incident-response-playbook

Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident response, playbook, data breach, ransomware, cybersecurity policy, NIST 800-61.

11 stars

Best use case

incident-response-playbook is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident response, playbook, data breach, ransomware, cybersecurity policy, NIST 800-61.

Teams using incident-response-playbook should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/incident-response-playbook/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/incident-response-playbook/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/incident-response-playbook/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How incident-response-playbook Compares

Feature / Agentincident-response-playbookStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts incident response plans and scenario playbooks for U.S. legal organizations, aligning NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 phases with ABA Model Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6 and privilege preservation. Use when creating or updating an incident response plan, breach response policy, ransomware playbook, or regulatory notification checklist. Trigger keywords: incident response, playbook, data breach, ransomware, cybersecurity policy, NIST 800-61.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Incident Response Plan and Playbook

Produces defensible, operational incident response plans and scenario playbooks for legal organizations. Aligns NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 with ABA ethics obligations and client confidentiality requirements.

## Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

1. **Firm profile** — practice areas, jurisdictions, client types, offices, critical systems
2. **Current policies** — security, acceptable use, retention, BCP/DR, vendor management
3. **Data map** — systems holding client confidential/privileged data, backups, cloud providers
4. **Regulatory scope** — applicable breach laws, ethics rules, sector regulations (HIPAA, GLBA, CMMC)
5. **Contacts** — internal response team and external vendors with after-hours channels

## Quick Start

1. Confirm scope and standards (NIST 800-61, ABA Rules 1.1/1.4/1.6, state bar guidance)
2. Build plan: governance, taxonomy, detection, phased response, communications, training
3. Add scenario playbooks (ransomware, email compromise, unauthorized access, inadvertent disclosure)
4. Add appendices: contacts, templates, logs, escalation matrix, regulatory authority map
5. Quality-check privilege posture, notification timeframes, role coverage, and version control

## Core Workflow

### 1. Plan Header and Governance

**Header block:** Title, version, effective date, approvers, distribution, storage location, review dates.

**Governance roles** — each needs primary duties, decision authority, and named backups:
- Incident Response Coordinator (activate, triage, oversee)
- Legal/Ethics Counsel (privilege, ethics, notifications, regulators)
- IT/Security Lead (forensics, containment, eradication)
- Managing Partner/ED (resourcing, client impact, business decisions)
- Comms Lead (internal/external messaging)
- Practice Leaders (client context, matter impact — advisory)

**External engagement checklist:**
- [ ] Forensics firm on retainer or pre-approved
- [ ] Breach counsel on retainer
- [ ] Cyber insurer notification triggers defined
- [ ] Law enforcement engagement criteria defined
- [ ] PR firm engagement criteria defined

### 2. Incident Taxonomy

**Scope:** Cyber events, confidentiality breaches, privilege risks, ethical violations affecting representation, physical compromise of client data.

**Severity levels:**

| Severity | Examples | Response | Notification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Widespread client data exposure, ransomware on active matters, privilege compromise | Immediate activation + exec notify | Immediate |
| High | Targeted account takeover, multi-matter access | Activate response team | Within 2 hrs |
| Medium | Single-user phishing, limited exposure | IT + counsel review | Same business day |
| Low | Blocked attempts, policy violations | Log + monitor | Standard queue |

### 3. Detection and Reporting

**Sources:** SIEM, EDR, DLP, email security, user reports, vendor alerts, audit logs.

**Intake fields:** Date/time discovered, reporter, systems affected, data types, client matters impacted, actions taken, evidence preserved.

**Privilege protocol:** Counsel directs investigations. Mark communications "Privileged & Confidential." Separate factual incident log from legal analysis.

### 4. NIST-Aligned Phased Response

**Preparation:**
- [ ] Security controls baseline documented
- [ ] Annual training and phishing simulations
- [ ] Tabletop exercises conducted
- [ ] Vendor/insurer contacts verified
- [ ] Backup restoration tested

**Identification:**
- [ ] Validate incident
- [ ] Scope systems/data
- [ ] Classify severity
- [ ] Determine client/privilege impact

**Containment:**
- [ ] Short-term isolation
- [ ] Account resets and access control
- [ ] Long-term containment plan

**Eradication:**
- [ ] Remove malware
- [ ] Patch vulnerabilities
- [ ] Confirm adversary ejected

**Recovery:**
- [ ] Restore from clean backups
- [ ] Validate integrity
- [ ] Resume operations with monitoring

**Lessons Learned:**
- [ ] Post-incident review within 14 days
- [ ] Update plan and controls
- [ ] Capture metrics (MTTD, MTTC, MTTR, notification compliance)

### 5. Scenario Playbooks

**Ransomware:**
- [ ] Isolate affected systems
- [ ] Notify insurer and breach counsel
- [ ] Assess exfiltration indicators
- [ ] Evaluate restore options and legal posture
- [ ] Law enforcement decision

**Email Account Compromise:**
- [ ] Reset credentials and tokens
- [ ] Review mailbox rules and sent items
- [ ] Identify affected client communications
- [ ] Client notification if required
- [ ] Harden MFA and mail security

**Unauthorized Case File Access:**
- [ ] Identify matters and data types
- [ ] Assess privilege impact
- [ ] Client notification determination
- [ ] Access control remediation

**Inadvertent Privilege Disclosure:**
- [ ] Notify receiving party
- [ ] Demand return/destruction
- [ ] Document inadvertence
- [ ] Evaluate waiver risks

### 6. Communications and Notifications

**Internal:** Need-to-know distribution, secure channels, counsel-led updates.

**Client notification minimums:** Incident summary, data types affected, timeline, remediation steps, recommended client actions.

