contract-analysis
Analyzes contracts to identify key terms, obligations, risks, and negotiation opportunities. Produces structured risk assessments with executive summary, provision review, risk matrix, and prioritized recommendations. Use when reviewing agreements before execution, during negotiation, at closing, or for compliance monitoring.
Best use case
contract-analysis is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Analyzes contracts to identify key terms, obligations, risks, and negotiation opportunities. Produces structured risk assessments with executive summary, provision review, risk matrix, and prioritized recommendations. Use when reviewing agreements before execution, during negotiation, at closing, or for compliance monitoring.
Teams using contract-analysis should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/contract-analysis/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How contract-analysis Compares
| Feature / Agent | contract-analysis | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Analyzes contracts to identify key terms, obligations, risks, and negotiation opportunities. Produces structured risk assessments with executive summary, provision review, risk matrix, and prioritized recommendations. Use when reviewing agreements before execution, during negotiation, at closing, or for compliance monitoring.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Contract Analysis Extracts and evaluates material provisions, risk allocations, and obligations across one or more contracts to support negotiation, execution, or remediation decisions. ## Prerequisites Before starting, collect: 1. **Contract document(s)** — executed or draft; note which 2. **Client role** — which party the analysis favors (or neutral) 3. **Jurisdiction** — governing law if known; flag if absent 4. **Scope** — full review, specific provisions, or multi-contract comparison ## Workflow ### 1. Executive Summary - Parties, effective date, term, governing law (1–2 sentences each) - Top 3–5 critical risks requiring immediate attention - Overall favorability: favorable / balanced / unfavorable ### 2. Key Provisions Matrix For each provision, record section number, summary, risk level (High/Med/Low), and notes. Provisions to evaluate: - **Term & Termination** — cure periods, notice, convenience rights - **Payment Terms** — timing, late fees, set-off rights - **Scope / Deliverables** — ambiguity, change-order mechanics - **Indemnification** — mutual vs. one-sided, carve-outs - **Limitation of Liability** — cap amount, excluded damages - **Warranty / Disclaimer** — express vs. implied, remedy limits - **Insurance** — required types, minimums - **IP Ownership** — work-for-hire, license-back, background IP - **Confidentiality** — term, carve-outs, residuals clause - **Dispute Resolution** — arb vs. litigation, venue, fee-shifting - **Auto-Renewal** — notice window, opt-out mechanics - **Assignment / Change of Control** — consent requirements - **Force Majeure** — scope, notice, extended FM termination right - **Governing Law / Venue** ### 3. Risk Matrix For each issue found, record section, severity, likelihood, and recommended action. Risk categories: - **Ambiguity** — language supporting multiple interpretations - **Asymmetry** — one-sided obligations or liability allocation - **Gaps** — material matters left unaddressed - **Conflicts** — internal inconsistencies between sections - **Unenforceability** — provisions likely void under applicable law ### 4. Comparative Analysis *(multi-contract only)* Table comparing key terms across agreements; flag deviations from market standard. ### 5. Prioritized Recommendations Rank issues by priority (Critical → High → Moderate) with provision reference, issue description, and proposed fix for each. ## Checks - Cite exact section numbers and quote key language verbatim - Flag auto-renewal clauses with short opt-out windows as high-priority regardless of other factors - Note all cross-references to external documents, exhibits, or incorporated standards — treat as additional obligations - For ambiguous provisions, state the full range of plausible interpretations and implications - Mark `[VERIFY]` on any statutory or case citations — do not assess enforceability under specific state law without verifying current precedent - UCC Article 2 applies to goods; common law governs services — note if contract mixes both without specifying - Flag non-compete, non-solicit, and liquidated damages clauses for separate enforceability review under applicable state law