informed-consent-form-clinical-trial

Drafts an IRB-ready Informed Consent Form (ICF) for FDA-regulated clinical trials compliant with 21 CFR 50.25, 50.27, and ICH-GCP. Use when drafting or revising consent documents for Phase I–IV trials, IND studies, or other FDA-regulated protocols requiring IRB submission.

11 stars

Best use case

informed-consent-form-clinical-trial is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts an IRB-ready Informed Consent Form (ICF) for FDA-regulated clinical trials compliant with 21 CFR 50.25, 50.27, and ICH-GCP. Use when drafting or revising consent documents for Phase I–IV trials, IND studies, or other FDA-regulated protocols requiring IRB submission.

Teams using informed-consent-form-clinical-trial should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/informed-consent-form-clinical-trial/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/informed-consent-form-clinical-trial/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/informed-consent-form-clinical-trial/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How informed-consent-form-clinical-trial Compares

Feature / Agentinformed-consent-form-clinical-trialStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts an IRB-ready Informed Consent Form (ICF) for FDA-regulated clinical trials compliant with 21 CFR 50.25, 50.27, and ICH-GCP. Use when drafting or revising consent documents for Phase I–IV trials, IND studies, or other FDA-regulated protocols requiring IRB submission.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Informed Consent Form — Clinical Trial

Produces a plain-language ICF (≤ 8th-grade reading level) covering all 21 CFR 50.25 required elements, HIPAA authorization, and ethics-compliant framing for research subjects.

## Prerequisites

Collect before drafting:

1. **Protocol details** — title, protocol number, phase, sponsor, IND number
2. **Investigational product** — name, mechanism, dosing, route, known risk profile
3. **Study design** — randomization, arms (incl. placebo), visit schedule, duration
4. **Site info** — PI name/title, institution, IRB name and contact
5. **Risk/benefit data** — preclinical and prior clinical risk frequencies/severities
6. **Injury/compensation policy** — sponsor coverage for research-related injury; participation payments

## Output Structure

### 1. Header Block

On every page: protocol title, protocol number, version/date, page X of Y.

### 2. Study Information

**Purpose**
- Plain-language disease/condition description
- What the study tests; trial phase; subject count (site and total)
- Include: *"This is a research study, not standard medical treatment."*

**Procedures** (chronological)
- Screening, randomization (arm probabilities incl. placebo), visit-by-visit table:

| Visit | Timing | Duration | Procedures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screening | Week −2 | ~2 hrs | Labs, exam, eligibility |
| Baseline | Day 1 | ~3 hrs | IP administration, vitals, ECG |
| Follow-up | Wk 4, 8, 12 | ~1 hr | Labs, safety assessments |
| End of Study | Week 16 | ~2 hrs | Final assessments, unblinding |

- Flag research-only vs. standard-of-care procedures
- Note preparation requirements (fasting, hold meds)

**Risks and Discomforts**

Organize by category with frequency and severity:

| Category | Example | Frequency | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational product | Nausea, hepatotoxicity | Common/Rare | Mild/Serious |
| Study procedures | Venipuncture bruising | Common | Mild |
| Placebo exposure | Forgoing active therapy | N/A | Study-specific |
| Reproductive | Teratogenicity | Unknown | Potentially serious |
| Privacy/psychosocial | Time burden, incidental findings | Low | Mild |

- Include unknown-risks disclosure and new-information notification statement
- State injury care/compensation available and what is **not** covered

**Potential Benefits**
- Direct benefit: state honestly if possible, probable, or not expected; cite prior data; note not guaranteed
- Societal benefit: knowledge advancement
- Payments/free medication: list but clarify these are not medical benefits
- Include: *"Not participating will not affect your access to standard medical care."*

### 3. Subject Rights

**Confidentiality**
- Coded identifiers, encrypted storage, limited access
- Authorized accessors: research team, IRB, FDA, sponsor/monitors, DSMB
- Mandatory disclosure circumstances (reporting obligations, court order)
- Publication: no individual identification; data retention period stated
- **HIPAA Authorization** (if applicable): PHI use/disclosure scope; required for participation

**Voluntary Participation and Withdrawal**
- Voluntary; refusal/withdrawal does not affect care or benefits
- Withdraw any time without penalty; contact PI at listed number
- Pre-withdrawal data may be retained; investigator/sponsor may remove subject for safety, non-compliance, or study termination
- New findings affecting willingness will be communicated

**Contacts**

| Role | Name | Phone | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| PI (questions, injuries) | [Name, MD] | [###-###-####] | 24/7 emergencies |
| IRB (rights concerns) | [IRB Name] | [###-###-####] | M–F 9–5 |
| After-hours emergency | [On-call] | [###-###-####] | Evenings/weekends |

### 4. Consent Statement

First-person acknowledgment covering: form read/explained, questions answered, voluntary participation, right to withdraw, agreement to participate in [Study Title], Protocol [Number].