**Regulatory notification matrix** — populate per jurisdiction:

| Jurisdiction | Statute/Rule | Trigger | Deadline | Agency | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [State] | [Citation] | [Trigger] | [X days] | [AG/Agency] | [VERIFY] |

**Ethics obligations:** ABA Rules 1.4 (communication), 1.6 (confidentiality), 1.1 (tech competence).

### 7. Appendices

Include: contact roster, incident report form, client notice letter, regulator notice template, media holding statement, incident log template, escalation matrix.

**Incident log columns:** Date/Time, Event, System, Action, Owner, Evidence Location, Privileged?

## Pitfalls

- **Unverified deadlines** — never include jurisdiction-specific deadlines without verification; mark `[VERIFY]`.
- **Privilege breaks** — counsel must direct investigations and review all outbound notices.
- **Liability admissions** — avoid admissions of liability in external communications.
- **Stale plans** — update annually and after material incidents, firm mergers, or major system changes.
- **Missing citations** — always cite NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 and applicable ethics rules; reference local bar guidance when used.

---

**Key changes from the original:**

- **Removed `tags` from frontmatter** — not part of the Agent Skills spec (only `name` and `description`)
- **Tightened description** — kept under 1024 chars, third-person, clear trigger guidance
- **Added Quick Start section** — the 5-step overview now lives in its own scannable section
- **Flattened "Output Structure / Process"** — eliminated the redundant dual-layer (summary + numbered subsections) by merging into a single "Core Workflow" with flat numbered steps
- **Removed code fence around incident log template** — replaced with inline column listing
- **Consolidated Training/Testing/Metrics** — folded into the Lessons Learned checklist and Appendices rather than a standalone section (saves ~20 lines)
- **Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls"** — matches the best-practices pattern and uses bold-label + dash format for quick scanning
- **Reduced from 201 to ~145 lines** — well under the 500-line limit, with no loss of domain accuracy or legal intent

Related Skills

tracking-treatment-response

11
from CaseMark/skills

Monitors treatment response using imaging criteria, biomarkers, and clinical assessment with documentation. Use when assessing treatment response, documenting disease status, or tracking progression.

tracking-incidental-findings

11
from CaseMark/skills

Manages incidental finding follow-up using ACR White Paper recommendations. Use when tracking incidentalomas, scheduling follow-up imaging, or managing unexpected findings.

measuring-tumor-response

11
from CaseMark/skills

Applies RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria for tumor measurement and treatment response assessment. Use when measuring tumor response, applying RECIST criteria, or documenting treatment effects.

managing-rapid-response-nursing

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures rapid response team activation criteria and nursing documentation during rapid response events. Use when activating rapid response, documenting RRT events, or recognizing deterioration.

managing-privacy-breach-response

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides HIPAA breach investigation with risk assessment, notification requirements, and remediation documentation. Use when managing data breaches, assessing breach risk, or documenting breach response.

managing-pandemic-response

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures pandemic response planning with surge capacity, resource allocation, and communication protocols. Use when planning pandemic response, managing surge operations, or coordinating emergency health responses.

rfp-response

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts evaluation-ready U.S. federal RFP responses across all standard proposal volumes (cover letter, technical, cost/price, reps and certs). Enforces FAR compliance, CPARS references, and Section L/M alignment. Use when preparing federal solicitation submissions, responding to government RFPs, or drafting procurement bids.

nov-response

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts formal responses to governmental Notices of Violation, covering acknowledgment, factual timeline, legal defenses, mitigation, and proposed corrective action. Use when responding to environmental enforcement actions, regulatory citations, compliance violations, or governmental NOVs from agencies including EPA, OSHA, state environmental departments, or local code enforcement.

interrogatory-response-summaries

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of interrogatory responses in commercial litigation, extracting key facts, objections, evasions, patterns, and inconsistencies per interrogatory. Use when analyzing opposing party interrogatory answers, spotting discovery gaps, or preparing for depositions.

incident-to-billing-policy

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts Medicare incident-to billing compliance policies for healthcare practices. Covers eligibility criteria, direct supervision, documentation standards, audit programs, and FCA risk mitigation under 42 CFR 410.26, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual Ch. 15 §60.1, and 42 U.S.C. §1395x(s)(2)(A). Use when creating or updating incident-to policies, responding to OIG scrutiny, or establishing NPP billing compliance programs.

incident-response-plan

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts incident response plans and playbooks for legal organizations, adapting NIST SP 800-61 to law firm contexts including privilege preservation, ethics obligations, and state breach notification compliance. Use when creating IR plans, cybersecurity playbooks, breach response policies, or data incident procedures for law firms or legal departments.

incident-report-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured, litigation-ready summaries from police reports, crash reports, workplace incident reports, or investigative documents. Extracts parties, narratives, citations, witnesses, contributing factors, and visual documentation into a standardized format. Use when summarizing an incident report for case assessment, discovery planning, or liability evaluation; trigger keywords: police report, accident report, crash report, incident summary, report summary, investigative report.