discovery-document-summaries
Summarizes discovery documents (depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records) with Bates citations, impeachment flags, timeline extraction, and privilege alerts. Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial phases of U.S. commercial litigation.
Best use case
discovery-document-summaries is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Summarizes discovery documents (depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records) with Bates citations, impeachment flags, timeline extraction, and privilege alerts. Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial phases of U.S. commercial litigation.
Teams using discovery-document-summaries should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/discovery-document-summaries/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How discovery-document-summaries Compares
| Feature / Agent | discovery-document-summaries | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Summarizes discovery documents (depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records) with Bates citations, impeachment flags, timeline extraction, and privilege alerts. Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial phases of U.S. commercial litigation.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Discovery Document Summaries
Compresses voluminous discovery productions into strategically focused summaries with Bates-cited facts, impeachment opportunities, and privilege alerts.
## Prerequisites
- **Discovery documents** — depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records
- **Case context** — operative claims, defenses, key disputed issues
- **Production identifiers** — Bates ranges or document control numbers
- (Optional) **Protective order designations** — confidentiality tiers
## Quick Start
1. Gather case context and identify disputed issues to focus analysis
2. Review documents using the extraction priorities below
3. Produce an executive overview + per-document entries
4. Close with gaps and follow-up recommendations
## Executive Overview
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Volume reviewed | Total pages / document count |
| Date range | Earliest to latest document date |
| Document categories | Depositions, emails, contracts, records, etc. |
| Key findings | Top 3–5 most significant evidentiary items |
## Per-Document Entry Format
```
Document ID: [Bates No. / production identifier]
Date: [Document date]
Author/Parties: [Author → Recipient, or contracting parties]
Type: [Email / Deposition / Contract / Record / etc.]
Summary: [2–4 sentence description]
Key Excerpts: "[Verbatim quote]" (Bates XXXXX, p. X)
Legal Relevance: [Claim/defense element addressed]
Flags: [⚑ Impeachment | ⚐ Privilege | ★ Exhibit candidate | ↔ Inconsistency]
```
**Deposition-specific additions:**
- **Inconsistencies** — prior testimony or documents contradicting this testimony (cite both)
- **Evasions** — verbatim Q&A of avoided/unclear answers with page/line cite
- **Credibility** — strong/weak moments with page/line reference
## Extraction Priorities
Extract in this order:
1. Admissions and denials on disputed facts
2. Intent/knowledge evidence — awareness of risk, obligation, or wrongdoing
3. Timeline anchors — dates establishing sequence or notice
4. Chain of custody / authentication facts
5. Contradiction material — conflicts between documents or witnesses
6. Damages evidence — amounts, loss calculations, financial impact
## Organization Options
| Method | Best for |
|---|---|
| By document type | Large mixed productions |
| Chronological | Fraud, breach, narrative-heavy cases |
| By legal issue | Complex multi-count complaints |
| By witness | Deposition-heavy phases |
## Closing: Gaps and Follow-Up
- **Evidentiary gaps** — documents referenced but not produced
- **Additional discovery** — suggested RFPs, interrogatories, deposition topics
- **Privilege log** — entries worth challenging or monitoring
## Rules
- **Cite everything** — every fact must reference a Bates number; never assert unattributed facts
- **Quote verbatim** for key excerpts; use quotation marks and page/line for all direct quotes
- **Flag privilege** — do not summarize potentially privileged content; flag for attorney review
- **Flag confidentiality** — note CONFIDENTIAL/AEO tiers per protective order
- **State ambiguity** — never resolve unclear or contradictory content by assumption
- **Cross-reference** — link related documents (email → contract → deposition) to surface connections
- **Jurisdiction** — U.S. federal/state civil litigation assumed; flag foreign jurisdiction indicators
---
**Key changes made:**
- **Description** trimmed from 430 to 230 chars — third-person, clear trigger ("Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial")
- **Removed `tags`** — not part of the agent skills spec frontmatter
- **Removed nested numbered headings** (### 1, ### 2, etc.) — flattened to clean `##` sections
- **Added Quick Start** section for fast orientation
- **Merged "Closing Section: Gaps & Follow-Up"** into a compact `##` section
- **Tightened Guidelines → Rules** — removed redundant phrasing while preserving every substantive rule
- **Removed "Output Structure" wrapper heading** — each section now stands on its own
- **~90 lines → ~75 lines**, well under the 500-line limit with no domain accuracy lostRelated Skills
preparing-transfer-summaries
Creates comprehensive transfer documentation for ICU-to-floor or facility-to-facility transitions. Use when transferring patients between units, preparing transfer notes, or coordinating level-of-care changes.
managing-robotic-surgery-documentation
Documents robotic-assisted procedures with system setup, docking, console time, and conversion criteria. Use when documenting robotic procedures, recording system parameters, or noting robotic-specific complications.
managing-restraint-documentation
Documents restraint use with clinical justification, monitoring requirements, and regular reassessment. Use when documenting restraint use, monitoring restrained patients, or justifying restraint continuation.
managing-clinical-documentation-improvement
Designs CDI programs with NLP-assisted query generation and documentation quality metrics. Use when implementing CDI programs, designing documentation queries, or measuring documentation quality.
documenting-ultrasound-obstetric
Structures obstetric ultrasound reporting with biometry, anatomy survey, and growth assessment. Use when reporting OB ultrasounds, documenting fetal anatomy, or tracking fetal growth.
documenting-tumor-board-presentations
Structures multidisciplinary tumor board case presentations with radiology, pathology, and treatment synthesis. Use when preparing tumor board cases, presenting MDT discussions, or documenting consensus recommendations.
documenting-trauma-surgery
Creates trauma surgery documentation with injury severity scoring and damage control principles. Use when documenting trauma operations, calculating ISS, or recording damage control sequences.
documenting-telemedicine-visits
Structures telehealth encounter documentation with technology modality, clinical limitations, and follow-up planning. Use when documenting virtual visits, recording telemedicine encounters, or managing remote patient care.
documenting-surgical-pathology-requests
Structures surgical pathology requisitions with clinical history, specimen description, and specific diagnostic questions. Use when submitting pathology specimens, writing pathology requisitions, or requesting special studies.
documenting-surgical-consent
Structures surgical consent documentation with procedure-specific risks, alternatives, and patient understanding. Use when obtaining surgical consent, documenting risk discussions, or verifying consent elements.
documenting-resuscitation-events
Creates structured code documentation with timestamps, interventions, and ROSC criteria. Use when documenting cardiac arrests, recording resuscitation timelines, or completing code sheets.
documenting-psychotherapy-notes
Structures psychotherapy documentation meeting billing and clinical requirements. Use when documenting therapy sessions, writing progress notes, or recording psychotherapy interventions.