informed-consent-form-clinical-trial
Drafts an IRB-ready Informed Consent Form (ICF) for FDA-regulated clinical trials compliant with 21 CFR 50.25, 50.27, and ICH-GCP. Use when drafting or revising consent documents for Phase I–IV trials, IND studies, or other FDA-regulated protocols requiring IRB submission.
Best use case
informed-consent-form-clinical-trial is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts an IRB-ready Informed Consent Form (ICF) for FDA-regulated clinical trials compliant with 21 CFR 50.25, 50.27, and ICH-GCP. Use when drafting or revising consent documents for Phase I–IV trials, IND studies, or other FDA-regulated protocols requiring IRB submission.
Teams using informed-consent-form-clinical-trial should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/informed-consent-form-clinical-trial/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How informed-consent-form-clinical-trial Compares
| Feature / Agent | informed-consent-form-clinical-trial | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts an IRB-ready Informed Consent Form (ICF) for FDA-regulated clinical trials compliant with 21 CFR 50.25, 50.27, and ICH-GCP. Use when drafting or revising consent documents for Phase I–IV trials, IND studies, or other FDA-regulated protocols requiring IRB submission.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Informed Consent Form — Clinical Trial Produces a plain-language ICF (≤ 8th-grade reading level) covering all 21 CFR 50.25 required elements, HIPAA authorization, and ethics-compliant framing for research subjects. ## Prerequisites Collect before drafting: 1. **Protocol details** — title, protocol number, phase, sponsor, IND number 2. **Investigational product** — name, mechanism, dosing, route, known risk profile 3. **Study design** — randomization, arms (incl. placebo), visit schedule, duration 4. **Site info** — PI name/title, institution, IRB name and contact 5. **Risk/benefit data** — preclinical and prior clinical risk frequencies/severities 6. **Injury/compensation policy** — sponsor coverage for research-related injury; participation payments ## Output Structure ### 1. Header Block On every page: protocol title, protocol number, version/date, page X of Y. ### 2. Study Information **Purpose** - Plain-language disease/condition description - What the study tests; trial phase; subject count (site and total) - Include: *"This is a research study, not standard medical treatment."* **Procedures** (chronological) - Screening, randomization (arm probabilities incl. placebo), visit-by-visit table: | Visit | Timing | Duration | Procedures | |---|---|---|---| | Screening | Week −2 | ~2 hrs | Labs, exam, eligibility | | Baseline | Day 1 | ~3 hrs | IP administration, vitals, ECG | | Follow-up | Wk 4, 8, 12 | ~1 hr | Labs, safety assessments | | End of Study | Week 16 | ~2 hrs | Final assessments, unblinding | - Flag research-only vs. standard-of-care procedures - Note preparation requirements (fasting, hold meds) **Risks and Discomforts** Organize by category with frequency and severity: | Category | Example | Frequency | Severity | |---|---|---|---| | Investigational product | Nausea, hepatotoxicity | Common/Rare | Mild/Serious | | Study procedures | Venipuncture bruising | Common | Mild | | Placebo exposure | Forgoing active therapy | N/A | Study-specific | | Reproductive | Teratogenicity | Unknown | Potentially serious | | Privacy/psychosocial | Time burden, incidental findings | Low | Mild | - Include unknown-risks disclosure and new-information notification statement - State injury care/compensation available and what is **not** covered **Potential Benefits** - Direct benefit: state honestly if possible, probable, or not expected; cite prior data; note not guaranteed - Societal benefit: knowledge advancement - Payments/free medication: list but clarify these are not medical benefits - Include: *"Not participating will not affect your access to standard medical care."* ### 3. Subject Rights **Confidentiality** - Coded identifiers, encrypted storage, limited access - Authorized accessors: research team, IRB, FDA, sponsor/monitors, DSMB - Mandatory disclosure circumstances (reporting obligations, court order) - Publication: no individual identification; data retention period stated - **HIPAA Authorization** (if applicable): PHI use/disclosure scope; required for participation **Voluntary Participation and Withdrawal** - Voluntary; refusal/withdrawal does not affect care or benefits - Withdraw any time without penalty; contact PI at listed number - Pre-withdrawal data may be retained; investigator/sponsor may remove subject for safety, non-compliance, or study termination - New findings affecting willingness will be communicated **Contacts** | Role | Name | Phone | Hours | |---|---|---|---| | PI (questions, injuries) | [Name, MD] | [###-###-####] | 24/7 