**Optional check-box consents** (if applicable):
- Future biospecimen research use
- Genetic testing
- Long-term follow-up contact
- HIPAA authorization

### 5. Signature Block (per 21 CFR 50.27)

| Signatory | Printed Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Subject | | | |
| Legally Authorized Representative | | | |
| Representative's relationship/authority | | N/A | N/A |
| Impartial Witness (if subject cannot read) | | | |
| Person Obtaining Consent (name + role) | | | |

- Subject receives signed, dated copy
- Add re-consent rows if protocol requires re-consent at defined intervals

## Drafting Rules

- **Reading level**: ≤ 8th grade; define technical terms on first use
- **No exculpatory language**: No waiver of legal rights or liability release (21 CFR 50.25(a)(8))
- **Therapeutic misconception**: Distinguish research from treatment; do not overstate direct benefit
- **Placebo disclosure**: Explain probability and risk of forgoing active therapy
- **Vulnerable populations**: Add protections per 21 CFR 50 Subparts C, D (pregnant women, children, prisoners, cognitively impaired)
- **Formatting**: ≥ 12pt font, section headings, page numbers, version/date footer; typical 8–15 pages

## Checklist Before Finalizing

- [ ] All 21 CFR 50.25(a) basic elements present
- [ ] All applicable 50.25(b) additional elements included
- [ ] No exculpatory language
- [ ] HIPAA authorization section included (if applicable)
- [ ] Vulnerable-population protections added (if applicable)
- [ ] Reading level verified ≤ 8th grade
- [ ] IRB approval required before use; retain IRB-stamped version as operative document
- [ ] **[VERIFY]**: Confirm ICH E6(R3) GCP requirements align with jurisdiction's adoption status

Related Skills

validating-clinical-data-quality

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures data quality assessment with completeness, accuracy, and consistency validation. Use when auditing clinical data, assessing data quality, or validating data integrity.

tracking-clinical-deterioration

11
from CaseMark/skills

Implements early warning score monitoring (NEWS, MEWS) with escalation criteria. Use when monitoring clinical deterioration, calculating early warning scores, or triggering rapid response criteria.

performing-quality-assurance-reviews

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures radiology peer review and quality assurance with discrepancy classification. Use when conducting peer review, classifying discrepancies, or documenting QA findings.

performing-image-guided-procedures

11
from CaseMark/skills

Documents image-guided biopsy, drainage, and injection procedures with technique and specimens. Use when performing IR procedures, documenting image-guided interventions, or recording procedural details.

performing-frozen-section-analysis

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides intraoperative frozen section evaluation with rapid diagnostic protocols and communication. Use when performing frozen sections, providing intraoperative diagnoses, or communicating preliminary results.

performing-emergency-procedures

11
from CaseMark/skills

Documents procedural indications, consent, technique, and complications for ED procedures. Use when performing emergency procedures, documenting procedural notes, or recording bedside procedures.

performing-autopsy-protocols

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures autopsy examination with organ system review, cause-of-death determination, and documentation. Use when performing autopsies, documenting autopsy findings, or determining cause of death.

mapping-clinical-terminologies

11
from CaseMark/skills

Maps between clinical terminologies (ICD-10, SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm) with semantic equivalence validation. Use when mapping medical codes, converting between terminologies, or validating code mappings.

managing-predictive-analytics-clinical

11
from CaseMark/skills

Evaluates and deploys clinical predictive models with validation, bias assessment, and monitoring. Use when evaluating prediction models, assessing algorithmic bias, or deploying clinical ML.

managing-informed-consent-research

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures research consent documentation with required elements and vulnerable population protections. Use when creating research consents, managing consent processes, or documenting informed consent.

managing-informed-consent-compliance

11
from CaseMark/skills

Evaluates informed consent practices against state law requirements and institutional policies. Use when auditing consent processes, reviewing consent form adequacy, or managing consent compliance.

managing-good-clinical-practice

11
from CaseMark/skills

Applies GCP/ICH principles to clinical research operations with compliance monitoring. Use when ensuring GCP compliance, training on ICH guidelines, or auditing research practices.