conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis
Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.
Best use case
conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.
Teams using conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis Compares
| Feature / Agent | conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Conducting Liquidity And Viability Analysis ## When To Use - Building or reviewing a 13-week cash flow (TWCF) model for a distressed company - Evaluating whether a business can fund operations through a restructuring timeline - Assessing liquidity runway to determine filing urgency or need for DIP financing - Identifying critical vendors whose non-payment would trigger operational shutdown - Supporting going-concern opinions, lender negotiations, or board-level solvency decisions ## Inputs To Gather - **Bank statements and cash ledger** — trailing 13 weeks minimum; 26 weeks preferred for seasonality - **A/R aging schedule** — with collection history and concentration by customer - **A/P aging schedule** — including past-due balances and vendor payment terms - **Revolver/ABL borrowing base certificate** — current availability, reserves, and eligibility criteria - **Debt service schedule** — principal, interest, fees, and covenant compliance dates - **Payroll registers** — by pay period, including taxes, benefits, and contractor payments - **Capital expenditure commitments** — contractual and discretionary, with deferral feasibility - **Intercompany funding flows** — if multi-entity, map cash pooling and restricted subsidiaries - **Material contracts list** — leases, supply agreements, and any minimum purchase obligations ## Workflow 1. **Establish the cash baseline** - Reconcile opening cash across all accounts (operating, restricted, escrow) - Identify trapped cash in foreign subsidiaries or restricted accounts - Confirm revolver availability net of reserves, letters of credit, and borrowing base limits 2. **Build the 13-week cash flow model** - Use a direct-method (receipts and disbursements) format — not indirect/accrual - Week 1–2: populate from known scheduled payments and confirmed receivables - Weeks 3–6: use rolling historical conversion rates for A/R and A/P - Weeks 7–13: apply trend-based or management-forecast assumptions with clear labels - Segregate operating cash flow from restructuring-related professional fees and costs - Model revolver draws/repayments dynamically based on weekly net cash position 3. **Stress-test and scenario the model** - **Base case**: management forecast with historical adjustment - **Downside case**: 10–20% revenue haircut, accelerated payables, delayed collections - **Liquidity crisis case**: loss of top customer or key supplier, revolver freeze - Identify the week where each scenario breaches minimum cash or triggers covenant default 4. **Perform critical vendor analysis** - Classify vendors into tiers: (1) sole-source/operational necessity, (2) important but substitutable, (3) discretionary - For Tier 1 vendors, assess: lead time for alternatives, contractual cure periods, lien exposure - Estimate the cost of vendor defection (production stoppage, lost revenue, substitute pricing) - Flag vendors with cross-default or setoff rights against receivables 5. **Assess going-concern viability** - Calculate liquidity runway in weeks under each scenario - Determine if the company can fund: (a) ordinary operations, (b) restructuring costs, (c) adequate protection payments simultaneously - Evaluate whether a consensual out-of-court process is feasible or if a filing is required to access DIP financing, the automatic stay, or Section 363 sale process [VERIFY — jurisdiction-specific filing considerations and local rules] - Identify specific triggers that would move the timeline forward (e.g., vendor acceleration, lender sweep, covenant breach date) 6. **Document assumptions and sensitivities** - Create an assumptions page listing every conversion rate, growth factor, and timing assumption - Flag which assumptions have the highest cash impact if wrong (tornado chart or sensitivity table) - Note all data gaps and their estimated materiality ## Output - **13-Week Cash Flow Model** — weekly receipts and disbursements with beginning/ending cash, revolver balance, and minimum liquidity line - **Scenario Summary Table** — side-by-side comparison of base, downside, and crisis cases showing the week liquidity is exhausted - **Critical Vendor Matrix** — tiered vendor list with sole-source flags, estimated switching cost, and recommended payment priority - **Liquidity Runway Assessment** — narrative memo stating weeks of runway under each scenario, key triggers, and recommended next steps (e.g., engage DIP lenders, prepare first-day motions, negotiate forbearance) - **Assumptions and Sensitivity Log** — tabular list of all model inputs with source, confidence level, and cash impact range ## Quality Checks - Confirm the TWCF beginning cash ties to the most recent bank statement — zero tolerance for unexplained variances - Verify that total 13-week disbursements are cross-checked against trailing actuals (±10% variance requires explanation) - Ensure revolver mechanics reflect actual credit agreement terms (borrowing base formula, reserves, dominion triggers) [VERIFY — confirm against executed credit agreement] - Validate that critical vendor tier assignments have been reviewed against supply chain and operations teams — not solely from financial data - Check that the downside scenario assumptions are genuinely adverse, not a marginal trim of the base case - Confirm professional fee estimates reflect actual engagement letters and anticipated restructuring scope - Flag any week where minimum operating cash falls below a two-week payroll coverage threshold