaluates physician self-referral arrangements against Stark Law exceptions with documentation. Use when analyzing Stark compliance, evaluating referral arrangements, or documenting exception applicability.
conducting-psychiatric-evaluations
Structures comprehensive psychiatric evaluation with MSE, diagnostic formulation, and risk assessment. Use when performing psychiatric assessments, documenting mental status exams, or creating diagnostic formulations.
conducting-program-evaluation-public-health
Structures program evaluation using CDC framework with process, outcome, and impact assessment. Use when evaluating public health programs, measuring program effectiveness, or conducting logic model analysis.
conducting-preoperative-planning
Structures surgical planning with imaging review, risk stratification, and equipment/team requirements. Use when planning surgeries, reviewing preoperative imaging, or coordinating surgical teams.
conducting-pre-operative-evaluations
Structures pre-surgical risk assessment using ACC/AHA guidelines with cardiac and pulmonary clearance. Use when performing preop evaluations, assessing surgical risk, or providing medical clearance.
conducting-nursing-assessments
Structures head-to-toe nursing assessments with system-by-system documentation and abnormal findings. Use when performing nursing assessments, documenting patient evaluations, or creating assessment narratives.
conducting-mortality-reviews
Structures mortality case reviews with root cause analysis and system improvement recommendations. Use when conducting M&M reviews, analyzing adverse outcomes, or documenting mortality cases.