emergencies | | IRB (rights concerns) | [IRB Name] | [###-###-####] | M–F 9–5 | | After-hours emergency | [On-call] | [###-###-####] | Evenings/weekends | ### 4. Consent Statement First-person acknowledgment covering: form read/explained, questions answered, voluntary participation, right to withdraw, agreement to participate in [Study Title], Protocol [Number]. **Optional check-box consents** (if applicable): - Future biospecimen research use - Genetic testing - Long-term follow-up contact - HIPAA authorization ### 5. Signature Block (per 21 CFR 50.27) | Signatory | Printed Name | Signature | Date | |---|---|---|---| | Research Subject | | | | | Legally Authorized Representative | | | | | Representative's relationship/authority | | N/A | N/A | | Impartial Witness (if subject cannot read) | | | | | Person Obtaining Consent (name + role) | | | | - Subject receives signed, dated copy - Add re-consent rows if protocol requires re-consent at defined intervals ## Drafting Rules - **Reading level**: ≤ 8th grade; define technical terms on first use - **No exculpatory language**: No waiver of legal rights or liability release (21 CFR 50.25(a)(8)) - **Therapeutic misconception**: Distinguish research from treatment; do not overstate direct benefit - **Placebo disclosure**: Explain probability and risk of forgoing active therapy - **Vulnerable populations**: Add protections per 21 CFR 50 Subparts C, D (pregnant women, children, prisoners, cognitively impaired) - **Formatting**: ≥ 12pt font, section headings, page numbers, version/date footer; typical 8–15 pages ## Checklist Before Finalizing - [ ] All 21 CFR 50.25(a) basic elements present - [ ] All applicable 50.25(b) additional elements included - [ ] No exculpatory language - [ ] HIPAA authorization section included (if applicable) - [ ] Vulnerable-population protections added (if applicable) - [ ] Reading level verified ≤ 8th grade - [ ] IRB approval required before use; retain IRB-stamped version as operative document - [ ] **[VERIFY]**: Confirm ICH E6(R3) GCP requirements align with jurisdiction's adoption status
Related Skills
validating-clinical-data-quality
Structures data quality assessment with completeness, accuracy, and consistency validation. Use when auditing clinical data, assessing data quality, or validating data integrity.
tracking-clinical-deterioration
Implements early warning score monitoring (NEWS, MEWS) with escalation criteria. Use when monitoring clinical deterioration, calculating early warning scores, or triggering rapid response criteria.
performing-quality-assurance-reviews
Structures radiology peer review and quality assurance with discrepancy classification. Use when conducting peer review, classifying discrepancies, or documenting QA findings.
performing-image-guided-procedures
Documents image-guided biopsy, drainage, and injection procedures with technique and specimens. Use when performing IR procedures, documenting image-guided interventions, or recording procedural details.
performing-frozen-section-analysis
Guides intraoperative frozen section evaluation with rapid diagnostic protocols and communication. Use when performing frozen sections, providing intraoperative diagnoses, or communicating preliminary results.
performing-emergency-procedures
Documents procedural indications, consent, technique, and complications for ED procedures. Use when performing emergency procedures, documenting procedural notes, or recording bedside procedures.
performing-autopsy-protocols
Structures autopsy examination with organ system review, cause-of-death determination, and documentation. Use when performing autopsies, documenting autopsy findings, or determining cause of death.
mapping-clinical-terminologies
Maps between clinical terminologies (ICD-10, SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm) with semantic equivalence validation. Use when mapping medical codes, converting between terminologies, or validating code mappings.
managing-predictive-analytics-clinical
Evaluates and deploys clinical predictive models with validation, bias assessment, and monitoring. Use when evaluating prediction models, assessing algorithmic bias, or deploying clinical ML.
managing-informed-consent-research
Structures research consent documentation with required elements and vulnerable population protections. Use when creating research consents, managing consent processes, or documenting informed consent.
managing-informed-consent-compliance
Evaluates informed consent practices against state law requirements and institutional policies. Use when auditing consent processes, reviewing consent form adequacy, or managing consent compliance.
managing-good-clinical-practice
Applies GCP/ICH principles to clinical research operations with compliance monitoring. Use when ensuring GCP compliance, training on ICH guidelines, or auditing research practices.