corporate-compliance-checklist
Drafts a U.S. corporate compliance program checklist anchored in DOJ ECCP, Federal Sentencing Guidelines Chapter 8, and SEC enforcement priorities. Covers governance, risk assessment, training, monitoring, reporting, domain-specific obligations, documentation, and phased implementation. Use when building, evaluating, or strengthening a compliance program, preparing for regulatory inquiry, or conducting annual program assessments.
Best use case
corporate-compliance-checklist is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts a U.S. corporate compliance program checklist anchored in DOJ ECCP, Federal Sentencing Guidelines Chapter 8, and SEC enforcement priorities. Covers governance, risk assessment, training, monitoring, reporting, domain-specific obligations, documentation, and phased implementation. Use when building, evaluating, or strengthening a compliance program, preparing for regulatory inquiry, or conducting annual program assessments.
Teams using corporate-compliance-checklist should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/corporate-compliance-checklist/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How corporate-compliance-checklist Compares
| Feature / Agent | corporate-compliance-checklist | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts a U.S. corporate compliance program checklist anchored in DOJ ECCP, Federal Sentencing Guidelines Chapter 8, and SEC enforcement priorities. Covers governance, risk assessment, training, monitoring, reporting, domain-specific obligations, documentation, and phased implementation. Use when building, evaluating, or strengthening a compliance program, preparing for regulatory inquiry, or conducting annual program assessments.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Corporate Compliance Checklist Generates an assessment-ready compliance program checklist grounded in DOJ ECCP, FSG Chapter 8, and SEC frameworks, covering all major program pillars from board oversight through domain-specific controls. ## Prerequisites 1. Company name, industry sector, and primary business activities 2. Organizational structure (public/private, size, geographic footprint) 3. Regulatory profile (industry-specific regulators, prior enforcement history) 4. Existing compliance materials, audit findings, or regulatory correspondence (if any) 5. Compliance domains to prioritize (or confirm full-spectrum coverage) ## Quick Start Generate a professionally formatted checklist using ☐ checkboxes grouped under bold subheadings. Reference DOJ ECCP and FSG Chapter 8 explicitly in the preamble. Tailor domain-specific sections to the company's actual regulatory profile — not all domains apply equally. ## Checklist Sections ### 1. Governance & Oversight **Board/Committee** | Element | Standard | |---|---| | Board compliance oversight charter | Caremark duties (In re Caremark Int'l, Del. Ch. 1996) | | Audit/compliance committee with direct CCO access | FSG §8B2.1(b)(2) | | Board-level compliance reporting (≥ quarterly) | DOJ ECCP §I | | Board training on red flags and regulatory trends | DOJ ECCP §I | **Chief Compliance Officer** — must have: organizational independence from revenue functions, direct CEO/board reporting line, adequate budget/staffing/authority, documented mandate and delegation matrix. **Policy Framework** — each policy requires approval authority, effective date, version control, distribution log, employee acknowledgment, and review cycle (≤ 3 years): | Policy | Key Requirements | |---|---| | Code of Conduct | Values, escalation paths, annual certification | | Anti-Corruption / Anti-Bribery | FCPA compliance, foreign official interactions | | Gift & Entertainment | Monetary thresholds, pre-approval for government officials | | Conflict of Interest | Disclosure form, recusal process, committee review | | Insider Trading | Trading windows, pre-clearance, MNPI handling | | Related Party Transactions | Arm's-length standard, board approval thresholds | | Whistleblower / Non-Retaliation | SOX §301, Dodd-Frank §922 requirements | ### 2. Compliance Risk Assessment - Annual enterprise-wide assessment (refresh on: M&A, new markets, new regulations, significant incidents) - Inherent vs. residual risk scoring (likelihood × impact) - Risk inventory by business unit, product line, geography, function - Third-party risk tiering with enhanced due diligence for high-risk vendors/agents - Methodology documented and board-reported Frameworks: COSO ERM (2017), ISO 31000, DOJ ECCP §II. ### 3. Training & Culture | Audience | Content | Frequency | |---|---|---| | Board | Oversight duties, regulatory trends, red flags | Annual | | Executives | Tone-from-top, accountability, culture indicators | Annual | | All employees | Code of conduct, reporting channels, key policies | Annual + onboarding | | High-risk roles | Role-specific scenarios (FCPA, SOX, antitrust, FLSA) | Annual + role-change | Track: completion records with timestamps, assessment scores (defined passing threshold), records retained ≥ 7 years. Culture indicators: helpline utilization, anonymous vs. identified report ratio, assessment pass rates, policy acknowledgment rate (target: 100%). ### 4. Monitoring, Testing & Audit **Continuous** — automated transaction monitoring, expense analytics, vendor screening (sanctions/adverse media), quarterly access reviews, policy exception tracking. **Periodic** — annual compliance audit, targeted high-risk audits, transaction sampling, control effectiveness testing, remediation follow-up within agreed timelines. **Independence** — internal audit reports to audit committee (not management), testing independent from business units under review, work papers per IIA Standards. ### 5. Reporting & Investigations **Channels** (SOX §301 / Dodd-Frank §922): third-party anonymous hotline (24/7, multilingual), web reporting portal, compliance officer intake, direct audit committee channel. **Investigation protocol:** 1. Intake → triage within 5 business days 2. Assign investigator (expertise + independence) 3. Issue litigation hold if legal exposure identified 4. Document: interview notes, evidence log, timeline, findings memo 5. Remediation plan with owner and deadline 6. Closed-loop reporter notification (where permissible) **Escalation triggers** (immediate CCO/GC/Board): potential criminal conduct, self-disclosure considerations, C-suite/board involvement, material financial impact. **Anti-retaliation** — track employment actions on reporters (12-month lookback), follow-up at 60/120 days, zero-tolerance with disciplinary matrix. ### 6. Domain-Specific Compliance Include only domains relevant to the company's regulatory profile. **Employment** — FLSA classification/overtime, Title VII/ADA/ADEA policies and training, OSHA hazard programs (Form 300), FMLA/state leave, FCRA background checks, contractor classification (IRS 20-factor; state ABC tests). **Data Privacy & Cybersecurity** — CCPA/CPRA, VCDPA, CPA + applicable state laws; privacy notice and consumer rights workflows; data minimization and retention; vendor DPAs; breach notification (state matrix, 30–72 hours); HIPAA/GLBA/GDPR where applicable; NIST CSF or equivalent. **Financial Controls** — SOX §302/§404 (disclosure controls, ICFR); segregation of duties; revenue recognition (ASC 606); financial close procedures; anti-fraud program (ACFE framework). **Contracts & Procurement** — review thresholds/approval matrix, standard templates, vendor due diligence, government contract compliance (FAR/DFARS), obligation tracking. **Environmental** — permit inventory/calendar, CAA/CWA/RCRA/TSCA, SPCC/emergency response, state overlay, annual audit. **Antitrust** — HSR filing thresholds [VERIFY current amount], competitor interaction policy (no price-fixing/market allocation/bid-rigging), resale price maintenance guardrails, trade association pre-clearance, annual sales/marketing training. ### 7. Documentation & Recordkeeping | Record Type | Retention | |---|---| | Compliance policies (all versions) | Perpetual | | Training completion records | 7 years | | Audit work papers | 7 years (SOX) | | Investigation files | Statute of limitations + 3 years | | Risk assessments | 7 years | | Board/committee compliance minutes | Perpetual | | Employment records | 3–7 years (varies by law) | | Environmental permits/monitoring | Permit duration + 5 years | Litigation hold procedures tested annually. Privileged materials clearly marked; sensitive investigations under counsel direction. Centralized system with access controls and audit trail. ### 8. Implementation Roadmap **Phase 1 — Assessment (0–60 days):** Gap analysis, risk assessment, executive/board commitment and budget. **Phase 2 — Foundation (60–180 days):** Appoint CCO, draft Code of Conduct and priority policies, launch hotline and investigation procedures, deploy initial training. **Phase 3 — Expansion (180–365 days):** Full training rollout, monitoring system configuration, first annual audit, metrics dashboard operational. **Phase 4 — Optimization (ongoing):** Annual DOJ ECCP self-assessment (well-designed? earnestly