deposition-analysis
Produces litigation-grade U.S. deposition summaries with exact page-line citations, topical organization, and strategic analysis of admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Use when asked for deposition summaries, page-line or P&L citations, depo analysis, impeachment review, cross-exam prep, or motion-support summaries.
Best use case
deposition-analysis is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Produces litigation-grade U.S. deposition summaries with exact page-line citations, topical organization, and strategic analysis of admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Use when asked for deposition summaries, page-line or P&L citations, depo analysis, impeachment review, cross-exam prep, or motion-support summaries.
Teams using deposition-analysis should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/deposition-analysis/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How deposition-analysis Compares
| Feature / Agent | deposition-analysis | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Produces litigation-grade U.S. deposition summaries with exact page-line citations, topical organization, and strategic analysis of admissions, inconsistencies, objections, and exhibits. Use when asked for deposition summaries, page-line or P&L citations, depo analysis, impeachment review, cross-exam prep, or motion-support summaries.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Deposition Analysis Generates citation-accurate, topic-organized deposition summaries with strategic analysis for discovery and trial preparation. Assumes U.S. deposition conventions unless another jurisdiction is specified. ## Quick Start 1. Obtain transcript with page/line numbering, witness metadata, and any exhibit list. 2. Validate completeness — confirm pagination, line numbering, witness identity, date, errata; flag gaps. 3. Extract testimony, objections, exhibit references, and procedural notations with exact cites. 4. Organize by case issues and produce the required sections below. ## Citation Format All citations use: `Page X, Lines Y-Z` Every substantive statement, objection, and exhibit reference must carry a cite. If uncertain about a cite, acknowledge uncertainty — never guess. ## Required Sections | Section | Content | |---|---| | Case Overview | Witness role, subject matter, key issues | | Chronology | Dates, sequences, timeline conflicts with cites | | Topical Summaries | Testimony organized by issue with cites | | Admissions | Claim/defense-supporting statements with cites | | Inconsistencies/Evasions | Conflicts, shifts, non-responsive answers with cites | | Objections Log | Topic, ground, response/ruling, page-line | | Exhibits Log | Exhibit ID, description, related testimony, page-line | | Open Follow-Ups | Missing docs, unclear testimony, recommended next steps | ## Core Workflow ``` - [ ] Validate transcript completeness and metadata - [ ] Extract and index all substantive testimony with page-line cites - [ ] Build topical sections aligned to pleadings and case themes - [ ] Identify admissions, inconsistencies, evasions, and credibility issues - [ ] Cross-reference timeline statements for internal conflicts - [ ] Compile objections and exhibits logs - [ ] Verify every citation against source transcript - [ ] Flag open follow-ups and investigation gaps ``` ## Post-Delivery Response Modes | Request | Output | Rule | |---|---|---| | Factual retrieval | Quote/paraphrase with cites | Include all locations if testimony repeated | | Comparative | Side-by-side statements with cites | Explain evolution or contradiction | | Evaluative | Evidence inventory with cites | No legal conclusions; note ambiguity | ## Pitfalls - **Omitting unfavorable testimony.** Include both helpful and harmful statements — never filter by side. - **Meaning-altering paraphrase.** Preserve qualifying language; do not strip hedges or conditions. - **Fabricated citations.** Verify every cite. State what is missing rather than approximating. - **Legal conclusions.** Provide evidence and cite it — do not offer strategic advice or legal opinions. - **Confidentiality.** Respect protective-order constraints and confidentiality designations. - **Editorializing.** Keep tone formal and litigation-ready throughout.