demand-package-compilation

Compiles pre-suit and settlement demand packages for U.S. commercial litigation plaintiff matters. Assembles demand letter with chronological facts, liability theories, itemized damages, and indexed exhibits. Use when drafting pre-filing demand packages, settlement demand letters with exhibit bundles, or structured pre-litigation claim presentations.

11 stars

Best use case

demand-package-compilation is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Compiles pre-suit and settlement demand packages for U.S. commercial litigation plaintiff matters. Assembles demand letter with chronological facts, liability theories, itemized damages, and indexed exhibits. Use when drafting pre-filing demand packages, settlement demand letters with exhibit bundles, or structured pre-litigation claim presentations.

Teams using demand-package-compilation should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/demand-package-compilation/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/demand-package-compilation/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/demand-package-compilation/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How demand-package-compilation Compares

Feature / Agentdemand-package-compilationStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Compiles pre-suit and settlement demand packages for U.S. commercial litigation plaintiff matters. Assembles demand letter with chronological facts, liability theories, itemized damages, and indexed exhibits. Use when drafting pre-filing demand packages, settlement demand letters with exhibit bundles, or structured pre-litigation claim presentations.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Demand Package Compilation

Assembles a litigation-ready demand package — cover letter, demand letter, and indexed exhibits — for settlement negotiation.

## Prerequisites

1. **Case facts** — incident/breach narrative, dates, party names and roles
2. **Damages documentation** — medical bills, invoices, wage records, repair estimates
3. **Evidence inventory** — photos/video, witness statements, expert reports, contracts, correspondence
4. **Legal theories** — duties breached, applicable statutes or common law claims
5. **Demand figure** — client-approved amount with response deadline

## Quick Start

Collect all five prerequisites, then draft the package in order: cover letter, demand letter (with exhibit references woven into the fact narrative), damages table, and exhibit index. Cross-check every exhibit reference before finalizing.

## Package Structure

### 1. Cover Letter

Brief transmittal identifying matter, parties, and purpose.

### 2. Demand Letter

| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Introduction | Client identity, adverse party, basis for claim |
| Statement of Facts | Chronological narrative with exhibit references (Ex. 1, Ex. 2…) |
| Legal Theories | Duty, breach, causation, damages — one paragraph per theory |
| Damages Summary | Itemized table with total demand figure |
| Liability Analysis | Why liability is clear; preempt key weaknesses |
| Demand & Deadline | Dollar amount; response deadline (typically 30 days) |

### 3. Damages Table

| Category | Subcategory | Amount | Exhibit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic | Past medical expenses | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Future medical expenses | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Past lost wages | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Future earning capacity | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Property damage / repairs | $ | Ex. __ |
| Economic | Out-of-pocket expenses | $ | Ex. __ |
| Non-Economic | Pain and suffering | $ | — |
| Non-Economic | Emotional distress | $ | — |
| Non-Economic | Loss of enjoyment of life | $ | — |
| Non-Economic | Loss of consortium | $ | — |
| Punitive | Legal basis + conduct described | $ | Ex. __ |
| **TOTAL DEMAND** | | **$** | |

### 4. Exhibit Index

Number exhibits sequentially mirroring demand letter narrative. Typical groupings:

- Incident documentation (reports, scene photos)
- Medical records and billing
- Employment and wage loss records
- Property damage estimates and invoices
- Photographic / video evidence
- Witness statements and affidavits
- Expert reports
- Contracts and agreements
- Correspondence
- Legal authority (statutes, key cases)

## Pre-Finalization Checklist

- [ ] Every exhibit reference in the letter matches an included, labeled exhibit
- [ ] Every factual assertion backed by an exhibit
- [ ] Damages figures cross-referenced to source documents
- [ ] Dates, names, party designations consistent throughout
- [ ] Total demand and response deadline stated clearly
- [ ] No attorney work product or privileged communications included
- [ ] HIPAA: written patient authorization confirmed before transmitting medical records
- [ ] Sensitive PII redacted where not essential
- [ ] Package paginated, bookmarked (PDF), and exhibit-indexed

## Common Pitfalls

- **Privilege leak** — The package becomes opposing counsel's property upon transmission. Exclude all attorney-client communications and work product.
- **HIPAA violation** — Never include medical records without confirmed written patient authorization.
- **Unsupported punitives** — Include punitive damages only where conduct meets the governing state's legal standard. Verify jurisdiction-specific threshold and pleading requirements.
- **Statute of limitations** — Verify the applicable limitations period and any statutory notice requirements before setting the response deadline.
- **Incomplete package** — The package must be self-contained. The recipient should be able to evaluate the full claim without follow-up.
- **Tone** — Professional and factual. Let evidence carry persuasive weight; avoid inflammatory language.

---

**Key changes made:**

- **Removed `tags`** — not part of the Agent Skills spec frontmatter
- **Trimmed description** — tightened wording while keeping all trigger keywords
- **Added Quick Start** section per best practices structure
- **Consolidated Exhibit Index** — replaced verbose table (with placeholder ranges) with a compact bullet list
- **Renamed "Guidelines" to "Common Pitfalls"** — reframed as actionable failure modes instead of passive guidance
- **Merged jurisdiction/tone/HIPAA/privilege rules** into the pitfalls section to eliminate duplication with the checklist
- **Reduced line count** from 92 to ~82 while preserving all domain-critical content (damages table, demand letter structure, checklist, compliance guardrails)

Related Skills

We are still matching the closest adjacent skills for this page. In the meantime, continue through the full directory.