applied? works in practice?), peer benchmarking, regulatory monitoring (DOJ, SEC, FTC, DOL, EPA, state AGs). **KPIs** | Leading | Lagging | |---|---| | Training completion (target: 100%) | Violations/incidents count | | Policy acknowledgment rate | Regulatory findings/citations | | Hotline utilization | Audit deficiencies | | Risk assessment coverage (% of BUs) | Investigation cycle time | | Third-party due diligence completion | Repeat findings rate | ## Guidelines - Reference DOJ ECCP and FSG Chapter 8 explicitly as the primary evaluative frameworks - Privilege: recommend sensitive investigation work under attorney direction - Self-disclosure requires separate legal analysis — flag but do not resolve - Verify HSR thresholds and state privacy law applicability at time of use [VERIFY] - SOX §302/§404 is non-negotiable for public companies; note private analogues where useful - GDPR applies only if company processes EU resident data — confirm before including ## Troubleshooting **Unclear regulatory profile:** Start with governance, risk assessment, and reporting sections. Add domain-specific sections as regulatory exposure is confirmed. **Company spans multiple jurisdictions:** Build a jurisdiction matrix first. Layer state/local requirements onto the federal baseline per domain. **Existing program assessment vs. new build:** For assessments, use the checklist as a gap analysis tool — score each item as implemented/partial/missing. For new builds, follow the phased roadmap in Section 8. **Privilege concerns with investigation documentation:** Flag that all investigation work product should be created at counsel's direction and clearly marked as privileged. Do not draft investigation protocols that waive privilege.
Related Skills
managing-telehealth-compliance
Evaluates telehealth program compliance with state licensing, prescribing, and reimbursement requirements. Use when assessing telehealth compliance, reviewing licensure requirements, or managing virtual care regulations.
managing-state-regulatory-compliance
Monitors state-specific healthcare regulatory requirements including licensing, reporting, and scope of practice. Use when tracking state regulations, managing licensure requirements, or monitoring regulatory changes.
managing-research-compliance
Monitors research compliance with federal regulations (21 CFR, 45 CFR 46) and institutional policies. Use when ensuring research compliance, managing regulatory requirements, or conducting compliance reviews.
managing-medical-records-compliance
Evaluates medical records practices against retention, access, and amendment requirements. Use when auditing medical records, managing record retention, or processing amendment requests.
managing-informed-consent-compliance
Evaluates informed consent practices against state law requirements and institutional policies. Use when auditing consent processes, reviewing consent form adequacy, or managing consent compliance.
managing-emtala-compliance
Evaluates emergency department practices against EMTALA requirements with documentation checklists. Use when assessing EMTALA compliance, reviewing MSE requirements, or documenting transfer obligations.
managing-compliance-programs
Structures OIG-model compliance program elements with effectiveness measurement and reporting. Use when building compliance programs, implementing OIG guidance, or measuring program effectiveness.
managing-compliance-audits
Structures coding compliance audit programs with sampling methodology and corrective action plans. Use when conducting compliance audits, designing audit samples, or implementing corrective actions.
managing-clinical-trial-compliance
Evaluates clinical trial regulatory compliance with FDA/IRB requirements and audit readiness. Use when auditing trial compliance, preparing for FDA inspections, or managing regulatory requirements.
managing-billing-compliance
Structures billing compliance programs with audit methodology and corrective action protocols. Use when auditing billing practices, managing compliance programs, or implementing corrective actions.
managing-accreditation-compliance
Tracks Joint Commission/HFAP/DNV accreditation standards compliance with survey preparation. Use when preparing for accreditation, tracking standards compliance, or managing survey readiness.
auditing-hipaa-compliance
Conducts HIPAA compliance assessments with Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification analysis. Use when auditing HIPAA compliance, assessing privacy practices, or reviewing security controls.